Skip to content

RDD Versus VDD in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma

RDD Versus VDD in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03908138
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-04-09
Start date
2019-03-30
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Efficacy, Hematologic Neoplasms, Multiple Myeloma, Safety

Keywords

multiple myeloma, lenalidomide

Brief summary

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a common malignant hematology disease. The development of proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) significantly improved the survival of MM patients. IMiDs have multiple effects in MM therapy. Except for direct cytotoxicity, IMiDs also play a variety of immune regulatory roles. Lenalidomide, a kind of IMiDs, was usually used in the therapy of relapsed/refractory MM. The efficacy and safety of RDD (lenalidomide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, dexamethasone) in newly diagnosed patients with MM still needs to be further validated.

Detailed description

The therapy regimens of MM were very limited before 2000, mainly including VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone), methylpheniram, corticosteroids and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The development of proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in the 2000's significantly improved the survival of MM patients. Combined chemotherapy containing new drugs has become the first-line therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, IMiDs also play a variety of immune regulatory roles. The effects on immune system include reducing TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-12, increasing production of IL-2 and IFN-γ, increasing T cell initiation, enhancing the absorption of tumor antigen by dendritic cells (DCs), enhancing the efficiency of antigen presentation, inhibiting regulatory T cells (Treg), and enhancing the activity of natural killer cells (NK) and NKT cells. Lenalidomide, a kind of IMiDs, also have the effects on osteoclasts, which are important in bone disease in MM patients. In 2006, the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) was approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. The RD regimen was approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients in 2015. Four lenalidomide-containing triple drug regimens were approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM from 2015 to 2016. However, the application of lenalidomide-containing triple drug regimens in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma needs to be further validated. Therefore, we designed the randomized controlled clinical study and aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between RDD (lenalidomide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, dexamethasone) and VDD (bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, dexamethasone) in newly diagnosed patients with MM.

Interventions

DRUGRDD

Lenalidomide: 25mg, po, d1-21, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: 30-40mg/m2,ivgtt, d1 Dexamethasone: 20-40mg, po, d1,d8,d15,d22

DRUGVDD

Bortezomib:1.3mg/m2,ih,d1,d4,d8,d11 Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: 30-40mg/m2,ivgtt, d1 Dexamethasone: 20 mg, ivgtt, d1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11,12

Sponsors

Shandong Provincial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

no mask.

Intervention model description

The patients will be randomized either receiving RDD or receiving VDD therapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic (active) MM; * Ages ≥18 years old, ≤65 years old; * ECOG score: 0-2; * Liver function: transaminase≤2.5×upper limit of normal value,bilirubin≤1.5×upper limit of normal value; * Renal function: serum creatinine is 44-176 mmol/L; * LVEF≥50%; * New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart function classification is I-II grade; * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe complications or severe infection; * Severe heart disease history, including ventricular tachycardia (VT), atrial fibrillation (AF), heart block, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary heart disease patients needed therapy; * Severe allergic constitution, or those who are allergic to or intolerant of drug composition in chemotherapy regimens; with other malignant tumors in the past 5 years; * Patients participate in other clinical studies; * Patients are not suitable for the study; * Other contraindications for ASCT therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
complete response (CR)At 8 monthsmeeting the standard IMWG response criteria (CR and VGCR) of NCCN guidelines (Version2. 2019)
partial remission (PR)At 8 monthsmeeting the standard IMWG response criteria (PR) of NCCN guidelines (Version2. 2019)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progressive free survivalAt 3 months, 5 months, 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months and 36 monthsthe length of time during and after the treatment of MM that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse
overall survival (OS)At 3 months, 5 months, 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months and 36 monthsthe percentage of MM patient who are alive after 3 years.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side effectsAt 3 months, 5 months and 8 monthsIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXin Wang, PhD, MD
xinw@sdu.edu.cn+86-531-68778331
Backup ContactXin Liu, PhD, MD
13518611662@163.com+86-15168889791

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026