Skip to content

Endoscopic Tympanoplasty: Single Versus Double Flap Technique

Endoscopic Tympanoplasty: Single Versus Double Flap Technique

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03922295
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-04-19
Start date
2017-08-24
Completion date
2019-02-20
Last updated
2019-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tympanic Membrane Perforation

Brief summary

Aim of this study is to compare results of double and single flap techniques for tympanoplasty in chronic suppurative otitis media patients. Inclusion criteria include total or subtotal tympanic membrane perforations with limited anterior remnant and should be dry for at least 3 months. Patients with persistent discharge, cholesteatoma, ossicular affection or those with recurrent perforations after previous myringoplasty were excluded. Also, patients with uncontrolled diabetes, chronic liver and kidney diseases and immuno-compromised patients are not included in this study. Patients are divided into two groups, endoscopic double flap group and endoscopic single flap group. Healing and hearing outcomes were evaluated 3 months postoperative. Also, post-operative pain scores and complications were assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic tympanoplasty

In the double flap group, graft is placed via elevation of both posterior and anterior flaps. In the single flap group, graft is placed via elevation of posterior flap only

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with chronic suppurative otitis media with total or subtotal tympanic membrane perforation with limited anterior remnant. * dry perforation for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent perforation after previous myringoplasty. * Ossicular disruption or fixation. * immune-compromised patients including uncontrolled diabetics, chronic liver and kidney diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healing or graft take rate3 months after surgeryclosure of tympanic membrane perforation

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026