Skip to content

Care Pathway for Sub-acute Hip Rehabilitation

Integrated Care Pathway for Hip Fractures in a Subacute Rehabilitation Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03906864
Enrollment
162
Registered
2019-04-08
Start date
2004-09-08
Completion date
2012-12-26
Last updated
2019-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures

Keywords

Critical pathway, length of stay, recovery of function, subacute care

Brief summary

The effectiveness of integrated care pathways for hip fractures in sub-acute rehabilitation settings is not known. The study objective was to assess if a hip fracture integrated care pathway at a sub-acute rehabilitation facility would result in better functional outcomes, shorter length of stay and fewer institutionalisations. A randomised controlled trial on an integrated care pathway was conducted for hip fracture patients in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting. The study supports the use of integrated care pathways in sub-acute rehabilitation settings to reduce length of stay whilst achieving the same functional gains.

Detailed description

All patients admitted to St Luke's Hospital, a 185-bed hospital in Singapore providing multidisciplinary stepdown care, from 8 September 2004 to 14 June 2006 for the purpose of rehabilitation after a new hip fracture were included. Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were present: (i) Pre-morbid non-ambulatory status, (ii) nursing home residents, (iii) palliative care patients, and (iv) patients previously enlisted for the trial. Administrative staff allocated patients to either ICP or usual care according to the last digit of their National Registration Identity Card (NRIC) numbers, odd numbers to the intervention group and even numbers to the control group. Patients were then admitted to 1 of 2 intervention wards or 1 of 3 control wards. Patients were enrolled by the principal investigators only after moving into their respective wards because of work flow limitations. Those who refused consent or were excluded remained in their assigned wards and received usual care. Both intervention and control groups were under the care of multidisciplinary teams but the intervention group had structured assessments and checklists in addition to usual care while the control group had usual care alone.

Interventions

The intervention group had the following as part of the integrated care pathway: 1. Medical assessment on admission for risk factors for falls. 2. A weekly assessment of complications including pain, deep venous thrombosis, anaemia, wounds and pressure ulcers, etc. The Confusion Assessment Method and the Geriatric Depression Scale were utilized. 3. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy guidelines with recommended milestones (set for the full, partial and non-weight bearing groups) 4. Physiotherapy Clinical Outcome Variables Scale (PTCOVS)16 was used by the physiotherapists in the intervention group to assess the baseline mobility, to define outcome goals and to direct treatment plans. 5. A postoperative hip precaution handout (containing information on avoiding hip prosthesis dislocation in patients with total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty) was given to patients and their caregivers.

Sponsors

National University of Singapore
CollaboratorOTHER
St Luke's Hospital, Singapore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Single Blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients admitted to St Luke's Hospital for the purpose of rehabilitation after a new hip fracture.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were present: (i) Pre-morbid non-ambulatory status, (ii) nursing home residents, (iii) palliative care patients, and (iv) patients previously enlisted for the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)1 day At dischargeMRFS is a recognised measure of hip fracture patients' functional outcome, calculated with the following formula, using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores (which scores the degree of independence of a subject from any assistance up to a maximum score of 100)
Proportions of patients achieving pre-morbid ambulatory status1 day At dischargePre-morbid ambulatory status is a predictor for post-operative mobility
Length of stay in hospital1 day At dischargeRefers to the average number of days that patients spend in hospital
Percentage of patients admitted to nursing homeUp to 1 year after dischargeA form of institutional care

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulated mortality1 yearProbability or risk of individuals dying from the disease during a specified period
Quality of life scale-Short form 12 quality of life6 months and 1 yearScale for short form 12 quality of life 0-100 Scale for Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Scale for Mental Component Summary (MCS), a multipurpose, generic measure of health status 0-100 Interpretation of the score : The higher score, the better
Readmissions to an acute hospital for any reasonup to 1-year post-dischargeAn episode when a patient who had been discharged from a hospital is admitted again within a specified time interval

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026