Skip to content

Treatment of Coronary De-novo Stenosis by a Sirolimus Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter

Treatment of Coronary De-novo Stenosis by a Sirolimus Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03908450
Acronym
SCBDENOVO
Enrollment
70
Registered
2019-04-09
Start date
2019-09-25
Completion date
2023-07-31
Last updated
2024-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

To examine the treatment of coronary de-novo stenosis with a sirolimus coated balloon versus a paclitaxel coated balloon

Detailed description

To examine the treatment of coronary de-novo stenosis with a sirolimus coated balloon versus a paclitaxel coated balloon. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, 70 patients. Experimental intervention: Predilatation of coronary de-novo stenosis followed by a sirolimus coated SeQuent®SCB balloon (sirolimus 4.0 μg/mm²). Control intervention: Predilatation of coronary de-novo stenosis followed by a SeQuent®Please or SeQuent®Please Neo balloon (paclitaxel 3.0 μg/mm²). Follow-up per patient: 30 days telephone call; 6 months angiographic + 12 months. clinical follow up Key inclusion criteria: \> 18 years of age, Clinical evidence of stable or unstable angina or a positive functional study, Patients with significant coronary de-novo stenosis (≥ 70% diameter stenosis or intermediate ≥ 50% to \<70% diameter stenosis with positive functional test or symptom of ischemia), Successful lesion preparation (no flow-limiting dissection or a residual stenosis \> 30%). Key exclusion criteria: Acute myocardial infarction within the past 72 hours (STEMI or NSTEMI), Intolerance and / or allergy to Sirolimus, Intolerance or allergy to Paclitaxel and/or the delivery matrix (main ingredient: iopromide), Patients with an ejection fraction of \< 30 %, Reference vessel diameter (RVD) \< 2.5 mm, Contraindication for whichever necessary accompanying medication. Primary efficacy endpoint: late lumen loss in-segment at 6 months. Key secondary endpoints: Procedural Success: \< 30% final diameter stenosis, no flow-limiting dissection (type C or higher), TIMI III flow, and the absence of in-hospital MACE. MACE: cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization in-hospital at 6 and at 12 months Individual clinical endpoints at 6 and at 12 months: cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, (stenosis ≥ 50% at follow-up angiography)

Interventions

DEVICEPTCA of coronary de novo lesion PCB

PTCA of coronary de novo lesion with drug coated balloon

DEVICEPTCA of coronary de novo lesion SCB

PTCA of coronary de novo lesion with drug coated balloon

Sponsors

InnoRa GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

angiographies blinded to treatment groups

Intervention model description

1:1 randomization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical evidence of stable or unstable angina or a positive functional study * Patients with significant coronary de-novo stenosis (≥ 70% diameter stenosis or intermediate ≥ 50% to \<70% diameter stenosis with positive functional test or symptom of ischemia) * Successful lesion preparation (no flow-limiting dissection or a residual stenosis \> 30%)

Exclusion criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction within the past 72 hours (STEMI or NSTEMI) * Intolerance and / or allergy to Sirolimus * Intolerance or allergy to Paclitaxel and/or the delivery matrix (main ingredient: iopromide) * Patients with an ejection fraction of \< 30 % * Reference vessel diameter (RVD) \< 2.5 mm * Contraindication for whichever necessary accompanying medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
late lumen loss in-segment6 monthsangiographic minimal lumen diameter in-segment at 6 months minus minimal lumen diameter at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural Successin hospital\< 30% final diameter stenosis, no flow-limiting dissection (type C or higher), TIMI III flow, and the absence of in-hospital MACE
MACE MACEat 6 and at 12 monthscardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and TLR target lesion revascularization in-hospital at 6 and at 12 months

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026