Skip to content

Methotrexate Use Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Biomarker Feedback

Methotrexate Use Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Biomarker Feedback: A Feasibility Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03913728
Acronym
MIRA
Enrollment
57
Registered
2019-04-12
Start date
2019-05-24
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2023-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The study is a prospective single-centre randomised controlled trial to examine the feasibility of a fully powered randomised controlled trial to examine if HPLC-SRM-MS guided intervention is superior to standard clinical care in improving clinical, behavioural and health-economy outcomes in RA patients prescribed MTX. The trial will consist of 4 stages: * Screening (\ -2 weeks) * Recruitment, consent, randomisation, data collection, examination and blood sampling - baseline visit 1 (time point 0) * Intervention - telephone appointment (visit 2, intervention arm) * Outcome - visit 3 * Process evaluation - visit 4 Prior to any trial specific procedures, the participant must have signed the informed consent form (ICF). The trial will offer a small financial compensation for successfully recruited patients toward the costs of parking/refreshments/travel costs/inconvenience related to attending visits

Detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects up to 1% of the adult population. It is a condition that is treatable by medications. Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line therapy for RA however, up to 60% of patients prescribed MTX still have active RA. This puts these patients at higher risk of joint damage compared to those whose RA is under control. One important explanation for the poor control in those who receive treatment is that some patients, for many reasons, do not take their medications as recommended (non-adherence). Non-adherence is associated with increased costs to the NHS and reduced response to MTX. The study will assess whether it is achievable to conduct a much larger study to explore whether a review of how well patients are coping with MTX can improve RA control. Understanding the reasons for poor RA control has the potential to improve the health and well-being of individual patients, avoid unnecessary tests and hospital appointments and save money in healthcare. The trial will recruit 50 patients with RA who have been prescribed MTX for more than 2 years. 25 patients will be asked to donate blood samples and complete questionnaires, but their treatment will continue as standard. The blood tests will include patients MTX levels. The results of the test provide a direct measure of medication adherence. For the other 25 patients, the results of the blood tests will be fed back to them with tailored targeting of the main reason(s) for the deviation from the prescribed MTX. At the end of the study, the investigators will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a biochemical screening of adherence guided intervention in patients with RA treated with MTX.

Interventions

OTHERDrug level blood tests

All information included previously.

OTHERTelephone Interview

All information included previously.

Sponsors

University of Manchester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Other clinical trial to study a novel intervention or randomised clinical trial to compare interventions in clinical practice

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Prescribed oral MTX for ≥ two years 2. Clinical diagnosis of RA 3. Have a telephone 4. Male or female aged 18 years or above

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with significant psychiatric illness as determined by the clinician 2. Patients unable to attend second appointment 3. Patients unable to provide informed consent 4. Patients with recent changes in the prescribed anti-rheumatic medications within 2 weeks of visit 1 5. Unable to speak English and complete questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trial cost1 year
Recruitment time1 yearLength of time study needs to run for to recruit all participants
Number of patients invited to take part in the study and number of patients recruited1 year
Withdrawal rate1 year
Power for full randomized controlled trial3 monthsChange in proportion of people who adhere over 3 months
Patient opinion of HPLC-SRM-MS guided intervention using semi-structured interviewing1 year
Patient opinion of process of research, including outcome measures using semi-structured patient interviewing1 year
Number of patients correctly having intervention according to allocation1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DAS-28 at baseline and 3 months1 yearThe disease activity score-28 (DAS-28), range 2-10, higher values represent worse disease activity.
Quantity of patient encounters1 yearNumber of patient encounters with healthcare professionals per patient.
Biochemical adherence1 yearMTX quantified with HPLC-SRM-MS from serum.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026