Skip to content

GLUtEus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap for Pilonidal Sinus

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobilized Gluteus Maximus Muscle Fascia Flap Versus Primary Closure in the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03914729
Acronym
GLUE
Enrollment
84
Registered
2019-04-16
Start date
2017-04-20
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal Sinus

Keywords

pilonidal sinus, plasty, gluteus muscle fascia, ano-coccygeal plasty

Brief summary

Surgical treatment is still gold standard for pilonidal sinus disease. Several surgical techniques have been proposed to treat this disease in the last two decades. A new method - midline excision of pilonidal sinus and wound closure using gluteus maximus fascia plasty flap (GMFF) - was proposed recently as a new method of treatment that results in low reccurence rate and good cosmetic results. The aim of this study is to compare a new method (GMFF) with a traditional method (midline excision and primary closure) in terms of recurrence rate, complications and patient satisfaction with results.

Detailed description

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a rather rare benign condition (about 26 cases per 100,000 population) that affects primarily young adults. Because of purulent nature it is treated with surgery only. Traditional surgical techniques encompass midline excision of the purulent cyst and either leaving the wound lay open for secondary closure or midline primary closure. The latter method has a major drawback of high recurrence rate and very long healing and patient disability periods. Therefore alternative techniques to close the wound after pilonidal sinus excision were proposed. In some a muscular-cutaneous flaps are created and the wound is closed in a Z- or Y- or other shape manner. The recurrence rate of these techniques is significantly lower than with a traditional midline closure, but healing time and final cosmetic results are far from ideal in patient view. Recently a new method of wound closure was developed independently by a few groups that includes bilateral mobilisation of gluteus maximus muscles fascia and midline closure of the wound. Preliminary results demonstrated that this method leads to lower recurrence rate and better cosmetic results because the natal cleft is saved.

Interventions

A symmetrical elliptical incision of skin and subcutaneous fat around primary and secondary orifices is performed. The cyst is excised en bloc down to the sacral fascia and removed. The lateral edges of the wound are approximated and sutured in the midline: subcutaneous fat - with a running suture, skin - with a separate running suture.

PROCEDUREGluteus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap

A symmetrical elliptical incision of skin and subcutaneous fat around primary and secondary orifices is performed. The cyst is excised en bloc down to the sacral fascia and removed. The lateral edges of the gluteus maximus muscles fascia bilaterally are mobilised in the direction from the fixation point to the sacrum and for 3-4 cm in lateral direction. The fascia flaps edges are approximated and fixed in the midline with a running suture. The subcutaneous fat is closed with a running suture, skin is closed with a separate running suture.

Sponsors

Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective, multi-centre, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Written informed consent 2. Chronic primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus at the remission stage. 3. Presence or absence of secondary orifices. 4. Planned surgical treatment with excision of pilonidal sinus. 5. Location of secondary orifices less than 2 cm from the natal cleft. 6. The distance between bilateral symmetrical secondary orifices less than 2 cm. 7. American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1 to 3 Non-inclusion Criteria: 1. Acute pilonidal sinus abscess. 2. The secondary openings (orifice) position more than 2 cm from the midline. 3. ASA 4-5. 4. Predictable impossibility of following the protocol. 5. Pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

1 The patients lost for the further observation. 2. The patient's refusal to continue participate in the investigation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence ratestarting from 6 months after surgery and up to 5 years after surgeryThe rate of disease recurrence (clinical picture of pilonidal sinus and/or appearance of new openings in the intergluteal cleft and/or chronic unhealing wound and/or residual cavity in the wound area as confirmed by the soft tissue ultrasound)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bloodloss1 dayThe amount of blood lost during surgery
Postoperative pain intensity - early postoperative periodOn 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th postoperative dayPain intensity will be evaluated twice a day (in the morning and in the evening) with a patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing intolerable pain. A total score will be recorded.
Postoperative pain intensity - late postoperative periodOn 10th, 14th, 21st, 30 day after surgeryPain intensity will be evaluated once a day with a patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing intolerable pain. A total score will be recorded.
Surgical site infection rate3 month after surgeryThe rate of infectious inflammation of the wound as confirmed by the observing doctor
Inhospital stay30 daysThe duration of treatment after surgery untill discharge from the hospital (in days)
Wound hemorrhage rateWithin 30 days from surgeryThe rate of hemorrhage from wound edges
Operative time1 dayThe length of surgery in minutes
Wound healing rate6 months after surgeryThe proportion of patients having their wound completely healed
Wound healing speed5 years after surgeryThe time period between surgery and complete healing of the wound
Secondary surgery rate5 yearsThe rate of surgical procedures after initial surgery performed for recurrent disease and/or wound complications
Patient satisfaction with cosmetic results6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years after surgeryPatient-reported with a scale 0-10, where 0 corresponds to completely unsatisfactory and 10 corresponds to completely satisfactory. A total score is registered.
Overall quality of life1-7 days before surgery, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years after surgeryAssessed with patient-reported questionnaire SF-36. A total score in each of 8 sections will be calculated and transformed into a 0-100 scale with a score of zero equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 equivalent to no disability
Wound seroma rate90 days after surgeryThe rate of seroma detection in the wound area as confirmed by soft tissues ultrasound

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactDarya Shlyk, MD
shlyk@kkmx.ru+ 7-920-520-77-06
Backup ContactArcangelo Picciariello, MD
picciariello@kkmx.ru+393492185104

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026