Skip to content

Post Intravitreal Injection Topical NSAID vs. Patching

Pain Control Following Intravitreal Injection Using Topical Nepefanac 0.3% or Pressure Patching: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03918590
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-04-17
Start date
2018-12-03
Completion date
2019-06-03
Last updated
2019-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, Retinal Vein Occlusion

Brief summary

A prospective randomized trial, to evaluate post-injection comfort measures comparing topical NSAID (nepafenac 0.3% suspension) and patching.

Detailed description

This is a single masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study that will enroll approximately 60 subjects with recent active retina related disease requiring intravitreal agents. Subjects will be randomized into one of 3 groups in a 1:1:1 ratio, and assigned to receive nepafenac 0.3% suspension or a sham procedure. Subjects will have a one in three (33%) chance of receiving active treatment (no sham procedure), a one in three (33%) chance of receiving patching procedure (no active treatment) or a one in three (33%) chance of receiving placebo (no active treatment). Study participants will then complete the Visual Analog Scale immediately following injection and then after 1 hour, and, 24 hours. The VAS data along with relevant data related to each subject's injection will also be compiled, including, but not limited to: drug injected, diagnosis, co-morbid conditions, history of previous injections, visual acuity, age, and gender.

Interventions

DRUGnepafenac 0.3% suspension (Ilevro; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX)

NSAID

DRUGTheratears tear drop, (Akron, Ann 111 Arbor, MI)

preservative-free Artificial Tears

OTHERpatching

no drug/ patching

Sponsors

The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Group 1: Placebo (Preservative free artificial tears) Group 2: Nepefanac 0.3% suspension Group 3: Patch for 2 hours

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Already scheduled for anti-VEGF injection based on standard of care for disease process. * Ability to provide written informed consent * Capable of complying with study protocol. * Volunteer written informed consent with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the subject at any time without prejudice to future care

Exclusion criteria

* History of past intraocular injection of steroid medication. * Experiencing baseline eye pain * Monocular; non-study eye with VA\<20/100. * Unwilling or unable to follow or comply with all study related procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Intravitreal Injection Measurement of Pain6 hours and 24 hours after intravitreal injectionChange from Baseline post intravitreal injection pain at 6 and 24 hours as measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The pain numeric rating scale (NRS), on which patients rate their current pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), at the screening, 6 hours and 24 hours.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026