Skip to content

Intraosseous Catheter Confirmation Study

Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Sensitivity and Specificity of Methods Used to Confirm Correct Placement of an Intraosseous (IO) Catheter

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03908879
Enrollment
34
Registered
2019-04-09
Start date
2019-07-23
Completion date
2022-05-01
Last updated
2023-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Intraosseous catheter, Intraosseous access, Resuscitation, Diagnostic accuracy

Brief summary

This is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study investigating the sensitivity and specificity of methods used to confirm correct placement of an intraosseous (IO) catheter. Intraosseous catheters allow medical providers to rapidly administer fluids and medications to critically ill patients when intravenous (IV) access is not present or difficult to achieve. It is standard of care to confirm the correct placement of an IO catheter prior to using it to administer medications or fluids. Three IO placement confirmatory tests will be performed on all research subjects using a standardized protocol. There will be two index tests (the method utilized by most of the medical community evaluating the stability of the catheter, ability to aspirate blood or bone marrow and ability to administer fluids without visible or palpable extravasation as well as the method of demonstrating color flow Doppler only within the intraosseous space during bedside ultrasound exam) and one reference test (ability to visualized a pulsatile waveform when the IO catheter is attached to a pressure transducer). Primary outcome measures of the study will be the determination of correct or incorrect IO catheter placement from the confirmation methods. This data will be used to investigate the primary endpoints of sensitivity and specificity of the confirmation tests as well as inter-operator variability interpreting the raw data from the confirmation methods. Secondary outcomes include complications from the IO catheter. The goal of this study is to see if a more sensitive and specific method of IO catheter confirmation can reliably be performed by different physicians and reduce the amount of complications associated with the catheters. Additional subgroup analyses will be performed in regards to the research subjects BMI and the anatomic site selected for IO catheter use (proximal tibia or humeral head).

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard intraosseous (IO) catheter confirmation procedure

The physician will evaluate the ability or inability of the intraosseous (IO) catheter to stand upright unassisted, the ability or inability to aspirate blood or bone marrow from the IO catheter, and whether or not there is visible or palpable extravasation of infusate from the IO catheter insertion site or surrounding subcutaneous tissue during IO catheter use.

PROCEDUREColor flow Doppler intraosseous (IO) catheter confirmation procedure

The high frequency probe of a portable ultrasound with color flow Doppler is placed adjacent to the intraosseous (IO) catheter, visualizing the IO space in long or short axis. Color flow Doppler signal will be turned on during IO use and the physician will determine if the Doppler signal is in the intraosseous space or the extraosseous space. Saved data of the ultrasound image will be reviewed independently by at least two blinded reviewers. If the conclusions from the blinded reviewers are discordant then a third blinded reviewer will evaluate the saved data.

PROCEDUREPressure transduction intraosseous (IO) catheter confirmation procedure

The intraosseous (IO) catheter will be attached to a pressure transducer to demonstrate a waveform on the telemetry monitor. Physicians will evaluate for the presence of a pulsatile waveform with objective measurements of a systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and mean pressure. Saved data of the waveform image will be reviewed independently by at least two blinded reviewers. If the conclusions from the blinded reviewers are discordant then a third blinded reviewer will evaluate the saved data.

Sponsors

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

There is only one arm because all participants will be undergoing the same protocol. To evaluate inter-operator variability for methods 2 and 3, co-investigators will be reviewing saved images recorded by the physicians who placed the intraosseous (IO) catheter. Saved images include the color flow Doppler image for method 2 and the pressure waveform for method 3. Two co-investigators will review saved images from method 2, blinded and independently. Two other co-investigators will review saved images from method 3, blinded and independently. If the results of the two co-investigators for method 2 or method 3 is discordant then a third blinded reviewer will review the saved image for the method with discordant results.

Intervention model description

All study participants will undergo all confirmation tests

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients greater than 18 years of age * Full code * Require placement of an intraosseous catheter for emergent resuscitation due to lack of reliable intravenous access * Capable of undergoing all three intraosseous placement confirmatory methods

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years old * Pregnant patients * Prisoner/incarcerated * Patients unable to undergo all three intraosseous placement confirmatory methods

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Categorical determination of correct IO catheter placement by physicians placing the catheterWithin 24 hours of intraosseous (IO) catheter insertionCategorical determination (yes/no) regarding correct IO catheter placement in the intraosseous space of all three confirmatory methods from the physicians placing the IO catheter
Categorical determination of correct IO catheter placement by blinded reviewersWithin 1 week of ultrasound images and pressure transduction images being created by the physician placing the IO catheterCategorical determination (yes/no) regarding correct IO catheter placement in the intraosseous space for method 2 and method 3 by the blinded reviewers

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IO catheter pressureWithin 24 hours of intraosseous (IO) catheter insertionPressures measured from transducing the IO catheter: systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean pressure
Systemic blood pressureWithin 24 hours of intraosseous (IO) catheter insertionPressures measured from a noninvasive blood pressure cuff or an arterial line: systolic pressure diastolic pressure mean pressure
Number of attempts to place IO catheterWithin 24 hours of intraosseous (IO) catheter insertionNumber of attempts made to place an IO catheter
Complications related to IO catheterWithin 28 days of IO catheter insertionComplications associated with the IO catheter after insertion

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026