Skip to content

Crestal Bone Level After Allogenic Bone Ring With Simultaneous Dental Implant Placement

Evaluation Of Crestal Bone Level After Alveolar Bone Augmentation of Atrophied Posterior Mandibular Region Using Allogenic Bone Rings Vs. Autogenous Bone Rings With Simultaneous Dental Implant Placement (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03906591
Enrollment
28
Registered
2019-04-08
Start date
2019-10-31
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2019-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allogenic Bone Ring

Brief summary

This trial is aiming to answer a question whether in Patients with severely atrophied, distal mandibular regions, the use of allogenic bone rings with simultaneous dental implants, compared to autogenous bone rings, give successful clinical and radiographic outcomes without donor site morbidity

Interventions

PROCEDUREallogenic bone ring

allogenic bone ring with simultaneous dental implant placement

PROCEDUREautogenous bone ring

autogenous bone ring with simultaneous dental implant placement

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Medically free form any systemic diseases that contraindicate the surgical procedures or affect predictable outcomes and non-smoker subjects. 2. Atrophic mandibular distal region requiring vertical augmentation. 3. Good oral hygiene and healthy keratinized mucosa.

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of acute dentoalveolar infection or any pathologic lesions. 2. Totally edentulous patients and patients requiring massive reconstruction and augmentation procedures. 3. Patients with history of previously failed augmentation procedures, or failed implant placement at the intended augmentation region.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in crestal bone heightat 6 monthscone beam computed tomography will be used to measure bone height in millimeters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
graft failureafter 1 week, 6 months and after 9 monthssigns of graft failure will be evaluated by clinical examination
implant lossafter 1 week, 6 months and after 9 monthssigns of implant loss will be evaluated by clinical examination

Contacts

Primary Contactalaa ragab, master
dralaa3@hotmail.com00201224665688
Backup ContactSherif Aly, PhD
Sherief.ali@hotmail.com00201001932020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026