Skip to content

Adequate Sock to Avoid Hiking Injuries

Importance of Sock Type in the Development of Foot Lesions on Low-difficulty, Short Hikes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03914274
Enrollment
109
Registered
2019-04-16
Start date
2015-10-10
Completion date
2016-05-28
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Lesion

Keywords

Sport Injury; Technical socks; Temperature; Hiking

Brief summary

Foot lesions can be developed during hiking because of external factors. This makes it important to study the effect of hiking equipment on lesion development. This study analyzes the extrinsic factors involved in the appearance of injuries at the feet during the realization of a route of low difficulty and short travel. 33 participants wore cotton not technicians socks in his two feet, were used like control socks and 76 participants wore technical socks Tierra and Set one on each foot.

Detailed description

Socks it used as an indispensable element to protect the foot of injuries during sports practice. The different compositions of socks can influence the appearance of injuries. The technical socks are designed for high-performance sports use (Lurbel brand, models Tierra and Set), and non-technical socks (cotton) for everyday use. The socks had different composition: Tierra (50% regenerative, 25% cool-teak, 17% polyamide ions, 8% lycra); Set (75% cotton, 17% polyamide, 8% lycra) and cotton (98% cotton, 2% elastane). The technical socks had reinforced weave in the toe, metatarsal and heel areas.

Interventions

DEVICETechnical sock

Socks were of two types: technical socks, designed for high performance sports use (Lurbel brand, models Tierra and Set), and non-technical socks for everyday use. The socks had different composition: Tierra (50% regeneractiv, 25% cool-teak, 17% polyamide ions, 8% lycra); Set (75% cotton, 17% polyamide, 8% lycra) and cotton (98% cotton, 2% elastane).

Sponsors

University of Extremadura
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The admission criteria were: be of legal age, have no current health problems that would hinder or prevent participation in the hike, and carry a backpack weighing less than 3 kg. Participants were asked to use specific hiking footwear (light, flexible, soft-soled, with good grip and breathable material) (low top hiking shoes), based on earlier studies 38-40. They were also asked to do the entire hike following the instructions of an experienced guide and to not remove their footwear or socks before examination by a podiatrist.

Exclusion criteria

* Not meet any inclusion criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
lesions in foot developed during the hikeThe development of the injuries in a single day of sport activity was observed: kilometer 0 of the route, kilometer 14.5 of the route and kilometer 29.6 of the route.All dermal lesions that developed during the walk (both keratopathies with keratinization disorder and dermatopathies without keratinization disorder) Blister, Injury, (Erosion & chafing), Reddened skin, Urticaria, Crevice, Heloma, all the muscle injuries that developed during the walk (Pain, Inflammation, Muscle discomfort or Sprain) and all the lesions in the skin were analyzed. the nails that developed during the walk, both traumatic and non-traumatic (onycopathies) Onychocryptosis, Subungual hematoma.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TemperatureThe temperature was measured in three occasions in a single day: kilometer 0 of the route, kilometer 14.5 of the route and kilometer 29.6 of the routeWere mearusedTemperatures in different parts of foot with an infrared thermometer (FTN Medisana, precision 0.18º C). Three measurements were done and their media was calculated.
PerimeterThe perimeter was measured in three occasions in a single day: kilometer 0 of the route, kilometer 14.5 of the route and kilometer 29.6 of the routePerimeter in different parts of foot with a flexible, non-elastic tape measure (Lawton 18-0160, precision 1 mm).Three measurements were done and their media was calculated. Three measurements were done and their media was calculated.
WeightThe weight was measured in three occasions in a single day: kilometer 0 of the route, kilometer 14.5 of the route and kilometer 29.6 of the routeWeight was measured using scales (Tanita UM-076, precision 0.1kg).Three measurements were done and their media was calculated.
Height at the start of the route for calculate BMIThe height onli was measured at the start of the walk in a single day: kilometer 0 of the routeHeight was measured using the weight rod of differents scales (SECA 704, precision 1 mm). Three measurements were done and their media was calculated.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026