Skip to content

A Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Nemolizumab in Adolescent Participants With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Group Clinical Trial to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Adolescent Subjects (12-17 Years) With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03921411
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-04-19
Start date
2019-04-09
Completion date
2020-08-19
Last updated
2023-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

Nemolizumab, Atopic dermatitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of nemolizumab in adolescent participants with AD.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNemolizumab

Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of 30 milligram (mg) of Nemolizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) over a 16-week treatment period, with a loading dose of 60 mg on Day 1.

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria * Male or female participants ≥ 12 to \< 17 years of age * Chronic AD that has been documented for at least 2 years * Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16 * Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3 * AD involvement ≥ 10% of Body Surface Area (BSA) * Documented recent history of inadequate response to topical medications * Women of childbearing potential must agree to be strictly abstinent or to use an effective and approved method of contraception throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Body weight \< 30 kilogram (kg) * Cutaneous infection within 1 week or any infection requiring treatment with oral or parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, or antifungals within 1 week * History of hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis) to an immunoglobulin product (plasma-derived or recombinant, example., monoclonal antibody) * Any medical or psychological condition, or any clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities that may have put the subject at significant risk according to the investigator's judgment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% Predicted Value at Week 4At week 4PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF \<80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.
Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 16At week 16Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to 4 Week Post-dose (AUC0-4w)Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)Pre-dose through 12 week post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2)Baseline to week 24Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) is the time required for a given drug concentration in the serum to decrease by 50%.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) in Serum at Week 4At week 4Antidrug antibodies were determined using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay. Number of participants with positive ADA in Serum were reported.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing AntibodiesBaseline up to Week 24The number of participants with neutralizing antibodies response at time of baseline up to week 24 has been presented. Neutralizing antibodies response assay result have been only presented for participants with positive anti-drug antibody assay.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline through week 24An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs is any AE that resulted in death, life threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in offspring of a study participant, is an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical intervention. TEAE was defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI is a noteworthy event for study drug that should be monitored closely and reported immediately. The following AEs will be considered AESIs: Anaphylactic reactions, Acute allergic reactions requiring treatment, Severe injection site reaction, Newly-diagnosed asthma or worsening of asthma, Peripheral edema: limbs, bilateral and Facial edema.
Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 1-2At week 1-2The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.
Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 4At week 4The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.
Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 8At week 8The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.
Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 12At week 12The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination (PE) FindingsBaseline up to Week 24A complete PE included assessments of the head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (including thyroid), skin/integumentary system, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, musculoskeletal system, lymph nodes, and nervous system. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory ValuesBaseline up to Week 24Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 16At week 16The ECG recordings were obtained after 10 minutes of rest in a semi-supine position. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in ECG findings were reported. Clinically significance was decided by investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsBaseline up to Week 24Vital signs included pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (after the participant had been sitting for at least 5 minutes), and body temperature. Clinically significance was decided by investigator..
Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% of Predicted Value at Week 1-2At week 1-2PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF \<80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.
Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 4At week 4Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 1-2At week 1-2Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 4At week 4Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 8At week 8Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 12At week 12Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 16At week 16Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 24At week 24Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (Cl/F) of NemolizumabBaseline to week 24CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time \[AUC (0-inf)\].
Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vd/F) of NemolizumabBaseline to week 24Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda\_z \*AUC(0-inf).
Population Lag Time (Tlag)Baseline to week 24Lag time is defined as the time taken for a drug to appear in the systemic circulation following administration. The population Tlag value was estimated for the overall population and was reported in this endpoint.
First Order Constant of Absorption (ka)Baseline to week 24PK of Nemolizumab was evaluated in participants using Ka using PK samples collected on Weeks 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. Ka was evaluated by population PK (popPK) methods and mean and standard from the model has been tabulated.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of NemolizumabBaseline to week 12Cmax was obtained from serum concentration time curve.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of NemolizumabBaseline to week 12Time to reach maximum observed serum concentration (Tmax) for Nemolizumab was derived from serum concentrations versus time data.
Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 8At week 8Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 12At week 12Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)Pre-dose through 12 week post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule
Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16EASI assesses severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. Each characteristic was assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The total EASI score range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of AD.
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. Each characteristic was assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of AD.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as IGA 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear]) From Baseline to Week 16Baseline to Week 16IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of AD. Ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), where higher score indicated higher severity. IGA success is defined as participants with 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and at least 2 -grade improvement from baseline. Number of Participants who achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success from baseline to week 16 were reported.
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Baseline, Week 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16 and 24BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) is a validated measure commonly used to assess the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. Extent and intensity of six types of basic lesions (erythema/darkening, edema/papule, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification/prurigo and dryness) and symptoms (itching and loss of sleep) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Number of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Baseline through Week 24Number of topical AD medication-free days through Week 16 was calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither topical corticosteroid (TCS)/ topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days.
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) For Participants > 16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16Baseline, Week 16The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participants were rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and overall score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).
Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants 12-16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16Baseline, Week 16The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participants were rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and overall score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).
Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Weeks Post-dose AUC(0-4w)Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-doseArea under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 31 participants were screened, of which 20 were enrolled and 18 participants were treated with study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nemolizumab
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of 30 milligram (mg) of Nemolizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) over a 16-week treatment period, with a loading dose of 60 mg on Day 1.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyEnrolled, but never treated2
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNemolizumab
Age, Continuous14.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other: Hispanic
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (Cl/F) of Nemolizumab

CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time \[AUC (0-inf)\].

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabApparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (Cl/F) of Nemolizumab0.325 liter/day (L/day)Standard Deviation 0.153
Primary

Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) is the time required for a given drug concentration in the serum to decrease by 50%.

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabApparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2)16.666 dayStandard Deviation 4.115
Primary

Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vd/F) of Nemolizumab

Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda\_z \*AUC(0-inf).

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabApparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vd/F) of Nemolizumab7.15 literStandard Deviation 2.24
Primary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 12 week post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabArea Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)411707.857 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 142851.408
Primary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabArea Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)549489.167 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 184483.765
Primary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabArea Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)284397.143 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 97105.285
Primary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to 4 Week Post-dose (AUC0-4w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabArea Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to 4 Week Post-dose (AUC0-4w)144046.235 nanogram*day per milliliter (ng*day/mL)Standard Deviation 50800.805
Primary

First Order Constant of Absorption (ka)

PK of Nemolizumab was evaluated in participants using Ka using PK samples collected on Weeks 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. Ka was evaluated by population PK (popPK) methods and mean and standard from the model has been tabulated.

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabFirst Order Constant of Absorption (ka)0.402 1/dayStandard Deviation 0.145
Primary

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Nemolizumab

Cmax was obtained from serum concentration time curve.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Nemolizumab5975.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2175.2
Primary

Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 12

Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: At week 12

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 123221.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1781.15
Primary

Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 1-2

Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: At week 1-2

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 1-26478.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2393.11
Primary

Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 16

Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: At week 16

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 163010.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1131.81
Primary

Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 24

Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: At week 24

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 24473.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 333.72
Primary

Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 4

Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: At week 4

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 42935.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1029.41
Primary

Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 8

Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: At week 8

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 83292.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2017.83
Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% of Predicted Value at Week 1-2

PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF \<80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.

Time frame: At week 1-2

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% of Predicted Value at Week 1-21 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% Predicted Value at Week 4

PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF \<80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.

Time frame: At week 4

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% Predicted Value at Week 41 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 12

The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

Time frame: At week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 121 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 1-2

The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

Time frame: At week 1-2

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 1-20 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 4

The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

Time frame: At week 4

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 40 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 8

The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is all the time (1) to none of the time (5); Question 2 range: more than once a day (1) to not at all (5); Question 3 range: 4 or more nights a week (1) to not at all (5); Question 4 range: 3 or more times per day (1) to not at all (5); Question 5 range: not controlled at all (1) to completely controlled (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

Time frame: At week 8

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 80 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 16

The ECG recordings were obtained after 10 minutes of rest in a semi-supine position. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in ECG findings were reported. Clinically significance was decided by investigator.

Time frame: At week 16

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 160 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values

Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory ValuesHematology6 Participants
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory ValuesBiochemistry5 Participants
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory ValuesUrinalyses0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination (PE) Findings

A complete PE included assessments of the head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (including thyroid), skin/integumentary system, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, musculoskeletal system, lymph nodes, and nervous system. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination (PE) Findings2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital signs included pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (after the participant had been sitting for at least 5 minutes), and body temperature. Clinically significance was decided by investigator..

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT set who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies

The number of participants with neutralizing antibodies response at time of baseline up to week 24 has been presented. Neutralizing antibodies response assay result have been only presented for participants with positive anti-drug antibody assay.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The safety population included all participants in the ITT who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs is any AE that resulted in death, life threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in offspring of a study participant, is an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical intervention. TEAE was defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI is a noteworthy event for study drug that should be monitored closely and reported immediately. The following AEs will be considered AESIs: Anaphylactic reactions, Acute allergic reactions requiring treatment, Severe injection site reaction, Newly-diagnosed asthma or worsening of asthma, Peripheral edema: limbs, bilateral and Facial edema.

Time frame: Baseline through week 24

Population: The Safety population included all participants in the ITT who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs6 Participants
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TE-AESIs2 Participants
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) in Serum at Week 4

Antidrug antibodies were determined using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay. Number of participants with positive ADA in Serum were reported.

Time frame: At week 4

Population: The Safety population included all participants in ITT population who were administered at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) in Serum at Week 41 Participants
Primary

Population Lag Time (Tlag)

Lag time is defined as the time taken for a drug to appear in the systemic circulation following administration. The population Tlag value was estimated for the overall population and was reported in this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabPopulation Lag Time (Tlag)1.0728 hoursStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Nemolizumab

Time to reach maximum observed serum concentration (Tmax) for Nemolizumab was derived from serum concentrations versus time data.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabTime to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Nemolizumab5.862 daysStandard Deviation 1.669
Primary

Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 12

Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: At week 12

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabTrough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 122886.796 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1441.998
Primary

Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 16

Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: At week 16

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabTrough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 162981.792 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1166.871
Primary

Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 4

Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: At week 4

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabTrough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 43271.859 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1268.612
Primary

Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 8

Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: At week 8

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabTrough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 83056.496 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1367.884
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16

EASI assesses severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. Each characteristic was assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The total EASI score range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of AD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16-15.994 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9413
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16-2.610 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6148
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16-3.122 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8216
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16-3.050 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2367
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24

BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16 and 24

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form.~Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Week 1 to 2-1.9 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 6.33
NemolizumabChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Week 4-7.1 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 15.9
NemolizumabChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Week 8-11.2 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 15.48
NemolizumabChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Week 12-17.2 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 17.94
NemolizumabChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Week 16-19.9 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 17.04
NemolizumabChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit up to Week 24Week 24-14.7 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 17.88
Secondary

Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants 12-16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16

The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participants were rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and overall score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here Number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabChildren's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants 12-16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16Baseline10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.42
NemolizumabChildren's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants 12-16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16Week 166.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.29
Secondary

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) For Participants > 16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16

The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participants were rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and overall score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here Number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) For Participants > 16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16Baseline11.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
NemolizumabDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) For Participants > 16 Years of Age at Baseline and Week 16Week 163.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Secondary

Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule

Time frame: Pre-dose through 12 week post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNon-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)332928.434 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 121739.832
Secondary

Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNon-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)372858.017 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 149908.126
Secondary

Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Weeks Post-dose AUC(0-4w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNon-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Weeks Post-dose AUC(0-4w)122286.736 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 44081.623
Secondary

Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in the Safety population who provided at least 1 post-baseline evaluable drug concentration value. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNon-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)233258.841 ng*day/mLStandard Deviation 80113.408
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as IGA 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear]) From Baseline to Week 16

IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of AD. Ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), where higher score indicated higher severity. IGA success is defined as participants with 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and at least 2 -grade improvement from baseline. Number of Participants who achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success from baseline to week 16 were reported.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NemolizumabNumber of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as IGA 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear]) From Baseline to Week 167 Participants
Secondary

Number of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24

Number of topical AD medication-free days through Week 16 was calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither topical corticosteroid (TCS)/ topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here Number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabNumber of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Baseline to Week 1-23.5 DaysStandard Deviation 2.25
NemolizumabNumber of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Week 1-2 to Week 47.5 DaysStandard Deviation 4.87
NemolizumabNumber of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Week 4 to Week 812.1 DaysStandard Deviation 7.2
NemolizumabNumber of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Week 8 to Week 129.7 DaysStandard Deviation 5.96
NemolizumabNumber of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Week 12 to Week 1610.7 DaysStandard Deviation 5.82
NemolizumabNumber of Topical Atopic Dermatitis Medication-Free Days Through Week 24Week 16 to Week 2423.4 DaysStandard Deviation 11.88
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16

EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. Each characteristic was assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of AD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabPercent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16-66.52 Percent changeStandard Deviation 32.461
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16

Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) is a validated measure commonly used to assess the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. Extent and intensity of six types of basic lesions (erythema/darkening, edema/papule, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification/prurigo and dryness) and symptoms (itching and loss of sleep) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabPercent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16-50.08 Percent changeStandard Deviation 26.925
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16-40.85 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.293
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]), higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16-43.21 Percent of changeStandard Deviation 36.97
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants who signed informed consent form. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemolizumabPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16-53.51 Percent changeStandard Deviation 47.782

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026