Skip to content

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Peripheral Nerve Block

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Peripheral Nerve Block

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03922620
Enrollment
1
Registered
2019-04-22
Start date
2020-01-23
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2023-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Opioid Use, Pain, Acute, Surgery

Brief summary

Liposomal bupivacaine has gained interest in recent literature for its potential to be an effective adjunct to other pain control modalities in a multi-modal approach to post-operative pain control. The goal of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of local administration of liposomal bupivacaine versus the efficacy of a peripheral nerve block in terms of post-operative pain scores after elective ankle and hindfoot surgery. The investigators hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference in the pain scores of these two groups in opioid naïve patients.

Detailed description

Liposomal bupivacaine has gained interest in recent literature for its potential to be an effective adjunct to other pain control modalities in a multi-modal approach to post-operative pain control. Liposomal bupivacaine is an analgesic that is suspended in lipids to allow for gradual release of the analgesic over a 72-hour period (NAMDARI). From prior literature, the utilization of local analgesics infiltrated into surgical sites have been shown to reduce pain in the immediate post-operative period in foot and ankle surgery (GADEK). However, the evaluation of liposomal bupivacaine in foot and ankle surgery is limited. One prospective study found that the addition to liposomal bupivacaine to a multi-modal pain management protocol for forefoot surgery resulted in decreased pain scores during the first four post-operative days as well as fewer refills of opioid pain medication prescriptions, although both findings were not statically significant (ROBBINS). As the general medical community and public policy makers continue to focus on decreasing the amount of opioid pain medications prescribed and available in the community due to the opioid epidemic, liposomal bupivacaine has the potential to be a useful adjunct in the management of post-operative pain without reliance on opioid prescriptions. The goal of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of local administration of liposomal bupivacaine versus the efficacy of a peripheral nerve block in terms of post-operative pain scores after elective ankle and hindfoot surgery. The investigators hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference in the pain scores of these two groups in opioid naïve patients. Furthermore, this study aims to determine if there are differences in the amount of opioid medications utilized for post-operative pain control, patient satisfaction scores, functional outcomes, complications, and unscheduled healthcare contact between the two groups. In order to accomplish these aims, a randomized, controlled investigation will be conducted.

Interventions

DRUGLiposomal bupivacaine

Local infiltration of 20cc of Liposomal Bupivacaine infiltrated to the surgical area

DRUGPeripheral Nerve Block

Peripheral Nerve Block performed by anesthesia team (blocks will be given by same anesthesia provider utilizing same technique every time in order to reduce variations in delivery of peripheral nerve block).

Sponsors

Geisinger Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients 18 years of age or older 2. Patients undergoing elective primary ankle or hindfoot surgery (ankle arthrodesis, subtalar arthrodesis, triple arthrodesis, total ankle arthroplasty, peroneal tendon debridement/transfer, Cavus Reconstruction, Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy, Dwyer Osteotomy)

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are undergoing revision surgical procedure 2. Patients who have taken opioid pain medications in the past 3 months prior to surgical procedure 3. Patients who have allergies to any of the medications or components of medications investigated in the study 4. Patients currently incarcerated 5. Patients who cannot read and speak English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale Pain ScoreBaseline and 6 weeksBest 0-10 worst - Continuous scale to measure current pain level

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morphine Equivalents0-6 weeksmorphine equivalents consumed for post-operative pain control
Investigator-developed, Pain Satisfaction Score0-6 weeksasks patients to rate their level of satisfaction with their pain control on a scale of 0-10, 0 being not satisfied at all and 10 being highly satisfied
Range of Motion0-6 weeksrange of motion measured using goniometer
Number of Participants With Complications6 weekscomplications after surgery including infection and delayed healing
Number of Participants With Unscheduled Healthcare Contact6 weeksunscheduled healthcare contact includes patient calls/messages, emergency room visits, or scheduled clinic visits

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liposomal Bupivacaine Group
No peripheral nerve block will be given. Local infiltration of 20cc of Liposomal Bupivacaine infiltrated to the surgical area. Liposomal bupivacaine: Local infiltration of 20cc of Liposomal Bupivacaine infiltrated to the surgical area
1
Peripheral Nerve Block Group
Peripheral Nerve Block performed by anesthesia team (blocks will be given by same anesthesia provider utilizing same technique every time in order to reduce variations in delivery of peripheral nerve block). No local analgesic agent infiltration Peripheral Nerve Block: Peripheral Nerve Block performed by anesthesia team (blocks will be given by same anesthesia provider utilizing same technique every time in order to reduce variations in delivery of peripheral nerve block).
0
Total1

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyData and outcome measures not tabulated due to discontinued enrollment.10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiposomal Bupivacaine GroupTotalPeripheral Nerve Block Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Analog Scale Pain Score

Best 0-10 worst - Continuous scale to measure current pain level

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: One participant analyzed at baseline as only one total participant was enrolled. No data was displayed at 6 weeks time frame because data was not collected by investigator(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Liposomal Bupivacaine GroupVisual Analog Scale Pain ScoreBaseline6 score on a scale
Secondary

Investigator-developed, Pain Satisfaction Score

asks patients to rate their level of satisfaction with their pain control on a scale of 0-10, 0 being not satisfied at all and 10 being highly satisfied

Time frame: 0-6 weeks

Population: Data was not collected by investigator(s).

Secondary

Morphine Equivalents

morphine equivalents consumed for post-operative pain control

Time frame: 0-6 weeks

Population: Data was not collected by investigator(s).

Secondary

Number of Participants With Complications

complications after surgery including infection and delayed healing

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: One participant analyzed as only one total participant was enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Liposomal Bupivacaine GroupNumber of Participants With Complications0 Participants
Peripheral Nerve Block GroupNumber of Participants With Complications0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Unscheduled Healthcare Contact

unscheduled healthcare contact includes patient calls/messages, emergency room visits, or scheduled clinic visits

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: One participant analyzed as only one total participant was enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Liposomal Bupivacaine GroupNumber of Participants With Unscheduled Healthcare Contact0 Participants
Peripheral Nerve Block GroupNumber of Participants With Unscheduled Healthcare Contact0 Participants
Secondary

Range of Motion

range of motion measured using goniometer

Time frame: 0-6 weeks

Population: Data was not collected by investigator(s).

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026