Skip to content

Observational Study of Outcomes After EchoMark and EchoSure-based Free Flap Monitoring

Observational Study of Outcomes After EchoMark and EchoSure-based Free Flap Monitoring

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03915717
Enrollment
14
Registered
2019-04-16
Start date
2019-09-19
Completion date
2022-05-05
Last updated
2024-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Free Flap Transfer, Malignant Neoplasm

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the EchoMark and EchoSure as an ultrasound-based method of monitoring the viability of free flaps and patency of at-risk vessels.

Interventions

DEVICEEchoMark

EchoMark is implanted during surgery to mark the at-risk blood vessels to enable EchoSure ultrasound-based monitoring

DEVICEEchoSure

EchoSure ultrasound scans are performed to monitor the free flap

Sponsors

Sonavex, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years * Patients presenting for microvascular tissue transfer procedures where the surgeon has selected EchoMark and EchoSure as the optimal method of vascular monitoring based on clinical assessment and plan * Patient is able to sign informed consent and able to participate in all testing associated with this clinical investigation * Women of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years old * Patient unable to sign informed consent * Patient participating in another investigational device or pharmacological study * Prisoner or patient from vulnerable populations as defined in 45 CFR 46.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgeon Evaluation of Improved Monitoring Ability Via Questionnaire With Likert ScaleThrough study completionSurgeon evaluation of improved monitoring ability via questionnaire with likert scale
Surgeon Evaluation of SatisfactionThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearSurgeon evaluation of satisfaction via questionnaire with likert scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flap Salvage RateThrough patient stay, up to 5 days post-opPercentage of flaps that require salvage after the baseline procedure
Total Cost of HospitalizationThrough patient stay, up to 5 days post-op
Flap Failure RateThrough patient stay, up to 5 days post-opPercentage of flaps that fail
Nurse Evaluation of Improved Monitoring Via Questionnaire With Likert ScaleThrough study completion, an average of 1 year
Time From OR Departure to Return to ORThrough patient stay, up to 5 days post-opNumber of hours from when the subject's baseline procedure ends until a secondary trip to the OR if required.
Flap Takeback RateThrough patient stay, up to 5 days post-opPercentage of flaps that require return to the OR after the baseline procedure through 5 days post-op.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EchoMark / EchoSure
Patients undergoing free flap surgery and have an EchoMark soft tissue marking device placed and monitored with the EchoSure.
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyEchoMark Not Implanted6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEchoMark / EchoSure
Age, Continuous64 Years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Surgeon Evaluation of Improved Monitoring Ability Via Questionnaire With Likert Scale

Surgeon evaluation of improved monitoring ability via questionnaire with likert scale

Time frame: Through study completion

Population: Surgeon Evaluation Questionnaire was not completed, Data was not collected.

Primary

Surgeon Evaluation of Satisfaction

Surgeon evaluation of satisfaction via questionnaire with likert scale

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Surgeon Satisfaction Survey was not completed. Data not collected.

Secondary

Flap Failure Rate

Percentage of flaps that fail

Time frame: Through patient stay, up to 5 days post-op

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EchoMark / EchoSureFlap Failure Rate0 Flaps that Failed
Secondary

Flap Salvage Rate

Percentage of flaps that require salvage after the baseline procedure

Time frame: Through patient stay, up to 5 days post-op

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EchoMark / EchoSureFlap Salvage Rate0 Number of Flaps that Require Salvage
Secondary

Flap Takeback Rate

Percentage of flaps that require return to the OR after the baseline procedure through 5 days post-op.

Time frame: Through patient stay, up to 5 days post-op

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EchoMark / EchoSureFlap Takeback Rate0 Flaps that Required Return to the OR
Secondary

Nurse Evaluation of Improved Monitoring Via Questionnaire With Likert Scale

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: The Nurse Questionnaire was not completed. Data was not collected.

Secondary

Time From OR Departure to Return to OR

Number of hours from when the subject's baseline procedure ends until a secondary trip to the OR if required.

Time frame: Through patient stay, up to 5 days post-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
EchoMark / EchoSureTime From OR Departure to Return to ORNA Hours
Secondary

Total Cost of Hospitalization

Time frame: Through patient stay, up to 5 days post-op

Population: Data was not collected on hospitalization costs.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026