Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Conditions
Keywords
Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Disease-Free Survival, Sunitinib, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Prognosis
Brief summary
Observational, retrospective, multicentre study in spanish patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib as a first-line treatment (treatment with previous cytokine therapy is accepted) according to clinical practice who obtained a complete response (CR) to treatment in one of these 2 situations: 1. Complete response (CR) obtained exclusively with first-line sunitinib treatment (sunitinib CR). 2. Response obtained after a period of time on treatment with sunitinib in which local treatment was also performed (surgery of the residual metastasis/metastases, radiofrequency ablation or radiotherapy) to achieve the total macroscopic disappearance of the disease, according to the opinion of the physician responsible for the patient (CR + local treatment).
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients who are 18 year-old or over who have been treated for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sunitinib as first-line treatment (treatment with prior cytokine therapy is accepted) between 2007 and 30 September 2018 and who have obtained as a best treatment response the total remission of the disease in the opinion of the doctor in charge from a clinical, radiological and/or macroscopic point of view. This response must have been reached through two possible strategies: A) Systemic treatment with sunitinib alone. B) Treatment with sunitinib and subsequent local treatment for one or more residual lesions that have not responded to the drug (traditional surgery, radiotherapy, SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy)). 2. The duration of CR must have been confirmed with at least 2 consecutive imaging tests, without having a limit in the duration of this response. Although the patient had progressed subsequently, he/she may be included in this registry. 3. Patients from any risk group 4. Tumours of any histology
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients treated with another drug other than Sunitinib. 2. Patients with no radiology reports proving CR. 3. Patients with no record of the dose and regimen received with Sunitinib. 4. Patients who achieved complete remission after 30 September 2018.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Complete Remission of Lesions | From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Time to complete remission of lesions was calculated as the difference between treatment start date and complete response (CR) confirmation date. As per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1, CR = disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and the absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 millimeter (mm). CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive computed tomography (CT) scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them during the follow-up of participants. Confirmation from the oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. |
| Duration of Complete Remission (DOR) | From first documented CR date until progression/death or change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity or last follow-up date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | DOR was defined as the time from date on which the CR was identified until tumor progression, the change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity, death from any cause or until the date of the last follow-up at the close of study. As per RECIST v1.1: CR = disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm. Tumor progression = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | From CR confirmation date until progression/death or change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity/last follow-up date, up to maximum of approximately 13 years (data collected, observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | PFS was calculated as the time from the date of CR confirmation (2nd CT scan) until the date of progression/death or change of treatment for unacceptable toxicity or censored on the date of the last follow-up. As per RECIST v1.1: CR = disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm. Tumor progression = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Histology Type | From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Time to achieve CR according to type of histology as clear cell, non-clear cell and sarcomatoid were reported in this outcome measure. Time to CR was calculated as the difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. |
| Duration of Response Based on Type of Treatment Received | From first documented CR date until progression/death or change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity or last follow-up date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Duration of response was defined as the time from date on which the CR was identified until the date of the CT scan conforming tumor progression, the change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity, death from any cause or until the date of the last follow-up at the close of study. As per RECIST v1.1: CR = disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm. Tumor progression = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Number of Participants With Dose Interruption | From start of drug up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | — |
| Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis | From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Time to CR: difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. Heng prognostic model identified KPS of \<80 at treatment initiation, period from diagnosis to start of treatment for metastatic disease \<1year, anemia, hypercalcemia, neutrophilia, thrombocytosis as prognostic factors. Participants were classified into 3 prognosis group: favorable(0 factor), intermediate(1-2 factors) and poor(3 or more factors). KPS measured ability of participants with cancer to perform ordinary tasks. KPS scores range: 0 (dead) to 100 (normal, no complaint). High KPS score= participant better able to carry out daily activities. |
| Number of Participants Who Discontinued Sunitinib Treatment Due to Toxicity | From start of drug up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Number of participants who discontinued sunitinib treatment due to toxicity were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity to Sunitinib | From start of drug up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Number of participants with Grade 3 or higher toxicity as per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4 were reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death. |
| Number of Participants Who Received Subsequent Local Treatment | Up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Local treatments were the following: traditional surgery, radiotherapy, or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to achieve the total macroscopic disappearance of the disease along with CR, according to the opinion of the physician responsible for the participant. |
| Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis at Least 2 Consecutive CT Scans | From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Time to CR: difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. Heng prognostic model identified KPS of \<80 at treatment initiation, period from diagnosis to start of treatment for metastatic disease \<1year, anemia, hypercalcemia, neutrophilia, thrombocytosis as prognostic factors. Participants were classified into 3 prognosis group: favorable(0 factor), intermediate(1-2 factors) and poor(3 or more factors). KPS measured ability of participants with cancer to perform ordinary tasks. KPS scores range: 0(dead) to 100(normal, no complaint). High KPS score=participant better able to carry out daily activities. |
| Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Previous Nephrectomy Status | From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months) | Time to achieve CR according to previous nephrectomy status were reported in this outcome measure. Time to CR was calculated as the difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. |
Countries
Spain
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants aged above or equal to 18 years, with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and who according to the usual evaluation criteria in daily clinical practice obtained a complete response with sunitinib as first-line treatment between 2007 and 30 October 2018, either alone or with subsequent local treatment, were observed retrospectively in this study for a period of 10 months approximately.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Sunitinib Participants who received sunitinib as first line therapy (treatment with prior cytokine therapy was accepted) in real world clinical practices, between 2007 and 30 October 2018, either alone or with subsequent local treatment (surgery of the residual metastasis/metastases, radiofrequency ablation or radiotherapy) and achieved a complete response were observed in the study. The participants were administered with sunitinib 50 mg capsule orally once daily on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment (4/2 regimen) or 2 weeks on treatment followed by 1 week off treatment (2/1 regimen), or with 37.5 mg capsule orally once daily of 4/2 regimen. | 62 |
| Total | 62 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Sunitinib | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 58.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | — |
| Blood Hemoglobin Level | 14.0 Gram per deciliter STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 | — |
| Blood Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Level | 262.6 Units per liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 122.7 | — |
| Corrected Blood Calcium Level | 9.4 Milligram per deciliter STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 | — |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0 | 38 Participants | — |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 1 | 22 Participants | — |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 2 | 1 Participants | — |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Data not available | 1 Participants | — |
| Histological Type of Tumor Clear Cell | 49 Participants | — |
| Histological Type of Tumor Data not available | 1 Participants | — |
| Histological Type of Tumor Non-clear Cell | 5 Participants | — |
| Histological Type of Tumor Sarcomatoid | 7 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Bone | 6 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Brain | 2 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Contralateral Kidney | 2 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Endocrine Glands | 6 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Liver | 6 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Lung | 42 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Muscles, Soft tissues, Vessels and Peritoneum | 8 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Nodes | 23 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Metastatic Sites Pancreas | 5 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Heng Prognostic Criteria Favorable | 13 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Heng Prognostic Criteria Intermediate | 40 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Heng Prognostic Criteria Poor | 4 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Motzer Prognostic Criteria Favorable | 11 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Motzer Prognostic Criteria Intermediate | 42 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Motzer Prognostic Criteria Poor | 2 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Tumor Fuhrman Grade Data not available | 8 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Tumor Fuhrman Grade I | 3 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Tumor Fuhrman Grade II | 23 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Tumor Fuhrman Grade II and IV | 1 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Tumor Fuhrman Grade III | 18 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants Classified According to Tumor Fuhrman Grade IV | 9 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Autoimmune Disease | 0 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Bowel Disease | 1 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Cardiovascular Disease | 29 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Chronic Dermatological Disease | 1 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Liver Disorders | 2 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Obesity | 11 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Other Disease | 28 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Comorbidities Renal Failure | 5 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Previous Nephrectomy Status No | 6 Participants | — |
| Number of Participants With Previous Nephrectomy Status Yes | 56 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites 1 | 25 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites 2 | 13 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites 3 | 7 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites 4 | 2 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites 5 | 4 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites Data not available | 8 Participants | — |
| Participants With Number of Metastatic Sites Greater than (>) 5 | 3 Participants | — |
| Platelets Level and Neutrophils Level Neutrophils | 4.3 10^9 cells per liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 | — |
| Platelets Level and Neutrophils Level Platelets | 260.0 10^9 cells per liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 99.6 | — |
| Pre-treatment Necrosis Percentage | 18.2 Percentage of Necrosis STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.4 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Time Interval From Nephrectomy to Initiation of Sunitinib Treatment | 15.3 Months | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 62 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 51 / 62 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 62 |
Outcome results
Duration of Complete Remission (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from date on which the CR was identified until tumor progression, the change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity, death from any cause or until the date of the last follow-up at the close of study. As per RECIST v1.1: CR = disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm. Tumor progression = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From first documented CR date until progression/death or change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity or last follow-up date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. This outcome measure was evaluated in participants who achieved CR at respective CT scans.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Duration of Complete Remission (DOR) | DOR, 1st CT Scan | 64.1 Months |
| Sunitinib | Duration of Complete Remission (DOR) | DOR, 2nd CT Scan | 62.2 Months |
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was calculated as the time from the date of CR confirmation (2nd CT scan) until the date of progression/death or change of treatment for unacceptable toxicity or censored on the date of the last follow-up. As per RECIST v1.1: CR = disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm. Tumor progression = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From CR confirmation date until progression/death or change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity/last follow-up date, up to maximum of approximately 13 years (data collected, observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | NA Months |
Time to Complete Remission of Lesions
Time to complete remission of lesions was calculated as the difference between treatment start date and complete response (CR) confirmation date. As per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1, CR = disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and the absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 millimeter (mm). CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive computed tomography (CT) scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them during the follow-up of participants. Confirmation from the oncologist and radiologist was required at each site.
Time frame: From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. This outcome measure was evaluated in participants who achieved CR at respective CT scans.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Time to Complete Remission of Lesions | CR at 1st CT Scan | 10.9 Months |
| Sunitinib | Time to Complete Remission of Lesions | CR at 2nd CT Scan | 15.7 Months |
Duration of Response Based on Type of Treatment Received
Duration of response was defined as the time from date on which the CR was identified until the date of the CT scan conforming tumor progression, the change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity, death from any cause or until the date of the last follow-up at the close of study. As per RECIST v1.1: CR = disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm. Tumor progression = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first documented CR date until progression/death or change of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity or last follow-up date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. Here, number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Duration of Response Based on Type of Treatment Received | Sunitinib Monotherapy | 69.8 Months |
| Sunitinib | Duration of Response Based on Type of Treatment Received | Sunitinib + subsequent local treatment | 58.4 Months |
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Sunitinib Treatment Due to Toxicity
Number of participants who discontinued sunitinib treatment due to toxicity were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From start of drug up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. Here overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Number of Participants Who Discontinued Sunitinib Treatment Due to Toxicity | 9 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Received Subsequent Local Treatment
Local treatments were the following: traditional surgery, radiotherapy, or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to achieve the total macroscopic disappearance of the disease along with CR, according to the opinion of the physician responsible for the participant.
Time frame: Up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Number of Participants Who Received Subsequent Local Treatment | 14 Participants |
Number of Participants With Dose Interruption
Time frame: From start of drug up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Number of Participants With Dose Interruption | 47 Participants |
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity to Sunitinib
Number of participants with Grade 3 or higher toxicity as per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4 were reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death.
Time frame: From start of drug up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. Here overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity to Sunitinib | 28 Participants |
Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis
Time to CR: difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. Heng prognostic model identified KPS of \<80 at treatment initiation, period from diagnosis to start of treatment for metastatic disease \<1year, anemia, hypercalcemia, neutrophilia, thrombocytosis as prognostic factors. Participants were classified into 3 prognosis group: favorable(0 factor), intermediate(1-2 factors) and poor(3 or more factors). KPS measured ability of participants with cancer to perform ordinary tasks. KPS scores range: 0 (dead) to 100 (normal, no complaint). High KPS score= participant better able to carry out daily activities.
Time frame: From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. Here overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis | Favorable | 9.3 Month |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis | Intermediate | 11.7 Month |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis | Poor | 6.1 Month |
Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis at Least 2 Consecutive CT Scans
Time to CR: difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site. Heng prognostic model identified KPS of \<80 at treatment initiation, period from diagnosis to start of treatment for metastatic disease \<1year, anemia, hypercalcemia, neutrophilia, thrombocytosis as prognostic factors. Participants were classified into 3 prognosis group: favorable(0 factor), intermediate(1-2 factors) and poor(3 or more factors). KPS measured ability of participants with cancer to perform ordinary tasks. KPS scores range: 0(dead) to 100(normal, no complaint). High KPS score=participant better able to carry out daily activities.
Time frame: From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. Here overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis at Least 2 Consecutive CT Scans | Favorable | 14.8 Months |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis at Least 2 Consecutive CT Scans | Intermediate | 15.5 Months |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Heng I Criteria Prognosis at Least 2 Consecutive CT Scans | Poor | 10.7 Months |
Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Histology Type
Time to achieve CR according to type of histology as clear cell, non-clear cell and sarcomatoid were reported in this outcome measure. Time to CR was calculated as the difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site.
Time frame: From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable. Here overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Histology Type | Clear cell | 11.0 Months |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Histology Type | Non-clear cell | 8.3 Months |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Histology Type | Sarcomatoid | 9.9 Months |
Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Previous Nephrectomy Status
Time to achieve CR according to previous nephrectomy status were reported in this outcome measure. Time to CR was calculated as the difference between treatment start date and CR confirmation date. As per RECIST v1.1, CR=disappearance of all known target and all non-target lesions and absence of new lesions, normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10mm. CR was confirmed with 2 consecutive CT scans performed with at least 4 weeks between them. Confirmation from oncologist and radiologist was required at each site.
Time frame: From treatment initiation date to CR confirmation date, up to a maximum of approximately 13 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 10 months)
Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion criteria and who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria and received treatment with sunitinib prior to participation in the registry were considered evaluable.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Previous Nephrectomy Status | Previous Nephrectomy: Yes | 10.9 Months |
| Sunitinib | Time to Achieve CR in Participants Classified According to Previous Nephrectomy Status | Previous Nephrectomy: No | 16.6 Months |