Skip to content

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Pain, Fatigue, Quality of Life, Cognitive Function and Mood in Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03909009
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-04-09
Start date
2019-04-11
Completion date
2020-04-10
Last updated
2020-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Fibromyalgia, neuronavigated-rTMS, pain, stiffness, fatigue

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 10 Hz neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on pain, stiffness, fatigue, depression/anxiety, quality of life and cognitive functions in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

Detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study in two-arm parallel-group design. Twenty participants will be randomized into 2 groups. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with 1:1 allocation between the active rTMS group (Group 1) and the sham-control group (Group 2). Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS)-A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). Group 2 will receive sham stimulation-A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).All patients will be evaluated with pain severity (VAS-10mm),stiffness severity (VAS-10mm), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Depression Anxiety Scale (HADS), Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-revised version (ACE-R).Patients will be questioned for the safety of treatment. Available drug therapies will be continued in both groups. Patients and clinical raters will be blinded to treatment. All patients will be reviewed by the investigator in terms of rTMS treatment safety and motor threshold determination before each treatment session and observed for possible side effects after treatment. All side effects will be recorded. Magnetic stimulation will be applied using Neurosoft-Neuro MS/D with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. rTMS therapy will be applied under the guide of neuronavigation with the following parameters: target-left DLPFC, with the %90 of the RMT, 10 Hz stimulation for 5 seconds intervals (on) with 25 seconds inter-train intervals (off), 15 minutes, 1500 pulses.

Interventions

DEVICErTMS + Neuronavigation

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator

Sponsors

Izmir Katip Celebi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (age between 18-65 years) * Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to 2016 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria * The mean pain intensity is VAS ≥ 4/10 * Stable treatment for at least last 3 months * Patients accepting participation by signing an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* To have a clinical condition to be contraindicated for TMS (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, lactation, epilepsy, head trauma, history of cranial operation...) * The presence of malignancy * Systemic rheumatic diseases * Major orthopedic / neurological problems that limit daily life activities * Alcohol or drug addiction * Major depression / personality disorder history * Have received TMS treatment before * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale-Painin the second weekThe severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale-Painin the sixth weekThe severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnairein the sixth weekFunctional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scalein the sixth weekHospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffnessin the second weekThe severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revisedin the sixth weekAddenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnairein the second weekFunctional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
Fatigue Severity Scalein the sixth weekSeverity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) outpatient clinics of a university hospital.

Pre-assignment details

Twenty-eight patients were evaluated for participation in the study. Eight patients were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active rTMS
Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
10
Sham rTMS
Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised62.50 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.8
76.90 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17
69.70 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.76
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous46.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.06
43.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.37
45.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Fatigue Severity Scale5.28 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.23
6.08 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11
5.68 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire65.86 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.27
66.44 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
66.15 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.69
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale19.30 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.14
22.90 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.61
21.10 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.04
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Visual Analog Scale-Pain7.20 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
7.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35
7.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.52
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness7.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58
7.60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17
7.50 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Analog Scale-Pain

The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: in the second week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSVisual Analog Scale-Pain5.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Sham rTMSVisual Analog Scale-Pain6.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Secondary

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

Time frame: in the sixth week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire51.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.17
Sham rTMSFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire56.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.57
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale-Pain

The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: in the sixth week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSVisual Analog Scale-Pain5.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Sham rTMSVisual Analog Scale-Pain6.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Other Pre-specified

Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised

Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.

Time frame: in the sixth week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSAddenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised66.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.67
Sham rTMSAddenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised81.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.79
Other Pre-specified

Fatigue Severity Scale

Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7)

Time frame: in the sixth week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSFatigue Severity Scale4.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Sham rTMSFatigue Severity Scale5.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Other Pre-specified

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

Time frame: in the second week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire48.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.64
Sham rTMSFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire54.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.47
Other Pre-specified

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.

Time frame: in the sixth week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale18.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.82
Sham rTMSHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale17.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.68
Other Pre-specified

Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness

The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: in the second week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active rTMSVisual Analog Scale-Stiffness5.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Sham rTMSVisual Analog Scale-Stiffness6.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026