Skip to content

Clinical Trial Comparing C-Brace to Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO)/Stance Control Orthosis (SCO)

Multinational Randomized Controlled Cross-over Trial Comparing C -Brace to Conventional Knee Ankle Foot Orthoses With Respect to Balance, Fall Risk and Activities of Daily Living

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03906656
Enrollment
149
Registered
2019-04-08
Start date
2019-03-11
Completion date
2022-08-23
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pareses, Lower Extremity

Brief summary

Prospective, international, multi-center, open-labeled, randomized, controlled cross-over trial to evaluate effectiveness and benefits in patients with lower limb impairment in activities of daily living comparing the C-Brace microprocessor-controlled stance and swing orthosis to standard of care use of knee ankle foot orthosis/stance control orthoses

Detailed description

After obtaining informed consent, patients will be screened. For subjects fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria, a first baseline assessment will be conducted. Within one to two days, a second set of baseline data will be collected for performance measures. Subjects will then be randomly assigned to be fitted with C-Brace or to continue wearing the current KAFO/SCO. After fitting, an accommodation period follows that will last up to 14 days prior to the initial home use. The first follow-up data collection will occur after three months of the initial home use period. Afterwards, the patients will cross over to KAFO/SCO or C-Brace, respectively. The participants who were fitted with C-Brace will cross over to KAFO/SCO and vice versa. Another accommodation phase will be offered for both C-Brace and KAFO/SCO wearers to ensure that subjects can properly use both devices before the cross-over home use period. The second follow-up data collection will occur after 3-months of the cross-over home use period. At the end of the study, the patients can choose to keep the C-Brace for up to 24 months until reimbursement or to return to their original KAFO/SCO.

Interventions

DEVICEC-Brace

The C-Brace consists of individually fabricated thigh, calf and foot components. An ankle joint, unilateral or bilateral fitting, or an individual spring element connects the foot and calf components. The sensor system continuously measures the flexion of the knee joint and its angular acceleration. This allows the C-Brace to detect the user's current walking phase, so it can regulate the hydraulic resistances as well as control the flexion and extension of the knee joint.

DEVICEKAFO/SCO

Current knee ankle foot orthosis that the subject was wearing at baseline

Sponsors

Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective international multi-center, open-labeled randomized, controlled cross-over trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has been tested with the Trial Tool (DTO) and demonstrated the potential to utilize the C-Brace successfully * Patient has a BBS score \< 45 * Lower limb functional impairment according to CE label wording * Prior active and compliant use of unilateral or bilateral KAFO or SCO in the past 3 months prior to enrollment in the study * Patient meets minimum physical requirements to be fitted with a C-Brace, such as muscle status, joint mobility, leg axis and proper control of the orthosis must be guaranteed. * The User must fulfill the physical and mental requirements for perceiving optical/acoustic signals and/or mechanical vibrations * The existing muscle strength of the hip extensors and flexors must permit the controlled swing-through of the limb (compensation using the hip is possible). * Patient´s commitment to use C-Brace 2 at least 1-2 hours per day 5 days per week- * Patient is ≥ 18 years old * Patient is willing and able to independently provide informed consent. * Person is willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who is not able to follow the entire study visits or is unwilling/unable to follow the instructions * Patient was not able to use DTO * Patient who is not using an orthosis at least 1 to 2 hours/ day for 5 days per week * Patient with body weight \> 125 kg (includes body weight and heaviest object (weight) carried) * Patient with Orthoprosthesis * Patient with flexion contracture in the knee and/or hip joint in excess of 10° * Patient with uncontrolled moderate to severe spasticity (relative contraindication moderate spasticity) * Leg length discrepancy in excess of 15 cm * Patient with unstable neurological or cardiovascular/pulmonary disease, cancer * Pregnancy * Patient using a C-Brace * Patient with known vertigo or with history of falls unrelated to orthosis use or unrelated to motor disability * Patient who has never been fitted an orthosis before * Patient is not able to answer the self-administered questionnaires independently; for patients with upper extremity impairment is it allowed to verbally answer the questions. * Patient participating already in a study during this study´s duration * Patient participated in earlier C-Brace studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Efficacy: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodThe Berg Balance Scale is a 14-item scale designed to measure static and dynamic balance in adults in a clinical setting. The range in score for the BBS is 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance. Points for each item are deducted if the time or distance requirements are not met, the patient's performance requires supervision, or the patient requires assistance from support or examiner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic Gait Index (DGI)Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodAn 8-item test used to assess balance during walking tasks. It has a maximum score of 24 with each item being scored 0-3. A higher score indicates greater balance, and subjects lose a a point on all items for which an assistive device is needed.
6-minute Walk TestBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodDistance walked in 6 minutes over 12-meter back-and-forth pathway as a measure of functional exercise capacity.
Stair Assessment Index (SAI) - DownBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodA 14-point ordinal scale (0 - 13) used to assess different gait patterns during descent of stairs. The range of total scores for the SAI is from 0 to 26, with a higher score indicating a more normative gait pattern and needing less assistance.
Frequency of FallingBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodFrequency of falling by using C-Brace compared to KAFO/SCO as measured by the number of falls in 3-month period by recollection at baseline and recorded in a Falls Diary during home-use periods
Fear of FallingBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodTwo questions on patients' fear of falling indoors and outdoors based on an 11-point scale (0 = no fear, 10 = max. fear). The total score will range from 0 to 20, with 20 being maximum fear of falling.
Probability of Falling More Than Once When Using C-Brace Compared to KAFO/SCO3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodProportion of subjects having reported falling more than once will be compared between KAFO and C-Brace home-use periods
Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) ScaleBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodAssessment of patient-perceived balance confidence for 16 activities of daily living. For each activity, subjects rate their level of confidence in doing the activity without losing their balance or becoming unsteady on a scale from 0% to 100%, with 100% being the highest level of confidence. The total score for the ABC scale is an average of all activity scores.
EQ-5D-5LBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodMeasure of health status composed of 5 dimensions: mobility, ability to self-care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-point scale indicating the level of perceived problems for each dimension (level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 indicating extreme problems). The raw score is then aggregated and normalized based on region to a 0 to 1 scale (where 0 represents maximum issues and 1 represents no problems).
Work Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period25-item questionnaire to evaluate at-work disability and productivity loss under four sub-scales: time demands, physical demands, mental/interpersonal demands, and output demands. Scale scores range from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time).
Orthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use periodA self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the outcome of orthotic and prosthetic services. Three of the five domains will be administered: lower extremity functional status (20 items, score ranges from 0 - 80, with high score being easier), health-related quality of life index (23 items, score ranges from 0 - 92, with higher score being better) and satisfaction with device (11 items, score ranges from 11 - 55, with higher score being more satisfaction) scales. The domains of upper limb functional measure and satisfaction with service are not applicable in this study.
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period36-item scale constructed to survey health status and quality of life. It assesses eight health concept scales: physical functioning, role functioning/physical, role functioning/emotional, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain and general health. Each scale score ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the highest (better) score.
Quebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period12-item instrument used to assess satisfaction with a specific assistive device. Each questions is rated on a 5-point scale, with 1=not satisfied at all and 5=very satisfied. The first 8 questions comprise the Device subscale and the last 4, the Services subscale. Each subscale and the total score are presented as averages ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing greater satisfaction.
Patient-Related Outcome Questions3 months after cross-over home use periodTwo questions asking how the specific orthoses affected activities they enjoy and their quality of life. Each question is on a 5-point scale, with 1=much worse and 5=much better.
Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index QuestionnaireBaseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period11 items measuring satisfaction regarding perceived physical functioning, and social and emotional life. Higher scores represent higher levels of participation. The range of the adjusted total score is 0 to 100.

Countries

Austria, Germany, Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Potential participants were pre-screened based on their medical and/or orthotic records. After signing a written informed consent, participants were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The screening process comprised a thorough patient evaluation and a test with the functional C-Brace trial tool to check whether the potential study participant was able to initiate swing and utilize controlled knee flexion during weight bearing.

Pre-assignment details

149 subjects were enrolled, and 41 failed screening (27 due to BBS score above 44, 11 failed the C-Brace trial tool assessment, 1 had a contraindication for the C-Brace, 1 had a history of vertigo, and 1 was geographically inaccessible). In addition, another 6 subjects dropped out after screening, but prior to randomization. Reasons for these early dropouts were lack of time (2) and personal problems (1) resulting in 102 patients randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
KAFO/SCO, Then C-Brace
Home use of 3 months with existing knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) or existing stance control orthosis (SCO) KAFO/SCO: Current knee ankle foot orthosis that the subject was wearing at baseline Crossover immediately after first home-use period to being fit with C-Brace, receiving training, and starting 3-month home-use period as soon as the subject demonstrates he/she is able to use it safely.
52
C-Brace, Then KAFO/SCO
Home use of 3 months with newly fitted C-Brace microprocessor-controlled stance and swing control orthosis. C-Brace: The C-Brace consists of individually fabricated thigh, calf and foot components. An ankle joint, unilateral or bilateral fitting, or an individual spring element connects the foot and calf components. The sensor system continuously measures the flexion of the knee joint and its angular acceleration. This allows the C-Brace to detect the user's current walking phase, so it can regulate the hydraulic resistances as well as control the flexion and extension of the knee joint. Crossover to wearing previous KAFO/SCO, receives training if necessary, wears KAFO/SCO for a 1-month washout period then starting 3-month KAFO/SCO home-use period.
50
Total102

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 1Adverse Event01
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 1Lack of access to site during COVID01
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 1Lack of Efficacy01
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 1Lost to Follow-up10
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 1Withdrawal by Subject10
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 2Adverse Event20
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 2Lack of access to site during COVID10
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 2Lack of Efficacy10
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 2Lost to Follow-up10
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 2Personal problems01
Fitting/Assessment Prior to Home Use 2Withdrawal by Subject10
Home Use 1 (3 Months)Adverse Event12
Home Use 1 (3 Months)Lack of Efficacy01
Home Use 1 (3 Months)Protocol Violation10
Home Use 1 (3 Months)Withdrawal by Subject10
Home Use 2 (3 Months)Adverse Event11
Home Use 2 (3 Months)Could not cope with KAFO after C-Brace01
Home Use 2 (3 Months)Death20
Home Use 2 (3 Months)Lack of Efficacy10
Home Use 2 (3 Months)Lost to Follow-up20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicC-Brace, Then KAFO/SCOTotalKAFO/SCO, Then C-Brace
Age, Continuous55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Body Weight82.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
80.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
77.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
Height170.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
170.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
170.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
38 Participants78 Participants40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
24 participants52 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
3 participants7 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants42 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants45 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants57 Participants26 Participants
Side/bilateral orthosis
Bilateral
6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants
Side/bilateral orthosis
Left
21 Participants47 Participants26 Participants
Side/bilateral orthosis
Right
23 Participants41 Participants18 Participants
Type of orthosis used before study and as control
Locked KAFO
23 participants45 participants22 participants
Type of orthosis used before study and as control
Other
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Type of orthosis used before study and as control
Posterior-offset KAFO
14 participants29 participants15 participants
Type of orthosis used before study and as control
SCO (electrical)
5 participants14 participants9 participants
Type of orthosis used before study and as control
SCO (mechanical)
13 participants24 participants11 participants
Use of walking aids inside
No
20 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Use of walking aids inside
Yes
30 Participants61 Participants31 Participants
Use of walking aids outside
No
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Use of walking aids outside
Yes
42 Participants86 Participants44 Participants
Work/employment status
Employed
25 Participants42 Participants17 Participants
Work/employment status
Retired
21 Participants43 Participants22 Participants
Work/employment status
Unemployed
4 Participants17 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1022 / 88
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 10257 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 1026 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Efficacy: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

The Berg Balance Scale is a 14-item scale designed to measure static and dynamic balance in adults in a clinical setting. The range in score for the BBS is 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance. Points for each item are deducted if the time or distance requirements are not met, the patient's performance requires supervision, or the patient requires assistance from support or examiner.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselinePrimary Efficacy: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)33.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
KAFOPrimary Efficacy: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)37.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
C-BracePrimary Efficacy: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)42.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Comparison: H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.0002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - Baseline) \<= 0.p-value: <0.00001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: KAFO vs. Baseline -- H0: the mean difference (KAFO - Baseline) \<= 0.p-value: <0.00001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

6-minute Walk Test

Distance walked in 6 minutes over 12-meter back-and-forth pathway as a measure of functional exercise capacity.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Baseline6-minute Walk Test204.9 metersStandard Deviation 73.9
KAFO6-minute Walk Test213.7 metersStandard Deviation 80.9
C-Brace6-minute Walk Test226.0 metersStandard Deviation 84.3
Comparison: H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.583Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale

Assessment of patient-perceived balance confidence for 16 activities of daily living. For each activity, subjects rate their level of confidence in doing the activity without losing their balance or becoming unsteady on a scale from 0% to 100%, with 100% being the highest level of confidence. The total score for the ABC scale is an average of all activity scores.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineActivity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale53.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
KAFOActivity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale51.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
C-BraceActivity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale62.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Comparison: H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0p-value: 0.005t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Dynamic Gait Index (DGI)

An 8-item test used to assess balance during walking tasks. It has a maximum score of 24 with each item being scored 0-3. A higher score indicates greater balance, and subjects lose a a point on all items for which an assistive device is needed.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineDynamic Gait Index (DGI)12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
KAFODynamic Gait Index (DGI)13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
C-BraceDynamic Gait Index (DGI)15.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Comparison: H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.005t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L

Measure of health status composed of 5 dimensions: mobility, ability to self-care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-point scale indicating the level of perceived problems for each dimension (level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 indicating extreme problems). The raw score is then aggregated and normalized based on region to a 0 to 1 scale (where 0 represents maximum issues and 1 represents no problems).

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineEQ-5D-5L0.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
KAFOEQ-5D-5L0.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
C-BraceEQ-5D-5L0.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Comparison: H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0p-value: 0.151Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Fear of Falling

Two questions on patients' fear of falling indoors and outdoors based on an 11-point scale (0 = no fear, 10 = max. fear). The total score will range from 0 to 20, with 20 being maximum fear of falling.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineFear of FallingFear of falling indoors3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
BaselineFear of FallingFear of falling outdoors5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
KAFOFear of FallingFear of falling indoors3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
KAFOFear of FallingFear of falling outdoors5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
C-BraceFear of FallingFear of falling indoors2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
C-BraceFear of FallingFear of falling outdoors4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Comparison: H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0. (Fear of falling - indoors)p-value: 0.0023Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.0066Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Frequency of Falling

Frequency of falling by using C-Brace compared to KAFO/SCO as measured by the number of falls in 3-month period by recollection at baseline and recorded in a Falls Diary during home-use periods

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineFrequency of Falling4.9 number of falls in a three month periodStandard Deviation 20.1
KAFOFrequency of Falling4.0 number of falls in a three month periodStandard Deviation 16.8
C-BraceFrequency of Falling1.1 number of falls in a three month periodStandard Deviation 3.3
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)

36-item scale constructed to survey health status and quality of life. It assesses eight health concept scales: physical functioning, role functioning/physical, role functioning/emotional, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain and general health. Each scale score ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the highest (better) score.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group. If one or more items in a subscale were not answered, the patient was excluded from the analysis of that particular subscale.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Health Change47.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Social Functioning74.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Physical Functioning29.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Pain55.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Emotional Wellbeing76.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Role limitations due to physical health36.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.7
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)General Health54.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Energy/Fatigue52.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
BaselineMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Role limitations due to emotional problems78.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.9
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Pain57.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Emotional Wellbeing75.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Energy/Fatigue52.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)General Health54.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Health Change48.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Physical Functioning31.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Role limitations due to emotional problems82.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.3
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Role limitations due to physical health44.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.2
KAFOMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Social Functioning75.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)General Health58.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Emotional Wellbeing79.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.16
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Role limitations due to emotional problems86.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Energy/Fatigue56.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Social Functioning77.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Pain59.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Health Change56.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Role limitations due to physical health51.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.2
C-BraceMedical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)Physical Functioning44.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Comparison: Emotional well-being. H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.0226t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Energy/Fatigue. H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Health change. H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.0049Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Comparison: Physical Functioning Score. H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0p-value: 0.0000647t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Orthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)

A self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the outcome of orthotic and prosthetic services. Three of the five domains will be administered: lower extremity functional status (20 items, score ranges from 0 - 80, with high score being easier), health-related quality of life index (23 items, score ranges from 0 - 92, with higher score being better) and satisfaction with device (11 items, score ranges from 11 - 55, with higher score being more satisfaction) scales. The domains of upper limb functional measure and satisfaction with service are not applicable in this study.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group. If one or more items in a subscale were not answered, the patient was excluded from the analysis of that particular subscale.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Lower Extremity Functional Status45.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
BaselineOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Quality of Life56.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
BaselineOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Satisfaction with Device49.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
KAFOOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Lower Extremity Functional Status46.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
KAFOOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Quality of Life56.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
KAFOOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Satisfaction with Device50.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
C-BraceOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Quality of Life58.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
C-BraceOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Satisfaction with Device51.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
C-BraceOrthotics & Prosthetics User Survey (OPUS)Lower Extremity Functional Status48.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Comparison: OPUS - Low Extremity Functional Status. H0: the mean difference (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0p-value: 0.00019t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient-Related Outcome Questions

Two questions asking how the specific orthoses affected activities they enjoy and their quality of life. Each question is on a 5-point scale, with 1=much worse and 5=much better.

Time frame: 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Subjects that answered the patient-reported outcome questions after having completed home-use periods with both KAFO/SCO and C-Brace (at Visit 2). 75 subjects provided answers to these questions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BaselinePatient-Related Outcome QuestionsTo what extent has the C-Brace enabled you to engage in the activities that you enjoy?4 units on a scale
BaselinePatient-Related Outcome QuestionsTo what extent has the C-Brace impacted your quality of life?4 units on a scale
KAFOPatient-Related Outcome QuestionsTo what extent has the C-Brace enabled you to engage in the activities that you enjoy?4 units on a scale
KAFOPatient-Related Outcome QuestionsTo what extent has the C-Brace impacted your quality of life?4 units on a scale
Secondary

Probability of Falling More Than Once When Using C-Brace Compared to KAFO/SCO

Proportion of subjects having reported falling more than once will be compared between KAFO and C-Brace home-use periods

Time frame: 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Paired data including subjects with fall history after both KAFO and C-Brace home use periods

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BaselineProbability of Falling More Than Once When Using C-Brace Compared to KAFO/SCO25 Participants
KAFOProbability of Falling More Than Once When Using C-Brace Compared to KAFO/SCO12 Participants
Comparison: Paired dataset. H0: The probability of fallers wearing C-Brace becoming non-fallers wearing KAFO is the same as the probability of non-fallers wearing C-Brace becoming fallers wearing KAFO.p-value: 0.006McNemar
Secondary

Quebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)

12-item instrument used to assess satisfaction with a specific assistive device. Each questions is rated on a 5-point scale, with 1=not satisfied at all and 5=very satisfied. The first 8 questions comprise the Device subscale and the last 4, the Services subscale. Each subscale and the total score are presented as averages ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group. If one or more items in a subscale were not answered, the patient was excluded from the analysis of that particular subscale.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Service4.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
BaselineQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Device4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
BaselineQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Total4.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
KAFOQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Service4.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
KAFOQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Device4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
KAFOQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Total4.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
C-BraceQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Device4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
C-BraceQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Total4.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
C-BraceQuebec User Evaluation on Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST)Service4.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Comparison: Device. H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0p-value: 0.301Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index Questionnaire

11 items measuring satisfaction regarding perceived physical functioning, and social and emotional life. Higher scores represent higher levels of participation. The range of the adjusted total score is 0 to 100.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineReintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index Questionnaire71.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
KAFOReintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index Questionnaire71.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
C-BraceReintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index Questionnaire74.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
Comparison: H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0.p-value: 0.08Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Stair Assessment Index (SAI) - Down

A 14-point ordinal scale (0 - 13) used to assess different gait patterns during descent of stairs. The range of total scores for the SAI is from 0 to 26, with a higher score indicating a more normative gait pattern and needing less assistance.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineStair Assessment Index (SAI) - Down4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
KAFOStair Assessment Index (SAI) - Down4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
C-BraceStair Assessment Index (SAI) - Down6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Comparison: H0: the median of the population differences (C-Brace - KAFO) \<= 0. (SAI - Down)p-value: 0.0078Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Work Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25

25-item questionnaire to evaluate at-work disability and productivity loss under four sub-scales: time demands, physical demands, mental/interpersonal demands, and output demands. Scale scores range from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time).

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after initial home use period, and 3 months after cross-over home use period

Population: Intention to Treat Group. If one or more items in a subscale were not answered, the patient was excluded from the analysis of that particular subscale.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Mental/Interpersonal86.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
BaselineWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Output82.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
BaselineWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Physical37.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
BaselineWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Time79.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
KAFOWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Time78.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
KAFOWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Mental/Interpersonal88.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
KAFOWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Physical34.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
KAFOWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Output81.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
C-BraceWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Time79.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
C-BraceWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Output84.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
C-BraceWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Physical24.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
C-BraceWork Limitations Questionnaires WLQ-25Mental/Interpersonal91.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Comparison: WLQ-25 - Physicalp-value: 0.281t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026