Skip to content

Study of the Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Right Hemicolectomy: HEMI-D-TREND-study

A Multicenter Controlled Study of the Intracorporeal Mechanical Side-to-side Isoperistaltic Anastomosis Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: HEMI-D-TREND-study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03918369
Acronym
HEMI-D-TREND
Enrollment
416
Registered
2019-04-17
Start date
2019-03-07
Completion date
2023-09-01
Last updated
2024-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Cancer

Keywords

Right Colon Cancer,, Right hemicolectomy, Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, Intracorporeal anastomosis

Brief summary

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is the second most frequent cancer in the Western world. Roughly a third of colorectal tumors are located in the right colon, and right hemicolectomy surgery is the treatment of choice in non-disseminated right colon cancer and other benign pathologies. Despite the introduction of laparoscopy and multimodal fast-track perioperative management programs in recent years, postoperative complication rates remain high. The most serious complication is anastomotic leak (AL), which is associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stay, and reduced quality of life due to the presence of ostomies. For a long time, the importance of ileo-colic AL was underestimated. However, the ANACO study, conducted in 52 hospitals in our environment, reported a rate of AL of 8.4% with a range of 0 to 35%. This wide range is due to the differences in the surgical procedures and anastomoses used (the surgical approach may be open or laparoscopic, and the anastomosis may be manual or mechanical, with all its variations). The results of intracorporeal laparoscopic anastomosis in the literature vary widely and, are discordant, although those reported so far estimate a DA less than 2%. But the latest publications report low rates of morbidity and of surgical space infection (SSI). The main problem with this technique is that it requires a learning curve somewhat greater than the others and its results depend on the skill of the surgeon and his casuistry. For all these reasons, it is necessary to carry out comparative studies that favor the use of this technique as gold standard. The multicentre, controlled and randomized controlled studies have the disadvantage that randomization in centers not used with one of the techniques does include a learning curve bias. Besides the fact that in a center there is a belief that one of the techniques is superior to the other, it is not ethical to randomize the techniques. This situation has encouraged us to perform a non-randomized TREND-study design (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs-TREND). Main objective: To assess if laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, with anastomosis, obtains better results than laparoscopic with extracorporeal anastomosis and open surgery in terms of global morbidity, surgical space infection, anastomotic leak, re-interventions and hospital stay, in the first 30 postoperative days. Secondary objectives: To analyze the rate of anastomotic leak (AL) and organ-cavitary infections in each hospital. * Compare the results obtained with those published in the literature. * Try to identify the risk factors associated with AL. * Analyze the comorbidities associated with the type of incision made for the extraction of the surgical piece, in intra and extracorporeal anastomosis

Detailed description

Study Design: TREND-study design (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs-TREND): A multicenter prospective, non-randomized, controlled study of the intracorporeal mechanical side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. TREND-study. Study procedure Intracorporeal anastomosis group The laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal mechanical side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis. In this procedure, intracorporeal division of the mesoileum and transverse colon is performed, as shown in the animation. The ileum and transverse colon are divided with the Endopath® Echelon Flex ™ 60 stapler. The specimen is inserted in a plastic bag. Side-to-side isoperistaltic mechanical anastomosis is performed using the same endostapler. A running suture is performed of the mechanical suture orifice, with another reinforcing suture with Monocryl ™ (poliglecaprone 25) or with STRATAFIX ™ Spiral Knotless barbed suture. The specimen is extracted through a Pfannestiel minilaparotomy (3.5-4 cm) Wound Protector Extracorporeal anastomosis group according to the usual technique in each center. Expected duration of subject participation; what is done and when: Duration of the study two years. Population Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the right colon up to the hepatic angle after complete colonoscopy, biopsy, and chest, abdominal and pelvic CT, and chest radiography, of the participating hospitals. Recruitment Plan Centers intracorporeal group: Parc Taulí University Hospital, Spain. Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Spain. Hospital de Cancer de Barretos. Brazil Centers extracorporeal group: Consorcio Hospitalario de Terrassa (Barcelona), Spain. Hospital de Universitario de Vich (Barcelona), Spain. Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Spain. Hospital Santa Tecla de Tarragona, Spain. Hospital Universitario Sant Joan de Reus (Tarragona), Spain.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.

Intracorporeal anastomosis group The laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal mechanical side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis. In this procedure, intracorporeal division of the mesoileum and transverse colon is performed, as shown in the animation. The ileum and transverse colon are divided with the Endopath® Echelon Flex ™ 60 stapler. The specimen is inserted in a plastic bag. Side-to-side isoperistaltic mechanical anastomosis is performed using the same endostapler. A running suture is performed of the mechanical suture orifice, with another reinforcing suture with Monocryl ™ (poliglecaprone 25) or with STRATAFIX ™ Spiral Knotless barbed suture. The specimen is extracted through a Pfannestiel minilaparotomy (3.5-4 cm) Wound Protector

PROCEDURELaparoscopic right hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis with the technical features of each center

Sponsors

Mireia Pascua-Solé
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Laura Mora-Lopez
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Anna Pallisera-Lloveras
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sheila Serra-Pla
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ricard Sales
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Beatriz Espina
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Luis Romangolo
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Anna Serracant
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cristina Ruiz
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mº José Mañas Gomez
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Angels Montserrat-Marti
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mireia Merichal
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Antonio Sanchez
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Helena Vallverdú
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Corporacion Parc Tauli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A multicenter prospective, non-randomized, controlled study of the intracorporeal mechanical side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. TREND-study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with right colon neoplasia non-metastatic. * Indication of right hemicolectomy and ileo-colic anastomosis. * Over 18 years. * Scheduled surgery intervened by the team of surgeons of the Coloproctology Unit of each participating hospital. * Patients who undergone a perioperative management program corresponding to the usual practice and technique of each hospital.

Exclusion criteria

* Colon neoplasms from other locations. * T4 tumor stage and stage IV of the TNM classification. * ASA IV (American Society Anesthesiologists). * Non-optimal nutritional status (preoperative albumin ≤3.4 g / dl). * Do not sign informed consent. * Pregnant patients. * Liver cirrhosis. * Chronic renal insufficiency in dialysis treatment. * BMI \<18 and\> 35 Kg / m

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of anastomotic leak (AL)30 daysPercentage of anastomic leak (defined in accordance with Peel et al.).
Rate of global morbidity30 daysDindo-Clavien Classification
Rate of Surgical site infection30 daysSSI in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) National Nosocomial Infection Monitoring System
Rate of Re-interventions30 daysPercentage of re-interventions due to surgical complications

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026