Skip to content

Intralesional Steroid Injection Versus Voice Therapy in Management of Vocal Nodules

Intralesional Steroid Injection Versus Accent Method of Voice Therapy in Management of Vocal Nodules: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03914092
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-04-16
Start date
2019-06-29
Completion date
2023-08-28
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vocal Nodules in Adults

Brief summary

Vocal nodules represent 16 % of benign vocal fold lesions.They are caused by chronic voice abuse or misuse and often occur in children and adult females. The resultant dysphonia leads to personal, social and occupational problems. The first line of treatment is voice rest and voice therapy. The Accent method is a holistic technique for behavior readjustment voice therapy which targets various voice parameters as loudness, pitch and timbre. However, voice rest and voice therapy are sometimes difficult to be carried out in patients with voice-related occupations. So, complete resolution may not be possible in all patients. When voice therapy is inefficient, resection is performed by laryngeal microsurgery under general anesthesia. However, the role of surgery is much restricted.

Detailed description

An intralesional steroid injection to vocal nodules has come to the forefront as another treatment choice. Steroids decrease the synthesis and maturation of collagen, suppress fibroblast function, and inhibit the antibacterial phagocytic action of some defense cells and vasoactive substances release.These actions are considered to be functional for treating vocal nodules. Many studies, investigated steroid injection in benign lesions including nodules, reported that 93-100% of the nodules either disappeared or improved. The reported nodules recurrence rate after 2 years was 26.7- 31%. However, to our knowledge, no previous study has compared vocal nodule steroid injection with a group receiving voice therapy to accurately assess the clinical role of vocal fold steroid injection.

Interventions

0.1- 0.3 mm percutaneous intralesional injection

BEHAVIORALSmith Accent method of voice therapy

regular sessions of smith accent voice therapy (about 24 sessions, twice session / week) for 3 months

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- 1- Female patients diagnosed with bilateral vocal fold soft edematous nodules with preserved or minimally impacted stroboscopic waves , don't exceed base 2.5 mm and apex .5mm. 2- age: 18-55 years. 3- Normal articulation, resonance and language ability. 4- Normal hearing.

Exclusion criteria

* 1- Previous voice therapy or micro-phono-surgery. 2- Use of drugs (which may cause changes in laryngeal function, mucosa, or muscle activity). 3- History of allergies, lung disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or other concomitant vocal pathology (e.g., vocal polyp and vocal cyst). 4- Current psychiatric, neurological conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective measurements of glottal efficiencyBefore interventionMeasurements of aerodynamic parameter : Maximum phonation time (seconds)
Subjective measurements of severity of dysphoniaBefore interventionMeasurements of change of Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Straining by auditory perceptual assessment using the GRBAS scale. Grades ranging from 0 (normal) up to 3 (severe)
Subjective measurements of patient's assessment of voice severityBefore interventionMeasurements of scores of Arabic Voice Handicap Index
Objective measurements of vocal nodules sizebefore interventionMeasurements of base and rise of nodules using videostroboscopic examination
Objective measurements of vocal pitchBefore interventionMeasurements of acoustic analysis: fundamental frequency (Hz)
Objective measurements of vocal waveform frequency aperiodicityBefore interventionMeasurements of acoustic analysis: jitter (%)
Objective measurements of vocal waveform amplitude aperiodicityBefore interventionMeasurements of acoustic analysis: shimmer (dB)
Objective measurements of vocal waveform periodicity to aperiodicity ratioBefore interventionMeasurements of acoustic analysis : harmonic to noise ratio(dB)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Subjective measurements of severity dysphonia1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change of Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Straining by auditory perceptual assessment using the GRBAS scale. Grades ranging from 0 (normal) up to 3 (severe)
Change in subjective measurements of patient's assessment of voice severity1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change in scores of Arabic Voice Handicap Index
Change in objective measurements of vocal nodules size1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change in base and rise of nodules using videostroboscopic examination
Change in objective measurements of vocal pitch1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change in acoustic analysis including fundamental frequency (Hz)
Change in objective measurements of vocal waveform frequency aperiodicity1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change in acoustic analysis : jitter (%)
Change in objective measurements of vocal waveform amplitude aperiodicity1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change in acoustic analysis : shimmer (dB)
Change in objective measurements of vocal waveform periodicity to aperiodicity ratio1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionChange in measurements of acoustic analysis : harmonic to noise ratio (dB)
Change in objective measurements of glottal efficiency1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after interventionMeasurements of change in aerodynamic parameter: Maximum phonation time (seconds)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026