Skip to content

Phase 3 Study of Sitravatinib Plus Nivolumab vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination With Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Disease Progression On or After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy SAPPHIRE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03906071
Acronym
SAPPHIRE
Enrollment
577
Registered
2019-04-08
Start date
2019-07-15
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Sitravatinib, Nivolumab, Docetaxel, Checkpoint inhibitor, MGCD516, NSCLC, SAPPHIRE

Brief summary

This study will compare the efficacy of the investigational agent sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who have previously experienced disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Detailed description

Sitravatinib (MGCD516) is an orally-available, small molecule inhibitor of a closely related spectrum of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including MET, TAM (Tyro3, AXL, MERTK) family, VEGFR family, PDGFR family, KIT, FLT3, TRK family, RET, DDR2, and selected EPH family members. Nivolumab is a human IgG monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and selectively blocks the interaction with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby releasing PD-1 pathway mediated inhibition of the immune response, including anti-tumor immune response. RTKs have been implicated in mediating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which has emerged as a potential resistance mechanism to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Inhibition of these RTKs by sitravatinib may augment anti-tumor immune response and improve outcomes by overcoming resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNivolumab

Nivolumab is an antibody directed at the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), blocking its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2.

DRUGSitravatinib

Sitravatinib is a small molecule inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases.

DRUGDocetaxel

Docetaxel is an anti-neoplastic agent that acts by disrupting the microtubular network in cells.

Sponsors

Mirati Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer * Receipt of at least one but not more than two prior treatment regimens in the advanced setting * Prior treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy in combination or in sequence (i.e., platinum-based chemotheraphy followed by checkpoint inhibitor therapy) * Most recent treatment regimen must have included a checkpoint inhibitor therapy with radiographic disease progression on or after treatment * Candidate to receive docetaxel as second or third line therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled brain metastases * Tumors that have tested positive for EGFR, ROS1, ALK mutations, or ALK fusions * Unacceptable toxicity with prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy * Receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapy post checkpoint inhibitor therapy, other than maintenance chemotherapy * Impaired heart function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization date to date of death due to any cause (Up to approximately 44 months)OS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients who did not die on study are censored at the date of the last on-study follow-up that the patient was known to be alive (including follow-up data). Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 61 months)An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. Serious adverse events (SAE) are defined as any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Death).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationFrom first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 61 months)An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsFrom first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 59 months)The severity of hematology results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Hematology parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsFrom first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 59 months)The severity of chemistry results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Chemistry parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic AssessmentFrom randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 74 months)ORR is defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1 recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. Patients who cannot be assessed for response are counted as non-responders. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease; PR is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Duration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic AssessmentFrom randomization to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD (Up to approximately 74 months)DOR is defined as the time from date of the first documentation of confirmed objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.
Clinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic AssessmentFrom randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 74 months)CBR is defined as the percentage of patients documented to have a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or SD, according to RECIST 1.1 as the best response. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Stable Disease (SD) is concluded when the response does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression. Progression is defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic AssessmentFrom randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 74 months)PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Censoring was assigned on the date of the last tumor assessment if no assessment of tumor progression is identified and the patient does not die while on study. Patients with no evaluation of disease after first study treatment will have PFS censored on the date of randomization. Patients who start new anti-cancer therapy prior to documented PD will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment prior to the start of the new therapy. Results obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.
1-Year Survival RateAt 12 months from first dose1-Year Survival will be defined as the percentage of participants surviving at 1 year after the first dose. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Greenwood's formula (1980).
Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreClinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.The LCSS is a lung cancer specific measure of quality of life and includes 9 questions, including patient-reported ratings of six symptoms (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and three summary items (symptom distress, activity level, overall quality of life) using 100-mm visual analogue scales ranging from 0 (lowest rating) to 100 (highest rating) where a higher score represents a worse outcome. The average total score = is a sum of items 1 to 9 divided by the total number of items (sum of items 1 to 9) / 9).
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. The EQ-5D-5L health utility index (HUI) is assessed using the Crosswalk algorithm for France based on the individual responses to the 5 EQ-5D-5L domains ranging from -0.530 to 1.000. The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 0.08 points.
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is a component of the EQ-5D-5L and assesses the patient's self-rated health using a vertical visual analogue scale where numbered 0 (the worst health you can image) to 100 (the best health you can imageine). The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 7 points.
Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point0.5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1) and 5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1 and 15), and pre-dose on cycle 1 (day 15), and cycle 2, 3, and 5 (day 1)Sitravatinib plasma concentration by time point. 1 cycle = 28 days.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORBristol-Myers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nivolumab and Sitravatinib
Participants with Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer were administered with Nivolumab by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes at 240 milligram (mg) every 2 weeks or at 480 mg every 4 weeks at the discretion of the investigator . Sitravatinib capsules were administered at 100 mg orally, once daily.
284
Docetaxel
Participants with Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer were administered with Docetaxel by intravenous infusion at 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) over 1 hour every 3 weeks.
293
Total577

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNivolumab and SitravatinibTotalDocetaxel
Age, Continuous64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.48
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants30 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
219 Participants426 Participants207 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
53 Participants121 Participants68 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 participants16 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 participants22 participants14 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
14 participants32 participants18 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
34 participants80 participants46 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 participants7 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
5 participants9 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
211 participants409 participants198 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
114 Participants239 Participants125 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
170 Participants338 Participants168 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
202 / 284209 / 293
other
Total, other adverse events
275 / 281267 / 273
serious
Total, serious adverse events
128 / 281102 / 273

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients who did not die on study are censored at the date of the last on-study follow-up that the patient was known to be alive (including follow-up data). Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.

Time frame: From randomization date to date of death due to any cause (Up to approximately 44 months)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibOverall Survival (OS)12.22 Months
DocetaxelOverall Survival (OS)10.58 Months
p-value: 0.14495% CI: [0.7, 1.05]Log Rank
Secondary

1-Year Survival Rate

1-Year Survival will be defined as the percentage of participants surviving at 1 year after the first dose. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Greenwood's formula (1980).

Time frame: At 12 months from first dose

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nivolumab and Sitravatinib1-Year Survival Rate50.18 Percentage of participants
Docetaxel1-Year Survival Rate44.12 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)

The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. The EQ-5D-5L health utility index (HUI) is assessed using the Crosswalk algorithm for France based on the individual responses to the 5 EQ-5D-5L domains ranging from -0.530 to 1.000. The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 0.08 points.

Time frame: Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all randomized participants) with available scores for each assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 1 (Week 9)-0.09 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 2 (Week 17)-0.07 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 3 (Week 25)-0.10 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 4 (Week 33)-0.09 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 5 (Week 41)-0.08 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 6 (Week 49)-0.10 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 5 (Week 41)-0.12 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 1 (Week 9)-0.05 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 4 (Week 33)-0.09 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 2 (Week 17)-0.10 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 6 (Week 49)-0.15 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)Assessment 3 (Week 25)-0.15 Score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is a component of the EQ-5D-5L and assesses the patient's self-rated health using a vertical visual analogue scale where numbered 0 (the worst health you can image) to 100 (the best health you can imageine). The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 7 points.

Time frame: Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all randomized participants) with available scores for each assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 1 (Week 9)-4.74 Change in score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 2 (Week 17)-3.24 Change in score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 3 (Week 25)-3.37 Change in score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 4 (Week 33)-3.41 Change in score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 5 (Week 41)-3.55 Change in score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 6 (Week 49)-6.05 Change in score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 5 (Week 41)-2.89 Change in score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 1 (Week 9)-3.77 Change in score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 4 (Week 33)-2.71 Change in score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 2 (Week 17)-5.12 Change in score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 6 (Week 49)-4.17 Change in score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Assessment 3 (Week 25)-8.72 Change in score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score

The LCSS is a lung cancer specific measure of quality of life and includes 9 questions, including patient-reported ratings of six symptoms (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and three summary items (symptom distress, activity level, overall quality of life) using 100-mm visual analogue scales ranging from 0 (lowest rating) to 100 (highest rating). The average total score = is a sum of items 1 to 9 divided by the total number of items (sum of items 1 to 9) / 9).

Time frame: Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all randomized participants) with available scores for each assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 1 (Week 9)4.10 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 2 (Week 17)2.74 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 3 (Week 25)4.58 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 4 (Week 33)4.08 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 5 (Week 41)6.73 Score on a scale
Nivolumab and SitravatinibChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 6 (Week 49)3.91 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 5 (Week 41)5.12 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 1 (Week 9)2.75 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 4 (Week 33)5.83 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 2 (Week 17)5.78 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 6 (Week 49)10.85 Score on a scale
DocetaxelChange From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total ScoreAssessment 3 (Week 25)7.92 Score on a scale
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment

CBR is defined as the percentage of patients documented to have a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or SD, according to RECIST 1.1 as the best response. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Stable Disease (SD) is concluded when the response does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression. Progression is defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.

Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 44 months)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population: all patients who are randomized into this study and have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibClinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment75.5 Percentage of participants
DocetaxelClinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment64.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment

DOR is defined as the time from date of the first documentation of confirmed objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.

Time frame: From randomization to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD (Up to approximately 44 months)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all patients who are randomized into this study and have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline) with a confirmed objective response (CR or PR) per central radiographic assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibDuration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment7.43 Months
DocetaxelDuration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment7.10 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results

The severity of chemistry results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Chemistry parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment.

Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 36 months)

Population: Safety Population (all patients who received any dose of study medication) with at least 1 post-baseline result

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 1151 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 117 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 315 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 33 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 41 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 24 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 0217 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 134 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 31 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 220 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 32 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 41 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 0106 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 0189 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 184 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 0147 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 20 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 30 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 1105 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 0180 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 211 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 0181 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 210 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 141 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 39 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 222 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 167 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 320 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 42 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 49 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 0100 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 0184 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 227 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 146 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 0268 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 220 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 313 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 15 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 43 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 30 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 1163 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 0162 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 20 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 1105 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 22 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 31 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 35 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 37 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 0108 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 181 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 28 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 279 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 0217 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 36 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 0252 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 141 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 20 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 0228 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 137 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 20 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 31 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 0216 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 149 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 22 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 30 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 0194 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 155 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 219 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 30 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsCreatinine (umol/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 0240 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 120 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 26 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 31 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsBilirubin (umol/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 0147 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 1100 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 219 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 32 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HyponatremiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 0259 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 19 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 20 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 30 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsSodium (mmol/L) - HypernatremiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 0222 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 137 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 20 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 39 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HypokalemiaGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 0213 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 140 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 212 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 33 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsPotassium (mmol/L) - HyperkalemiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 0224 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 142 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 20 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 30 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsUrate (umol/L) - HyperuricemiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 0213 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 124 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 214 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 39 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 43 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsLipase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 0213 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 126 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 212 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 33 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 42 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAmylase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 0201 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 162 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 22 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 31 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 0109 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 183 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 272 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 33 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade ResultsAlbumin (g/L) - HypoalbuminemiaGrade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results

The severity of hematology results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Hematology parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment.

Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 36 months)

Population: Safety Population (all patients who received any dose of study medication) with at least 1 post-baseline result

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 28 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 30 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 0207 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 163 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 0117 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 158 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 266 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 333 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 0118 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 1134 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 216 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 36 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 0236 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 135 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 22 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 31 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 0265 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 18 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 21 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 30 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 40 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 23 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 30 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 0266 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 10 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 411 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 225 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 11 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 342 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 4126 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 20 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 0221 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 0268 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 143 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 31 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 30 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 059 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 139 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) increasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 283 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 23 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 372 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 066 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 027 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 10 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 17 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 1146 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 0257 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 280 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsNeutrophils (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 316 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 27 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsPlatelets (10^9/L) count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsHemoglobin (g/L) - AnemiaGrade 50 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade ResultsLymphocytes (10^9/L) count increasedGrade 30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 38 months)

Population: Safety Population: all patients who received any dose of study medication (i.e., sitravatinib, nivolumab or docetaxel)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationDiscontinuation of Study Drug77 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationDiscontinuation of Nivolumab50 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationDiscontinuation of Sitravatinib74 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationDiscontinuation of Study Drug44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. Serious adverse events (SAE) are defined as any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Death).

Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 38 months)

Population: Safety Population: all patients who received any dose of study medication (i.e., sitravatinib, nivolumab or docetaxel)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation11 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Treatment-Related TEAEs with Outcome of Death1 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation52 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Any TEAE280 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Immune-Related TEAE129 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Grade 3 or Greater TEAEs214 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption184 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs126 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)TEAE with Outcome of Death46 Participants
Nivolumab and SitravatinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption213 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)TEAE with Outcome of Death17 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption110 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation32 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation18 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Immune-Related TEAE0 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption136 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Treatment-Related TEAEs with Outcome of Death3 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Any TEAE272 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Grade 3 or Greater TEAEs216 Participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs101 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment

ORR is defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1 recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. Patients who cannot be assessed for response are counted as non-responders. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease; PR is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 44 months)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population: all patients who are randomized into this study and have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline per central radiographic assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment15.6 Percentage of participants
DocetaxelObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment17.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Censoring was assigned on the date of the last tumor assessment if no assessment of tumor progression is identified and the patient does not die while on study. Patients with no evaluation of disease after first study treatment will have PFS censored on the date of randomization. Patients who start new anti-cancer therapy prior to documented PD will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment prior to the start of the new therapy. Results obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.

Time frame: From randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 44 months)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nivolumab and SitravatinibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment4.40 Months
DocetaxelProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment5.42 Months
Secondary

Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point

Time frame: 0.5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1) and 5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1 and 15), and pre-dose on cycle 1 (day 15), and cycle 2, 3, and 5 (day 1)

Population: Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population - all patients who received treatment with sitravatinib and had sufficient concentration-time data to permit calculation for sitravatinib at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 1 Day 1/ 30 mins Post-Dose2.73201 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.816044
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 1 Day 1/ 5 hours Post-Dose32.41228 ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.358205
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 1 Day 15/ Pre-Dose75.72754 ng/mLStandard Deviation 35.261907
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 1 Day 15/ 5 hours Post-Dose89.71667 ng/mLStandard Deviation 36.289115
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 2 Day 1/ Pre-Dose62.20483 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.055422
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 3 Day 1/ Pre-Dose51.90238 ng/mLStandard Deviation 19.946633
Nivolumab and SitravatinibSitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time PointCycle 5 Day 1/ Pre-Dose50.40513 ng/mLStandard Deviation 24.995304

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026