Skip to content

Utility of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in the NICU: A Pilot Study

Utility of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in the NICU: A Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03918707
Enrollment
115
Registered
2019-04-17
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2021-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genetic Disease, Genetic Syndrome

Brief summary

This is a pilot study involving a prospective group of 15 evaluable patients who will undergo rapid whole genome sequencing in addition to standard of care testing. Subjects will be drawn from children admitted to the NICU at OSF Health Care Children's Hospital of Illinois who meet inclusion criteria. The aims of this study are to evaluate the turn-around time and cost of performing rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) compared to standard of care in the diagnosis of genetic disorders among critically ill infants in a regional children's hospital and to describe management outcomes of utilizing rWGS in acutely ill patients less than four months of age.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTRapid Whole Genome Sequencing (rWGS)

rWGS will be performed on blood samples from subjects in the prospective group in addition to standard of care laboratory testing and imaging studies. Blood samples will also be obtained from biological parents (if available), to determine if variants are inherited or de novo and for variant segregation.

Sponsors

Rady Children's Institute of Genomic Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Months to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients in the NICU less than 4 months of age with complex medical presentation of unknown etiology, who have 2 or more of the following are eligible: * critically ill\* and/or organ dysfunction * one or more major congenital anomalies * dysmorphic features and/or abnormal growth parameters * neurologic impairment (seizure, hypotonia, encephalopathy) * cardiomyopathy * features suggestive of a metabolic disorder (eg unexplained/persistent hypoglycemia or acidosis) * critically ill - cardiorespiratory insufficiency requiring ventilatory or cardiac support

Exclusion criteria

* previously confirmed specific genetic diagnosis (antenatal or postnatal) * obvious clinical findings for a specific condition that could be tested by targeted gene analysis * preterm less than 24 weeks post-menstrual age * ward of the state * parent/legal guardian refusal to give consent for participation in the study * patient does not meet eligibility criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Turnaround TimeDuration of individual patients hospital stay typically less than 60 daysIf normally distributed, we will use t test for univariate analysis, and linear regression models for multivariate analysis to assess the intervention effects. Otherwise, we will use Wilcoxon two-sample t test or robust linear regression models. For other categorical variables, we will use chi-square to compare the difference between the prospective and historical control groups. Stratified analysis will be performed in order to get insight into the relationships of the data. We will analyze data within intervention, and control group, respectively. Means and standard deviations will be reported for continuous variables, and percentage values, odds ratio, 95% confidence interval will be reported for categorical variables. The two-tailed p values are calculated for all tests, and p\<0.05 will be considered a statistically significant result. SAS 9.4 will be used for data management and data analysis.
Cost of Hospitalization until Genetic DiagnosisDuration of individual patients hospital stay typically less than 60 daysIf normally distributed, we will use t test for univariate analysis, and linear regression models for multivariate analysis to assess the intervention effects. Otherwise, we will use Wilcoxon two-sample t test or robust linear regression models. For other categorical variables, we will use chi-square to compare the difference between the prospective and historical control groups. Stratified analysis will be performed in order to get insight into the relationships of the data. We will analyze data within intervention, and control group, respectively. Means and standard deviations will be reported for continuous variables, and percentage values, odds ratio, 95% confidence interval will be reported for categorical variables. The two-tailed p values are calculated for all tests, and p\<0.05 will be considered a statistically significant result. SAS 9.4 will be used for data management and data analysis.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026