Skip to content

AScalate: Treat-to-target in Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Randomized, Open Label Multicenter Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of a Treat-to-target (T2T) Treatment Strategy With Secukinumab (AIN457) as a First-line Biologic Compared to a Standard-of-care (SOC) Treatment Over 36 Weeks in Patients With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03906136
Acronym
AScalate
Enrollment
304
Registered
2019-04-08
Start date
2019-06-04
Completion date
2022-09-22
Last updated
2025-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Keywords

axial spondyloarthritis, axSpA, treat-to-target, T2T, secukinumab, AIN457, Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, nr-axSpA, Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, r-axSpA

Brief summary

This was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter study in patients with active axSpA. The aim of the study was to demonstrate that the efficacy of a T2T approach (with secukinumab as a first-line biologic) was superior to a SOC approach in terms of achieving strong clinical efficacy in patients with active axSpA who were naïve to biological therapy and who had an inadequate response to prior non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment.

Detailed description

The study included an 8-week Screening period, a 36-week treatment period, and a 20-week safety follow-up period. Neither investigators nor patients were blinded. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving an ASAS40 response at Week 24. At Baseline, patients were randomized equally to one of two treatment groups (T2T or SOC). Patients were evaluated every 12 weeks from Baseline through to Week 36. Safety evaluations were included in the regular visits; in addition, a safety follow-up visit was performed 20 weeks after the last study visit (i.e. Week 36) and took place at Week 56 for patients completing the study according to the protocol. Patients assigned to the SOC treatment group received SOC treatment at the discretion of the investigator in accordance with current clinical practice. Patients assigned to the T2T treatment group received first line biological treatment with secukinumab 150 mg. Responders were defined as those patients with an ASDAS clinically important improvement of ≥ 1.1. At week 12 responders continued secukinumab 150 mg, whereas treatment was escalated to 300 mg for non-responders. At week 24, disease activity was assessed again. Patients who qualify as responders continued the treatment they received prior (either secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg), patients who were non-responders at week 24 were escalated in treatment: patients who received secukinumab 300 mg before were switched to Adalimumab, and patients who received secukinumab 150mg before were escalated to secukinumab 300mg.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSecukinumab/Adalimumab-Biosimilar

Secukinumab 150 mg, s.c. Secukinumab 300 mg, s.c. Adalimumab biosimilar 40 mg, s.c.

OTHERStandard-of-care

Treatment according to local practice standards by the rheumatologist following latest treatment recommendations with NSAIDs as the first-choice drug treatment and DMARDs for patients with active disease despite the use (or intolerance/contraindication) of NSAIDs.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis, axSpA (either Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis or Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis) fulfilling the Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for axSpA * Active disease as defined by having an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ≥ 2.1 at Screening and Baseline despite concurrent Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) therapy, or intolerance/contraindication to NSAIDs. * Objective signs of inflammation at Screening as defined by: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints performed up to 3 months prior to screening showing acute inflammatory lesion(s), OR elevated quick C-reactive Protein (CRP) (\> 5 mg/L), OR MRI showing acute inflammatory lesion(s) in the sacroiliac joints and spine performed during screening period. * Inadequate response to NSAIDs

Exclusion criteria

* Previous exposure to secukinumab or other biologic drug directly targeting Interleukin(IL)-17 or IL-17 receptor. * Patients who have previously been treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha inhibitors (investigational or approved). * Patients treated with any cell-depleting therapies. * Active ongoing inflammatory diseases or underlying metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal conditions, which in the opinion of the investigator immunosuppressed the patient and/or places the patient at unacceptable risk for participation in an immunomodulatory therapy. * History of clinically significant liver disease or liver injury * History of renal trauma, glomerulonephritis, or patients with one kidney only, or a serum creatinine level exceeding 1.8 mg/dL (159.12 μmol/L). * Active systemic infections during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to randomization. * History of ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease or evidence of tuberculosis (TB) infection * Patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or hepatitis C * Life vaccinations within 6 weeks prior to Baseline or planned vaccination during study participation until 12 weeks after last study treatment administration. Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 24Baseline, Week 24Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consists of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consists of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.
Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS20 ResponseBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consist of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.
Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS): 6 domains (4 main; 2 additional assessment domains): 1. Patient's global assessment measured on a visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Patient's assessment of back pain, measured on a VAS; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions as measured by VAS; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) as measured by VAS; 5. Spinal mobility represented by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) lateral spinal flexion assessment; 6. C-reactive protein (CRP, acute phase reactant). ASAS partial remission: a value not above 2 units in each of the four main domains on a scale of 10. Higher score on VAS = higher severity. Percentage calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick CRP + baseline weight.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24BASMI measures the range of motion based on five clinical measurements: 1) cervical rotation, 2) tragus to wall distance, 3) lumbar side flexion, 4) lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) and 5) intermalleolar distance. BASMI 0 = indicates mild disease involvement, 1 = moderate disease, and 2 = severe disease involvement. The results for cervical rotation and lumbar side flexion are the means of the left and right measurements. Scoring range 0-10. The higher the BASMI score, the more severe was the subject's limitation of movement.
Percentage of Patients Meeting the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Definition of Inactive DiseaseBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24Parameters used for the ASDAS include spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI question 2), the patient's global assessment of disease activity, peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6) and C-reactive Protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate). The 3 values selected to separate disease activity states were \< 1.3 between inactive disease and low disease activity, \< 2.1 between low disease activity and high disease activity, and \> 3.5 between high disease activity and very high disease activity. Selected cutoffs for improvement scores were a change of ≥ 1.1 unit for minimal clinically important improvement and a change of ≥ 2.0 units for major improvement. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline ASDAS + baseline weight.
Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Major ImprovementBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24Parameters used for the ASDAS include spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI question 2), the patient's global assessment of disease activity, peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6) and C-reactive Protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate). The 3 values selected to separate disease activity states were \< 1.3 between inactive disease and low disease activity, \< 2.1 between low disease activity and high disease activity, and \> 3.5 between high disease activity and very high disease activity. Selected cutoffs for improvement scores were a change of ≥ 1.1 unit for minimal clinically important improvement and a change of ≥ 2.0 units for major improvement. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline ASDAS + baseline weight.
Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24Chest expansion is measured as the cervical rotation angle (in degrees).
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Response 50% (BASDAI 50) at Week 12 and Week 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24The BASDAI consists of a 0 through 10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem, captured as a continuous VAS), which is used to answer 6 questions pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of the disease. BASDAI 50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease) in total BASDAI score.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is a set of 10 questions designed to determine the degree of functional limitation in those patients with AS. The 10 questions were chosen with major input from patients with AS. The first 8 questions consider activities related to functional anatomy. The final 2 questions assess the patients' ability to cope with everyday life. A 0 through 10 scale (captured as a continuous VAS) is used to answer the questions. The mean of the 10 scales gives the BASFI score - a value between 0 and 10. A higher score on the VAS signifies higher severity.
Change From Baseline in the ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Instrument)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scores (ASQoL) is a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. The ASQoL contains 18 items with a dichotomous yes/no response option. A single point is assigned for each yes response and no points for each no response resulting in overall scores that range from 0 (least severity) to 18 (highest severity). As such, lower score indicate better quality of life. Items include an assessment of mobility/energy, self-care and mood/emotion. The recall period is at the moment, and the measure requires approximately 6 minutes to complete.
Change From Baseline in ASAS-HI (Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24The ASAS-HI is a disease-specific questionnaire that was developed based on the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set (also known as the ICF Core Set) for AS. The ASAS HI is a linear composite measure and contains 17 items (dichotomous response option: I agree and I do not agree), which cover most of the ICF Core Set. The ASAS HI contains items addressing categories of pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self-care, and community life. The total sum of the ASAS HI ranges from 0 to 17, with a lower score indicating a better health status. In addition, the Environmental Factor (EF) Item Set contains items addressing categories of support/relationships, attitudes and health services. The EF Item Set contains 9 dichotomous items with an identical response option but without a sum score because of its multidimensional nature.
Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Patient)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm (visual analog scale) VAS, ranging from not severe (0 mm) to very severe (100 mm), in response to the question, How active was your disease on average during the last week? A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Physician)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm VAS, ranging from not severe (0 mm) to very severe (100 mm), in response to the question, Considering all the ways the disease affects your patient, draw a line on the scale for how well his or her condition is today. To enhance objectivity, the physician must not be aware of the specific patient's global assessment of disease activity when performing his own assessment on that patient. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24Parameters used for the ASDAS include spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI question 2), the patient's global assessment of disease activity, peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6) and C-reactive Protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate). The 3 values selected to separate disease activity states were \< 1.3 between inactive disease and low disease activity, \< 2.1 between low disease activity and high disease activity, and \> 3.5 between high disease activity and very high disease activity. Selected cutoffs for improvement scores were a change of ≥ 1.1 unit for minimal clinically important improvement and a change of ≥ 2.0 units for major improvement. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline ASDAS + baseline weight.

Countries

France, Germany

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study included an 8-week Screening period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treat-to-Target (T2T)
Participants received secukinumab at a dose of 150 milligrams (mg) as subcutaneous (s.c.) injection at 150 mg dose at Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8. From Week 12, only responders continued to receive 4-weekly doses until Week 32 if they maintained the response. In the event these patients experienced a loss of response from Week 24, they were escalated to secukinumab 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks until Week 32. Patients who were non-responders at Week 12 received 4-weekly secukinumab 300 mg s.c. until Week 24. From Week 24, only responders continued to receive 4-weekly secukinumab 300 mg s.c. until Week 32. Patients who were non-responders to secukinumab 300 mg at Week 24 received biweekly adalimumab biosimilar 40 mg s.c. until Week 34.
155
Standard-of-care (SOC)
Patients received treatment according to local practice standards by their treating physician following the current treatment recommendations
149
Total304

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up74
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreat-to-Target (T2T)Standard-of-care (SOC)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
149 Participants144 Participants293 Participants
Age, Continuous40.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.03
38.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.17
39.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
26 Participants33 Participants59 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
128 Participants114 Participants242 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants51 Participants110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants98 Participants194 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1900 / 920 / 1160 / 1280 / 303
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 19038 / 9235 / 11636 / 12898 / 303
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 1904 / 925 / 1168 / 12816 / 303

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 24

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consists of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 2440.1 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 2449.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.11995% CI: [0.43, 1.1]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS-HI (Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index)

The ASAS-HI is a disease-specific questionnaire that was developed based on the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set (also known as the ICF Core Set) for AS. The ASAS HI is a linear composite measure and contains 17 items (dichotomous response option: I agree and I do not agree), which cover most of the ICF Core Set. The ASAS HI contains items addressing categories of pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self-care, and community life. The total sum of the ASAS HI ranges from 0 to 17, with a lower score indicating a better health status. In addition, the Environmental Factor (EF) Item Set contains items addressing categories of support/relationships, attitudes and health services. The EF Item Set contains 9 dichotomous items with an identical response option but without a sum score because of its multidimensional nature.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in ASAS-HI (Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index)Week 12-2.55 Scores on a scale
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in ASAS-HI (Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index)Week 24-3.24 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in ASAS-HI (Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index)Week 12-2.81 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in ASAS-HI (Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index)Week 24-3.07 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.47795% CI: [-0.46, 0.97]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.6695% CI: [-0.92, 0.58]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is a set of 10 questions designed to determine the degree of functional limitation in those patients with AS. The 10 questions were chosen with major input from patients with AS. The first 8 questions consider activities related to functional anatomy. The final 2 questions assess the patients' ability to cope with everyday life. A 0 through 10 scale (captured as a continuous VAS) is used to answer the questions. The mean of the 10 scales gives the BASFI score - a value between 0 and 10. A higher score on the VAS signifies higher severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 12-1.69 Scores on a scale
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 24-1.97 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 12-1.99 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 24-2.33 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.20595% CI: [-0.16, 0.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.10895% CI: [-0.08, 0.82]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

BASMI measures the range of motion based on five clinical measurements: 1) cervical rotation, 2) tragus to wall distance, 3) lumbar side flexion, 4) lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) and 5) intermalleolar distance. BASMI 0 = indicates mild disease involvement, 1 = moderate disease, and 2 = severe disease involvement. The results for cervical rotation and lumbar side flexion are the means of the left and right measurements. Scoring range 0-10. The higher the BASMI score, the more severe was the subject's limitation of movement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Week 12-0.32 Scores on a scale
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Week 24-0.41 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Week 24-0.35 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Week 12-0.38 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.52595% CI: [-0.12, 0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.57795% CI: [-0.25, 0.14]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion

Chest expansion is measured as the cervical rotation angle (in degrees).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionWeek 120.46 degrees
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionWeek 240.47 degrees
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionWeek 121.35 degrees
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Chest ExpansionWeek 240.57 degrees
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.2295% CI: [-2.32, 0.54]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.74595% CI: [-0.7, 0.5]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Patient)

The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm (visual analog scale) VAS, ranging from not severe (0 mm) to very severe (100 mm), in response to the question, How active was your disease on average during the last week? A higher score indicates more disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Patient)Week 12-2.95 Scores on a scale
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Patient)Week 24-3.27 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Patient)Week 12-3.12 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Patient)Week 24-3.48 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.58695% CI: [-0.45, 0.79]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.49195% CI: [-0.39, 0.82]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Physician)

The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm VAS, ranging from not severe (0 mm) to very severe (100 mm), in response to the question, Considering all the ways the disease affects your patient, draw a line on the scale for how well his or her condition is today. To enhance objectivity, the physician must not be aware of the specific patient's global assessment of disease activity when performing his own assessment on that patient. A higher score indicates more disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Physician)Week 12-32.46 Scores on a scale
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Physician)Week 24-35.81 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Physician)Week 24-38.54 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Global Disease Assessment (Physician)Week 12-36.96 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.08295% CI: [-0.58, 9.56]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.29295% CI: [-2.35, 7.81]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Instrument)

The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scores (ASQoL) is a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. The ASQoL contains 18 items with a dichotomous yes/no response option. A single point is assigned for each yes response and no points for each no response resulting in overall scores that range from 0 (least severity) to 18 (highest severity). As such, lower score indicate better quality of life. Items include an assessment of mobility/energy, self-care and mood/emotion. The recall period is at the moment, and the measure requires approximately 6 minutes to complete.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in the ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Instrument)Week 24-4.21 Scores on a scale
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in the ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Instrument)Week 12-3.52 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in the ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Instrument)Week 24-3.84 Scores on a scale
Standard-of-care (SOC)Change From Baseline in the ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Instrument)Week 12-3.39 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.76895% CI: [-1.01, 0.74]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.45195% CI: [-1.34, 0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 12

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consists of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 1234.0 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 1246.6 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.02995% CI: [0.37, 0.95]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS20 Response

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consist of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS20 ResponseWeek 24 n=144,13962.1 Percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS20 ResponseWeek 12 n=147,14351.8 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS20 ResponseWeek 12 n=147,14360.1 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS20 ResponseWeek 24 n=144,13965.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.56295% CI: [0.54, 1.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.15495% CI: [0.45, 1.14]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS Partial Remission

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS): 6 domains (4 main; 2 additional assessment domains): 1. Patient's global assessment measured on a visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Patient's assessment of back pain, measured on a VAS; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions as measured by VAS; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) as measured by VAS; 5. Spinal mobility represented by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) lateral spinal flexion assessment; 6. C-reactive protein (CRP, acute phase reactant). ASAS partial remission: a value not above 2 units in each of the four main domains on a scale of 10. Higher score on VAS = higher severity. Percentage calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick CRP + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 12 n=149, 14318.2 Percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 24 n=146,13922.8 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 12 n=149, 14329.0 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 24 n=146,13928.5 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.02995% CI: [0.32, 0.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.26495% CI: [0.44, 1.25]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Response 50% (BASDAI 50) at Week 12 and Week 24

The BASDAI consists of a 0 through 10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem, captured as a continuous VAS), which is used to answer 6 questions pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of the disease. BASDAI 50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease) in total BASDAI score.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Response 50% (BASDAI 50) at Week 12 and Week 24Week 1238.0 Percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Achieving the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Response 50% (BASDAI 50) at Week 12 and Week 24Week 2442.5 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Response 50% (BASDAI 50) at Week 12 and Week 24Week 1242.0 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Achieving the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index Response 50% (BASDAI 50) at Week 12 and Week 24Week 2442.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.47795% CI: [0.53, 1.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.96895% CI: [0.63, 1.61]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Meeting the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Definition of Inactive Disease

Parameters used for the ASDAS include spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI question 2), the patient's global assessment of disease activity, peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6) and C-reactive Protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate). The 3 values selected to separate disease activity states were \< 1.3 between inactive disease and low disease activity, \< 2.1 between low disease activity and high disease activity, and \> 3.5 between high disease activity and very high disease activity. Selected cutoffs for improvement scores were a change of ≥ 1.1 unit for minimal clinically important improvement and a change of ≥ 2.0 units for major improvement. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline ASDAS + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Meeting the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Definition of Inactive DiseaseWeek 12 n=151,14119.8 Percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients Meeting the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Definition of Inactive DiseaseWeek 24 n=146,13618.8 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Meeting the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Definition of Inactive DiseaseWeek 12 n=151,14133.3 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients Meeting the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Definition of Inactive DiseaseWeek 24 n=146,13633.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.00895% CI: [0.29, 0.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.00595% CI: [0.28, 0.8]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Low Disease Activity

Parameters used for the ASDAS include spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI question 2), the patient's global assessment of disease activity, peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6) and C-reactive Protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate). The 3 values selected to separate disease activity states were \< 1.3 between inactive disease and low disease activity, \< 2.1 between low disease activity and high disease activity, and \> 3.5 between high disease activity and very high disease activity. Selected cutoffs for improvement scores were a change of ≥ 1.1 unit for minimal clinically important improvement and a change of ≥ 2.0 units for major improvement. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline ASDAS + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 12 n=151,14146.5 Percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 24 n=146,13652.4 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 12 n=151,14157.7 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 24 n=146,13657.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.05595% CI: [0.4, 1.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.40995% CI: [0.52, 1.31]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Major Improvement

Parameters used for the ASDAS include spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASDAI question 2), the patient's global assessment of disease activity, peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6) and C-reactive Protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate). The 3 values selected to separate disease activity states were \< 1.3 between inactive disease and low disease activity, \< 2.1 between low disease activity and high disease activity, and \> 3.5 between high disease activity and very high disease activity. Selected cutoffs for improvement scores were a change of ≥ 1.1 unit for minimal clinically important improvement and a change of ≥ 2.0 units for major improvement. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline ASDAS + baseline weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS comprised all patients to whom study treatment/reference treatment was assigned by randomization. Data represent the number of patients with non-missing response at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Major ImprovementWeek 12 n=151,14119.8 Percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Major ImprovementWeek 24 n=146,13618.6 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Major ImprovementWeek 12 n=151,14125.6 Percentage of participants
Standard-of-care (SOC)Percentage of Patients With ASDAS Major ImprovementWeek 24 n=146,13627.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.26395% CI: [0.4, 1.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.10395% CI: [0.34, 1.1]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026