Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Sitravatinib, Nivolumab, Docetaxel, Checkpoint inhibitor, MGCD516, NSCLC, SAPPHIRE
Brief summary
This study will compare the efficacy of the investigational agent sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who have previously experienced disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Detailed description
Sitravatinib (MGCD516) is an orally-available, small molecule inhibitor of a closely related spectrum of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including MET, TAM (Tyro3, AXL, MERTK) family, VEGFR family, PDGFR family, KIT, FLT3, TRK family, RET, DDR2, and selected EPH family members. Nivolumab is a human IgG monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and selectively blocks the interaction with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby releasing PD-1 pathway mediated inhibition of the immune response, including anti-tumor immune response. RTKs have been implicated in mediating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which has emerged as a potential resistance mechanism to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Inhibition of these RTKs by sitravatinib may augment anti-tumor immune response and improve outcomes by overcoming resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Interventions
Nivolumab is an antibody directed at the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), blocking its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2.
Sitravatinib is a small molecule inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases.
Docetaxel is an anti-neoplastic agent that acts by disrupting the microtubular network in cells.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer * Receipt of at least one but not more than two prior treatment regimens in the advanced setting * Prior treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy in combination or in sequence (i.e., platinum-based chemotheraphy followed by checkpoint inhibitor therapy) * Most recent treatment regimen must have included a checkpoint inhibitor therapy with radiographic disease progression on or after treatment * Candidate to receive docetaxel as second or third line therapy
Exclusion criteria
* Uncontrolled brain metastases * Tumors that have tested positive for EGFR, ROS1, ALK mutations, or ALK fusions * Unacceptable toxicity with prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy * Receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapy post checkpoint inhibitor therapy, other than maintenance chemotherapy * Impaired heart function
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | From randomization date to date of death due to any cause (Up to approximately 44 months) | OS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients who did not die on study are censored at the date of the last on-study follow-up that the patient was known to be alive (including follow-up data). Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 61 months) | An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. Serious adverse events (SAE) are defined as any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Death). |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 61 months) | An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | From first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 59 months) | The severity of hematology results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Hematology parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment. |
| Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | From first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 59 months) | The severity of chemistry results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Chemistry parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | From randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 74 months) | ORR is defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1 recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. Patients who cannot be assessed for response are counted as non-responders. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease; PR is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | From randomization to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD (Up to approximately 74 months) | DOR is defined as the time from date of the first documentation of confirmed objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method. |
| Clinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment | From randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 74 months) | CBR is defined as the percentage of patients documented to have a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or SD, according to RECIST 1.1 as the best response. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Stable Disease (SD) is concluded when the response does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression. Progression is defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | From randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 74 months) | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Censoring was assigned on the date of the last tumor assessment if no assessment of tumor progression is identified and the patient does not die while on study. Patients with no evaluation of disease after first study treatment will have PFS censored on the date of randomization. Patients who start new anti-cancer therapy prior to documented PD will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment prior to the start of the new therapy. Results obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method. |
| 1-Year Survival Rate | At 12 months from first dose | 1-Year Survival will be defined as the percentage of participants surviving at 1 year after the first dose. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Greenwood's formula (1980). |
| Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49. | The LCSS is a lung cancer specific measure of quality of life and includes 9 questions, including patient-reported ratings of six symptoms (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and three summary items (symptom distress, activity level, overall quality of life) using 100-mm visual analogue scales ranging from 0 (lowest rating) to 100 (highest rating) where a higher score represents a worse outcome. The average total score = is a sum of items 1 to 9 divided by the total number of items (sum of items 1 to 9) / 9). |
| Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49. | The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. The EQ-5D-5L health utility index (HUI) is assessed using the Crosswalk algorithm for France based on the individual responses to the 5 EQ-5D-5L domains ranging from -0.530 to 1.000. The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 0.08 points. |
| Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49. | The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is a component of the EQ-5D-5L and assesses the patient's self-rated health using a vertical visual analogue scale where numbered 0 (the worst health you can image) to 100 (the best health you can imageine). The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 7 points. |
| Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | 0.5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1) and 5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1 and 15), and pre-dose on cycle 1 (day 15), and cycle 2, 3, and 5 (day 1) | Sitravatinib plasma concentration by time point. 1 cycle = 28 days. |
Countries
Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib Participants with Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer were administered with Nivolumab by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes at 240 milligram (mg) every 2 weeks or at 480 mg every 4 weeks at the discretion of the investigator . Sitravatinib capsules were administered at 100 mg orally, once daily. | 284 |
| Docetaxel Participants with Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer were administered with Docetaxel by intravenous infusion at 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) over 1 hour every 3 weeks. | 293 |
| Total | 577 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Total | Docetaxel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.48 | 65.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32 | 65.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 12 Participants | 30 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 219 Participants | 426 Participants | 207 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 53 Participants | 121 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 7 participants | 16 participants | 9 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 8 participants | 22 participants | 14 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 14 participants | 32 participants | 18 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Reported | 34 participants | 80 participants | 46 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 4 participants | 7 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 5 participants | 9 participants | 4 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 211 participants | 409 participants | 198 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 114 Participants | 239 Participants | 125 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 170 Participants | 338 Participants | 168 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 202 / 284 | 209 / 293 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 275 / 281 | 267 / 273 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 128 / 281 | 102 / 273 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients who did not die on study are censored at the date of the last on-study follow-up that the patient was known to be alive (including follow-up data). Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.
Time frame: From randomization date to date of death due to any cause (Up to approximately 44 months)
Population: Intent-to-Treat population: all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Overall Survival (OS) | 12.22 Months |
| Docetaxel | Overall Survival (OS) | 10.58 Months |
1-Year Survival Rate
1-Year Survival will be defined as the percentage of participants surviving at 1 year after the first dose. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Greenwood's formula (1980).
Time frame: At 12 months from first dose
Population: Intent-to-Treat Population: All randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | 1-Year Survival Rate | 50.18 Percentage of participants |
| Docetaxel | 1-Year Survival Rate | 44.12 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI)
The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. The EQ-5D-5L health utility index (HUI) is assessed using the Crosswalk algorithm for France based on the individual responses to the 5 EQ-5D-5L domains ranging from -0.530 to 1.000. The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 0.08 points.
Time frame: Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.
Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all randomized participants) with available scores for each assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 1 (Week 9) | -0.09 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 2 (Week 17) | -0.07 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 3 (Week 25) | -0.10 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 4 (Week 33) | -0.09 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 5 (Week 41) | -0.08 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 6 (Week 49) | -0.10 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 5 (Week 41) | -0.12 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 1 (Week 9) | -0.05 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 4 (Week 33) | -0.09 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 2 (Week 17) | -0.10 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 6 (Week 49) | -0.15 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Health Utility Index (HUI) | Assessment 3 (Week 25) | -0.15 Score on a scale |
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is a component of the EQ-5D-5L and assesses the patient's self-rated health using a vertical visual analogue scale where numbered 0 (the worst health you can image) to 100 (the best health you can imageine). The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 7 points.
Time frame: Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.
Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all randomized participants) with available scores for each assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 1 (Week 9) | -4.74 Change in score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 2 (Week 17) | -3.24 Change in score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 3 (Week 25) | -3.37 Change in score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 4 (Week 33) | -3.41 Change in score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 5 (Week 41) | -3.55 Change in score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 6 (Week 49) | -6.05 Change in score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 5 (Week 41) | -2.89 Change in score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 1 (Week 9) | -3.77 Change in score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 4 (Week 33) | -2.71 Change in score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 2 (Week 17) | -5.12 Change in score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 6 (Week 49) | -4.17 Change in score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Score (VAS) | Assessment 3 (Week 25) | -8.72 Change in score on a scale |
Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score
The LCSS is a lung cancer specific measure of quality of life and includes 9 questions, including patient-reported ratings of six symptoms (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and three summary items (symptom distress, activity level, overall quality of life) using 100-mm visual analogue scales ranging from 0 (lowest rating) to 100 (highest rating). The average total score = is a sum of items 1 to 9 divided by the total number of items (sum of items 1 to 9) / 9).
Time frame: Clinic visit closest to the disease evaluation on weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49.
Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all randomized participants) with available scores for each assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 1 (Week 9) | 4.10 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 2 (Week 17) | 2.74 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 3 (Week 25) | 4.58 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 4 (Week 33) | 4.08 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 5 (Week 41) | 6.73 Score on a scale |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 6 (Week 49) | 3.91 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 5 (Week 41) | 5.12 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 1 (Week 9) | 2.75 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 4 (Week 33) | 5.83 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 2 (Week 17) | 5.78 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 6 (Week 49) | 10.85 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Assessment 3 (Week 25) | 7.92 Score on a scale |
Clinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment
CBR is defined as the percentage of patients documented to have a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or SD, according to RECIST 1.1 as the best response. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Stable Disease (SD) is concluded when the response does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression. Progression is defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 44 months)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population: all patients who are randomized into this study and have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Clinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
| Docetaxel | Clinical Benefit Rate Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 64.5 Percentage of participants |
Duration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment
DOR is defined as the time from date of the first documentation of confirmed objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD. Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. Partial response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Results obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.
Time frame: From randomization to the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD (Up to approximately 44 months)
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all patients who are randomized into this study and have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline) with a confirmed objective response (CR or PR) per central radiographic assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Duration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 7.43 Months |
| Docetaxel | Duration of Response (DOR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 7.10 Months |
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results
The severity of chemistry results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Chemistry parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment.
Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 36 months)
Population: Safety Population (all patients who received any dose of study medication) with at least 1 post-baseline result
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 151 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 1 | 17 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 3 | 15 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 0 | 217 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 1 | 34 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 2 | 20 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 106 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 0 | 189 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 1 | 84 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 0 | 147 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 1 | 105 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 0 | 180 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 2 | 11 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 181 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 10 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 41 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 22 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 1 | 67 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 20 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 9 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 100 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 184 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 2 | 27 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 46 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 0 | 268 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 20 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 13 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 163 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 162 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 105 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 0 | 108 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 1 | 81 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 2 | 79 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 0 | 217 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 0 | 252 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 1 | 41 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 228 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 37 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 216 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 49 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 0 | 194 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 1 | 55 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 2 | 19 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Creatinine (umol/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 0 | 240 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 1 | 20 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Bilirubin (umol/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 0 | 147 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 1 | 100 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 2 | 19 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hyponatremia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 0 | 259 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Sodium (mmol/L) - Hypernatremia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 0 | 222 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 1 | 37 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hypokalemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 0 | 213 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 1 | 40 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 2 | 12 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Potassium (mmol/L) - Hyperkalemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 0 | 224 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 1 | 42 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Urate (umol/L) - Hyperuricemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 213 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 24 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 14 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Lipase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 213 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 26 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 12 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Amylase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 0 | 201 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 1 | 62 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 0 | 109 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 1 | 83 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 2 | 72 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Chemistry Grade Results | Albumin (g/L) - Hypoalbuminemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results
The severity of hematology results were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 5.0); Hematology parameters were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with maximum post baseline grades is presented. Grade 0 is defined as absence of an AE or within normal limits. Baseline is defined as the last pre-dose assessment.
Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose (Up to an average of 7.5 months and maximum of 36 months)
Population: Safety Population (all patients who received any dose of study medication) with at least 1 post-baseline result
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 0 | 207 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 1 | 63 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 0 | 117 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 1 | 58 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 2 | 66 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 3 | 33 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 0 | 118 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 1 | 134 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 2 | 16 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 0 | 236 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 1 | 35 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 0 | 265 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 0 | 266 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 4 | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 2 | 25 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 3 | 42 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 4 | 126 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 0 | 221 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 0 | 268 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 1 | 43 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 0 | 59 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 1 | 39 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) increased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 2 | 83 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 3 | 72 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 0 | 66 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 0 | 27 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 1 | 146 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 0 | 257 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 2 | 80 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Neutrophils (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 3 | 16 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Platelets (10^9/L) count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Hemoglobin (g/L) - Anemia | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Hematology Grade Results | Lymphocytes (10^9/L) count increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment.
Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 38 months)
Population: Safety Population: all patients who received any dose of study medication (i.e., sitravatinib, nivolumab or docetaxel)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | Discontinuation of Study Drug | 77 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | Discontinuation of Nivolumab | 50 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | Discontinuation of Sitravatinib | 74 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | Discontinuation of Study Drug | 44 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any reaction, side effect or other undesirable medical event that occurs during participation in a clinical trial, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to study treatment. Serious adverse events (SAE) are defined as any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) is an AE that occurs after the first dose of any study treatment or any preexisting condition that increases in severity after the first dose of study treatment. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Death).
Time frame: From first dose up to 28 days post last dose, and up to 100 days post last dose of nivolumab for immune-related AEs (Up to maximum of 38 months)
Population: Safety Population: all patients who received any dose of study medication (i.e., sitravatinib, nivolumab or docetaxel)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation | 11 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Treatment-Related TEAEs with Outcome of Death | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | 52 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 280 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Immune-Related TEAE | 129 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Grade 3 or Greater TEAEs | 214 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption | 184 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Serious TEAEs | 126 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | TEAE with Outcome of Death | 46 Participants |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption | 213 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | TEAE with Outcome of Death | 17 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption | 110 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Treatment-Related TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation | 32 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation | 18 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Immune-Related TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Interruption | 136 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Treatment-Related TEAEs with Outcome of Death | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 272 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Grade 3 or Greater TEAEs | 216 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) | Serious TEAEs | 101 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment
ORR is defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1 recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. Patients who cannot be assessed for response are counted as non-responders. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease; PR is defined as \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to approximately 44 months)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population: all patients who are randomized into this study and have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline per central radiographic assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 15.6 Percentage of participants |
| Docetaxel | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 17.2 Percentage of participants |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions. Censoring was assigned on the date of the last tumor assessment if no assessment of tumor progression is identified and the patient does not die while on study. Patients with no evaluation of disease after first study treatment will have PFS censored on the date of randomization. Patients who start new anti-cancer therapy prior to documented PD will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment prior to the start of the new therapy. Results obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimation, Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) method.
Time frame: From randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 44 months)
Population: Intent-to-Treat population: all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 4.40 Months |
| Docetaxel | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiographic Assessment | 5.42 Months |
Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point
Time frame: 0.5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1) and 5 hours post dose on cycle 1 (day 1 and 15), and pre-dose on cycle 1 (day 15), and cycle 2, 3, and 5 (day 1)
Population: Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population - all patients who received treatment with sitravatinib and had sufficient concentration-time data to permit calculation for sitravatinib at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 1 Day 1/ 30 mins Post-Dose | 2.73201 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 4.816044 |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 1 Day 1/ 5 hours Post-Dose | 32.41228 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 21.358205 |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 1 Day 15/ Pre-Dose | 75.72754 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 35.261907 |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 1 Day 15/ 5 hours Post-Dose | 89.71667 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 36.289115 |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 2 Day 1/ Pre-Dose | 62.20483 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 27.055422 |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 3 Day 1/ Pre-Dose | 51.90238 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 19.946633 |
| Nivolumab and Sitravatinib | Sitravatinib Plasma Concentration by Time Point | Cycle 5 Day 1/ Pre-Dose | 50.40513 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 24.995304 |