Skip to content

Comparison of Standard of Care Guidelines for Mycoplasma Genitalium Infections Among Men With Non-gonococcal Urethritis

Comparison of Current Standard of Care Versus the Australian Guidelines for Management of Mycoplasma Genitalium Infections Among Men Being Treated for Non-gonococcal Urethritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03910907
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-04-10
Start date
2019-11-19
Completion date
2020-03-20
Last updated
2023-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mycoplasma Genitalium Infection

Keywords

mycoplasma genitalium, urethritis, NGU, treatment

Brief summary

The purpose of this protocol is to determine the difference in clearance of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) when using the Australian management protocol versus the current Centers of Disease Control (CDC) treatment guidelines for US standard of care (SOC), to determine the proportion of men from the Deep South, with NGU attributable to MG, and to determine the proportion of MG cases that harbor the macrolide-resistance associated with mutation.

Detailed description

Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) has been associated with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in many populations and the prevalence of MG strains with macrolide-resistance associated gene mutations is increasing . While no MG diagnostic assays have FDA clearance in the United States (US), treatment for NGU is primarily focused on managing potential infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) using single dose 1 gm Azithromycin (a macrolide class of drug). Without testing for MG that might alter NGU treatment strategies, the current paradigm may be contributing to selective pressure resulting in increased macrolide resistance in MG. In Australia, awareness of the prevalence of MG and macrolide resistance-associated mutations has been facilitated by an approved diagnostic test manufactured by SpeeDx. Ltd. As a result of the epidemiologic information generated by this diagnostic tool \[MG ResistancePlus (MRP) Assay\], the Australian Sexual Health Alliance, who publish the Australian Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Management Guidelines for Use in Primary Care, have revised the management of men with NGU and MG infection. The new management guidelines include initial treatment of NGU with doxycycline, and concomitant testing for MG and macrolide resistance, with subsequent treatment for MG infected patients according to resistance results. We propose using the MRP assay in a population of men with NGU to determine the clinical impact of the Australian treatment strategy compared to the current standard of care for NGU on clearance of MG infection.

Interventions

Treatment according to results of laboratory detection of resistance markers

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presenting with symptoms of urethritis (dysuria and/or urethral discharge)

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants with Molecular Clearance90 daysDNA negative for mycoplasma

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Participants with Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma90 daysDNA positive for macrolide-resistant mycoplasma

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026