Skip to content

Addressing Disparities in Lupus Care Through an Integrated Care Management Program

Addressing Disparities in Lupus Care Through an Integrated Care Management Program (Rheum-iCMP)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03915652
Acronym
Rheum-iCMP
Enrollment
35
Registered
2019-04-16
Start date
2019-06-21
Completion date
2025-07-20
Last updated
2025-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

minority health, prevention, vaccine, behavior, women's health, autoimmune, intervention, survey, QI/QA, outcomes (health services/delivery)

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to identify lupus patients receiving care at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) who are at high risk for potentially avoidable acute care utilization, inconsistent ambulatory care use, and adverse outcomes. The investigators will invite high-risk lupus patients to participate in an intensive care management program with a nurse manager, and will determine whether this program improves receipt of high quality sustained outpatient care and reduces avoidable emergency department visits and hospitalizations. The investigators will also study the social determinants that contribute to acute care use and avoidable outcomes among lupus patients using semi-structured interviews and a photovoice method.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to determine whether an intensive care management program for high-risk lupus patients (Rheum-iCMP, modeled after the highly successful BWH iCMP for primary care patients) reduces acute care utilization (emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations), improves rheumatology clinic appointment attendance, and ultimately improves quality of lupus care in this group. Selected iCMP nurses will receive a 4-hour training using unique educational materials already developed by our team that specifically address lupus-related racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, as well as clinical information about lupus. The investigators plan to identify high-risk lupus patients in the Partners' risk contract (Medicaid, Medicare and certain commercial insurances) with BWH primary care physicians (PCPs) from three sources. First, the investigators will use the BWH Lupus Registry, which is updated regularly and includes lupus patients actively receiving care at BWH. Second, the investigators will identify lupus patients via Partners electronic medical record (EMR) using our validated lupus algorithm and look specifically at those receiving primary care within the BWH system. The investigators will link both BWH Lupus Registry patients and patients meeting our algorithm to claims data through the Population Health Repository. The investigators will then identify patients with increased healthcare utilization, including ED visits and/or hospitalizations during the preceding 3 years, and who are at risk for avoidable outcomes (rheumatology appointment no-shows/same-day cancellations within the same period). The investigators will also apply the Partners' Center for Population Health high-risk algorithm to both cohorts to identify additional high-risk patients. The investigators will then reach out to the identified patients' PCPs or their rheumatologists for approval to send a study invitation to patients or asking physicians to introduce the study to their patients with a fact sheet. Third, the investigators will ask rheumatologists to refer lupus patients who might benefit from Rheum-iCMP, since a similar referral system has been successful within BWH-wide iCMP. The investigators plan to newly enroll 40 lupus patients aged ≥18 years old, both male and female, English-speaking, and who receive their primary care at BWH prospectively using a stepped wedge design starting first with 20 patients enrolled in Rheum-iCMP, and then with 20 additional patients enrolled 4 months later. For the second 20 patients, for the first 4 months, patients will receive educational material about lupus on a monthly basis. The investigators will invite these 40 patients to also participate in a semi-structured interview that includes asking participants ahead of time to take 10-15 photographs (with a disposable camera the investigators will provide) of their neighborhoods and homes, in order to begin a conversation about the social determinants that contribute to their care-seeking behaviors. Participants will then sit with a moderator for a \ 60-90 minute semi-structured, in-depth photo-elicitation interview. Participants will be asked to 1) select the photographs for discussion, 2) contextualize each image and tell a story, 3) describe what is really happening and how it relates to their life and 4) propose suggestions for what can be done to improve any barriers described. The elicitation interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and entered into Dedoose for analysis. Participation in the photographs/interview is not a requirement of being a part of Rheum-iCMP. In addition to these 40 newly enrolled patients, the investigators expect that 100 additional adult lupus patients within the Partners system are already enrolled in BWH iCMP. Among these patients, the investigators plan to examine EMR and claims data pre and post iCMP enrollment as an observational study looking at differences in utilization. However, the investigators do not plan to ask for survey completion for this population since this iCMP program is considered standard of care and these patients are already a part of it. Because the investigators do not feel that this will involve more than minimal risk and because it would not be feasible, the investigators do not plan to consent these individuals to allow us to examine their medical records. The investigators will compare lupus-related quality metrics, rheumatology appointment attendance, and acute care use 12 months after enrollment in rheum-iCMP as compared to 12 months before enrollment in rheum-iCMP. The investigators will collect surveys at 12 months after enrollment in rheum-iCMP. For individuals who unenrolled before the end of the 12-month study period, we will stop the chart review at the date of unenrollment. The investigators will also examine EMR and claims data when available prior to the rheum-iCMP and then for the subsequent 12-24 months during and following rheum-iCMP. For the lupus patients who are already enrolled in BWH iCMP, the investigators will separately compare measures extractable from EMRs and claims pre-iCMP, during iCMP but pre-lupus-specific iCMP nurse training, and during Rheum-iCMP (post- nurse training) for N=100. These data are observational/non-experimental and distinct from the pilot trial intervention and thus cannot be combined and will be analyzed separately. During the intervention period, our project coordinator will set up a sustainable EPIC system for tracking appointment no-shows and SLE quality metrics (e.g. lab monitoring, contraceptive use). The investigators will collect the following surveys: medication adherence and medication beliefs using the MASRI survey and the Beliefs about Medications scale, lupus disease activity using SLAQ, mental health using the MHI-5, social determinants of health using the Partners Healthcare Social Determinants of Health (SDH) Survey, global health assessment using the PROMIS global health scale short form, and racial discrimination using the Everyday Discrimination Scale. The investigators will also collect baseline demographics information via a demographics survey. The investigators will determine acute care utilization (e.g. ED visits, hospitalizations) using partners risk contract claims data. The investigators will also use surveys at 12 months after rheum-iCMP enrollment to assess patient, iCMP nurse, and MD satisfaction. Surveys will be collected at outpatient appointments or via mail. For longer term quality metrics 12-24 months past the intervention period, the investigators will work with the Center for Population Health's team to set up a tracking system that has Partners-wide claims data linked with EMRs. For the 100 patients already enrolled in the iCMP intervention, the investigators assess changes in acute care use (ED visits and hospitalizations) and appointment no shows however this is an observational separate study and will not be compared to data from the newly enrolled patients. The investigators will also collect these data for the 40 newly enrolled patients, which will be analyzed separately as the intervention is different. This is a pilot study. One of our primary measures is to reduce ambulatory rheumatology care no-show rates for the highest risk patients. The investigators estimate that the no-show rate is about 70% and the aim of this study is to reduce this rate to 20%. The investigators would need a total of 40 patients (20 in each arm) to have 80% power to detect this difference, which is why the target enrollment for new patients in Rheum-iCMP is 40.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRheum iCMP

Selected iCMP nurses will receive a 4-hour training using unique educational materials already developed by our team that specifically address lupus-related racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, as well as clinical information about lupus. These iCMP nurses will then reach out to high-risk lupus patients to ensure that patients attend scheduled rheumatology appointments, fill prescriptions for lupus-specific medications, and obtain recommended lupus screening labs and preventive care.

Sponsors

Partners HealthCare
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The investigators plan to newly enroll 40 lupus patients prospectively using a stepped wedge design starting first with 20 patients enrolled in Rheum-iCMP, and then with 20 additional patients enrolled 4 months later. For the second 20 patients, for the first 4 months, patients will receive educational material.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet at least 4 American College of Rheumatology criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatologist diagnosis of SLE * Over the preceding 3 years, at least 1 hospitalization or ED visit related to lupus OR at least 1 rheumatology appointment no-show or same-day cancellation * Receive their primary care at BWH

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English or Spanish speaker

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lupus-related Appointment NonadherenceMean change from 12 months prior to intervention and the 12 months during the interventionMean change in the number of lupus-related ambulatory care visit no-shows and same-day cancellations
Composite Measure of Acute Care UtilizationMean change from 12 months prior to intervention and the 12 months during the interventionMean change in the number of ED visits plus number of hospitalizations
Quality of Lupus Care: SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for AdultsPercent of quality metrics remaining at 12 monthsPercent of quality metrics from the SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for Adults remaining from baseline 12 months after the start of the intervention. The percent of needs remaining at 12 months was determined and the mean (SD) percent of remaining needs was calculated by arm. Percentages can range from 0-100, with 100 meaning that more quality metrics were not completed (worse outcome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5)Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the interventionMean change in depressive or anxious symptoms from baseline to 12 months using the MHI-5 survey. Score range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher scores indicate better mental health).
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale Short FormMean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the interventionMean change in global health from baseline to 12 months using the PROMIS global health scale short form. Score range is 9-45. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher scores indicate improved global health and well-being).
Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI)Mean change from baseline to 12 months after the start of the intervention.Mean change in MASRI score (for lupus medications) from baseline to 12 months. Score range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater adherence (on a scale from 0 to 100, 100 indicating a person's rating of perfect adherence).
Everyday Discrimination ScaleMean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the interventionMean change in daily discrimination encountered from baseline to 12 months using the Everyday Discrimination Scale. Score range is 0-40. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher scores indicate a greater amount of discrimination encountered).
Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) SurveyPercent of social determinants of health-related needs remaining 12 months after the start of the interventionPercent of social determinants of health (SDoH)-related needs at 12 months from baseline using the SDoH Survey. The survey range is 0-8 and the percent of remaining needs is 0-100 with 100 meaning that all of the needs remain (worse outcome).
Beliefs About Medications SurveyMean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the interventionMean change in Beliefs About Medications score (for lupus medications) from baseline to 12 months after the start of the intervention. Score range is 5-25. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher scores indicate more negative feelings about lupus medications).
Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ)Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the interventionMean change in patient-reported lupus disease activity from baseline to 12 months using the SLAQ score. Score range is 0-46. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher scores indicate more lupus disease activity).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The goal enrollment in this trial was 40 individuals, and of this total, the starting N was 35. We experienced difficulties recruiting our target number of 40 individuals and exceeded the time and funding allocated to this study and thus ended enrollment after 35.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rheum iCMP Wave 1
20 patients enrolled immediately in Rheum iCMP Rheum iCMP: Selected iCMP nurses will receive a 4-hour training using unique educational materials already developed by our team that specifically address lupus-related racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, as well as clinical information about lupus. These iCMP nurses will then reach out to high-risk lupus patients to ensure that patients attend scheduled rheumatology appointments, fill prescriptions for lupus-specific medications, and obtain recommended lupus screening labs and preventive care.
18
Rheum iCMP Wave 2
20 patients enrolled in Rheum iCMP after 4 months; will receive monthly lupus educational materials mailed to their home during the first 4 months Rheum iCMP: Selected iCMP nurses will receive a 4-hour training using unique educational materials already developed by our team that specifically address lupus-related racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, as well as clinical information about lupus. These iCMP nurses will then reach out to high-risk lupus patients to ensure that patients attend scheduled rheumatology appointments, fill prescriptions for lupus-specific medications, and obtain recommended lupus screening labs and preventive care.
17
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRheum iCMP Wave 2TotalRheum iCMP Wave 1
Age, Continuous47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5
Baseline Period Acute Care Use1.67 Acute Care Visits
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
1.59 Acute Care Visits
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
1.53 Acute Care Visits
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66
Baseline Period Appointment No Shows8 Appointment No Shows
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
7 Appointment No Shows
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
6 Appointment No Shows
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Beliefs about Medications Survey2.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
2.46 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85
2.53 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
Depressive Symptoms Scale (MHI-5)62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
55 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants9 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants26 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Everyday Discrimination Scale0.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.96
8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.55
Lupus Disease Activity (SLAQ)16.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
15.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.23
10 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07
Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI)97.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
95 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
PROMIS Patient Reported Global Health - Physical Health43.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
43.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09
43.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
Quality of Lupus Care: SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for Adults5.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67
5.39 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23
5.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.89
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants35 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) Number of Needs1.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
1.43 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
1.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.15

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Measure of Acute Care Utilization

Mean change in the number of ED visits plus number of hospitalizations

Time frame: Mean change from 12 months prior to intervention and the 12 months during the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Composite Measure of Acute Care Utilization1.29 Acute Care Use VisitsStandard Deviation 2.54
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Composite Measure of Acute Care Utilization1.17 Acute Care Use VisitsStandard Deviation 1.9
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 were combined and emergency department visits and hospitalizations during the intervention was compared with the 12 months prior.p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-1.08, 0.39]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Lupus-related Appointment Nonadherence

Mean change in the number of lupus-related ambulatory care visit no-shows and same-day cancellations

Time frame: Mean change from 12 months prior to intervention and the 12 months during the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Lupus-related Appointment Nonadherence6.2 Appointment No ShowsStandard Deviation 7.4
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Lupus-related Appointment Nonadherence5.2 Appointment No ShowsStandard Deviation 5.6
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 were combined and appointment nonadherence during the intervention was compared with the 12 months prior.p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-2.88, 1.02]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Quality of Lupus Care: SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for Adults

Percent of quality metrics from the SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for Adults remaining from baseline 12 months after the start of the intervention. The percent of needs remaining at 12 months was determined and the mean (SD) percent of remaining needs was calculated by arm. Percentages can range from 0-100, with 100 meaning that more quality metrics were not completed (worse outcome).

Time frame: Percent of quality metrics remaining at 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Quality of Lupus Care: SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for Adults64 Percent of scoreStandard Deviation 32
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Quality of Lupus Care: SLE Quality Metric Scoring System for Adults53 Percent of scoreStandard Deviation 41
Comparison: Wave 1 and Wave 2 were combined and the quality metric at the end of the 12-month intervention was compared to the metric from the start of the intervention.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.45, 0.73]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Beliefs About Medications Survey

Mean change in Beliefs About Medications score (for lupus medications) from baseline to 12 months after the start of the intervention. Score range is 5-25. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher scores indicate more negative feelings about lupus medications).

Time frame: Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the intervention

Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Beliefs About Medications Survey2.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Beliefs About Medications Survey1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 combined, compared post to pre.p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-0.43, 1.92]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Everyday Discrimination Scale

Mean change in daily discrimination encountered from baseline to 12 months using the Everyday Discrimination Scale. Score range is 0-40. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher scores indicate a greater amount of discrimination encountered).

Time frame: Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the intervention

Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Everyday Discrimination Scale1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Everyday Discrimination Scale1.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 combined; pre/post analysisp-value: 0.3795% CI: [-3.23, 7.52]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI)

Mean change in MASRI score (for lupus medications) from baseline to 12 months. Score range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater adherence (on a scale from 0 to 100, 100 indicating a person's rating of perfect adherence).

Time frame: Mean change from baseline to 12 months after the start of the intervention.

Population: Subset of the population who returned completed baseline and follow-up surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI)65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 49.5
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI)98.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
p-value: 0.5195% CI: [-19.8, 34.8]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5)

Mean change in depressive or anxious symptoms from baseline to 12 months using the MHI-5 survey. Score range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher scores indicate better mental health).

Time frame: Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the intervention

Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up surveys

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5)48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5)58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 are combined; pre/post survey analysisp-value: 0.595% CI: [-6.22, 10.22]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale Short Form

Mean change in global health from baseline to 12 months using the PROMIS global health scale short form. Score range is 9-45. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher scores indicate improved global health and well-being).

Time frame: Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the intervention

Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale Short Form39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale Short Form39.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 combined; pre/post analysisp-value: 0.0195% CI: [1.06, 6.47]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Survey

Percent of social determinants of health (SDoH)-related needs at 12 months from baseline using the SDoH Survey. The survey range is 0-8 and the percent of remaining needs is 0-100 with 100 meaning that all of the needs remain (worse outcome).

Time frame: Percent of social determinants of health-related needs remaining 12 months after the start of the intervention

Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Survey2.33 Percent of baseline scoreStandard Deviation 1.15
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Survey1 Percent of baseline scoreStandard Deviation 1.41
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 combined, pre/post testp-value: 0.7795% CI: [-1.27, 0.98]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ)

Mean change in patient-reported lupus disease activity from baseline to 12 months using the SLAQ score. Score range is 0-46. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher scores indicate more lupus disease activity).

Time frame: Mean change from baseline compared to 12 months after the start of the intervention

Population: Individuals who completed baseline and follow-up surveys

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheum iCMP Wave 1Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ)11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Rheum iCMP Wave 2Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ)14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
Comparison: Waves 1 and 2 combined, compared pre/post interventionp-value: 0.7295% CI: [-4.92, 6.52]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026