Skip to content

A Study to Compare the Efficacy of SEL-212 to KRYSTEXXA® in Gout Participants Refractory to Conventional Therapy

A Study to Compare the Efficacy of SEL-212 to KRYSTEXXA® in Gout Patients Refractory to Conventional Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03905512
Acronym
COMPARE
Enrollment
170
Registered
2019-04-05
Start date
2019-05-07
Completion date
2020-08-05
Last updated
2023-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Gout

Brief summary

This is a randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter study to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of SEL-212 and KRYSTEXXA®. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive treatment with SEL-212 or KRYSTEXXA® for 6 months. Efficacy assessments, as measured by serum uric acid (SUA) levels, will be conducted at intervals that are appropriate to determine treatment effect differences. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter study to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of SEL-212 and KRYSTEXXA®. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive treatment with SEL-212 \[a combination of pegadricase (SEL-037) and ImmTOR (SEL-110)\] or KRYSTEXXA® for 6 months. Study participants in the SEL-212 arm will receive study drug every 28 days for a total of up to 6 infusions of SEL-212. Study participants in the KRYSTEXXA® arm will receive study drug according to the manufacturer's prescribing information, i.e., every 14 days for a total of up to 12 infusions of KRYSTEXXA®. Efficacy assessments, as measured by SUA levels, will be conducted at intervals that are appropriate to determine treatment effect differences. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

Administered as specified in the treatment arm

DRUGKRYSTEXXA®

Administered as specified in the treatment arm

Sponsors

Selecta Biosciences, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Assessments of qualitative endpoints will be conducted on an assessor-blinded basis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. History of symptomatic gout defined as: 1. ≥ 3 gout flares within 18 months of Screening or 2. Presence of ≥ 1 tophus or 3. Current diagnosis of gouty arthritis 2. At the Screening Visit: male age 21 - 80 years, inclusive, or female of non-childbearing potential age 21-80 years, inclusive, where non-childbearing potential is defined as: 1. \> 6 weeks after hysterectomy with or without surgical bilateral salpingooperhectony or 2. Post-menopausal (\> 24 months of natural amenorrhea) 3. Has at the Screening Visit SUA ≥ 7 mg/dL, with chronic refractory gout defined as having failed to normalize SUA and whose signs and symptoms are inadequately controlled with xanthine oxidase inhibitors at the medically appropriate dose or for whom these drugs are contraindicated; 4. Willing to provide written informed consent prior to the conduct of any study specific procedures; 5. Understands and is willing and able to comply with study requirements, including the schedule of follow-up visits Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior exposure to any experimental or marketed uricase (e.g., pegloticase \[Krystexxa®\], pegadricase \[SEL-037\], rasburicase \[Elitek, Fasturtec\]); 2. History of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions to medications; 3. History of any allergy to pegylated products 4. Drugs known to interact with Rapamune cannot be used during the trial; 5. Uncontrolled diabetes; 6. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency; 7. Uncontrolled hypertension; 8. Participants whose arrhythmia is unstable on current treatment; 9. History of coronary artery disease, including myocardial infarction or unstable angina, within the last 6 months; 10. Congestive heart failure; 11. History of hematological disorders within 1 year or autoimmune disorders, is immunosuppressed or immunocompromised; 12. Has received an inactivated vaccine in the previous 3 months or has received a live virus vaccine in the previous 6 months; 13. Is planning to receive any vaccination or live virus vaccination during the study;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serum Uric Acid (SUA) Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the TimeUp to Month 6The average of the data collected during Month 3 and Month 6 was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for 100% of the Time During Month 6Month 6
Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleBaseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6Eight categories were assessed by the HAQ-DI: 1) dressing and grooming, 2) arising, 3) eating, 4) walking, 5) hygiene, 6) reaching, 7) gripping, and 8) common daily activities. There were 2 or 3 questions for each category. Scoring within each category was on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The score given to each section was the worst (highest) score within the section. The HAQ-DI total score was calculated if 6 or more sections were available. The average of the 8 category scores was reported as the HAQ-DI total score on a scale of 0 to 3. Reduction from baseline, and lower scores indicated better QoL.
QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleBaseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6The PrGA was administered to assess the severity of the participant's disease on a scale from 0 (participant feels very well) to 100 (participant feels very poor). Reduction from baseline, and lower scores indicated less severe disease.
QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleBaseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire to assesses a participant's health status using 8 health concepts: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. The mental component reports the average of all the emotionally relevant items and the physical component reports the average of all the physical relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 indicates no disability. Median change can range from -100 to 100. A positive median change indicated an improved outcome.
Number of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for At Least 80% of the Time During Month 6Month 6
Number of Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 1 to Month 3, Month 4 to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Number of Tender JointsBaseline to End of Month 6
Change From Baseline in Number of Swollen JointsBaseline to End of Month 6
Number of Participants With Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 1 to Month 3, Month 4 to Month 6

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled across clinical sites in the United States.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SEL-212
Participants received SEL-212 via IV infusion every 28 days for up to 6 months
83
KRYSTEXXA
Participants received KRYSTEXXA® according to the manufacturer's prescribing information every 14 days for up to 6 months
87
Total170

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up43
Overall StudyOther than Specified74
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject98

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicKRYSTEXXATotalSEL-212
Age, Continuous52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants36 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants134 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants131 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants163 Participants78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 830 / 87
other
Total, other adverse events
60 / 8353 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 838 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Serum Uric Acid (SUA) Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time

The average of the data collected during Month 3 and Month 6 was reported.

Time frame: Up to Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SEL-212Number of Participants With Serum Uric Acid (SUA) Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time44 Participants
KRYSTEXXANumber of Participants With Serum Uric Acid (SUA) Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for at Least 80% of the Time40 Participants
p-value: 0.181Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Swollen Joints

Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212Change From Baseline in Number of Swollen JointsBaseline3.0 number of swollen jointsStandard Deviation 5.39
SEL-212Change From Baseline in Number of Swollen JointsChange at End of Month 6-1.6 number of swollen jointsStandard Deviation 5.51
KRYSTEXXAChange From Baseline in Number of Swollen JointsBaseline3.7 number of swollen jointsStandard Deviation 6.64
KRYSTEXXAChange From Baseline in Number of Swollen JointsChange at End of Month 6-1.9 number of swollen jointsStandard Deviation 8.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Tender Joints

Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212Change From Baseline in Number of Tender JointsBaseline5.2 number of tender jointsStandard Deviation 8.81
SEL-212Change From Baseline in Number of Tender JointsChange at End of Month 6-2.4 number of tender jointsStandard Deviation 8.98
KRYSTEXXAChange From Baseline in Number of Tender JointsBaseline4.1 number of tender jointsStandard Deviation 7.49
KRYSTEXXAChange From Baseline in Number of Tender JointsChange at End of Month 6-2.7 number of tender jointsStandard Deviation 6.93
Secondary

Number of Gout Flares Per 3-Month Period

Time frame: Month 1 to Month 3, Month 4 to Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212Number of Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 1 to Month 31.1 number of flaresStandard Deviation 1.16
SEL-212Number of Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMont 4 to Month 60.2 number of flaresStandard Deviation 0.56
KRYSTEXXANumber of Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 1 to Month 30.8 number of flaresStandard Deviation 1.24
KRYSTEXXANumber of Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMont 4 to Month 60.3 number of flaresStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Number of Participants With Gout Flares Per 3-Month Period

Time frame: Month 1 to Month 3, Month 4 to Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SEL-212Number of Participants With Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 1 to Month 350 Participants
SEL-212Number of Participants With Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 4 to Month 616 Participants
KRYSTEXXANumber of Participants With Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 1 to Month 342 Participants
KRYSTEXXANumber of Participants With Gout Flares Per 3-Month PeriodMonth 4 to Month 615 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for 100% of the Time During Month 6

Time frame: Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SEL-212Number of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for 100% of the Time During Month 638 Participants
KRYSTEXXANumber of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for 100% of the Time During Month 636 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for At Least 80% of the Time During Month 6

Time frame: Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SEL-212Number of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for At Least 80% of the Time During Month 645 Participants
KRYSTEXXANumber of Participants With SUA Reduction of < 6 mg/dL for At Least 80% of the Time During Month 641 Participants
Secondary

QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) Scale

The PrGA was administered to assess the severity of the participant's disease on a scale from 0 (participant feels very well) to 100 (participant feels very poor). Reduction from baseline, and lower scores indicated less severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleBaseline42.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.65
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleChange at End of Month 3-20.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.38
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleChange at End of Month 6-24.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.87
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleBaseline40.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.62
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleChange at End of Month 3-15.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.97
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Provider Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PrGA) ScaleChange at End of Month 6-22.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.37
Secondary

QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Scale

The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire to assesses a participant's health status using 8 health concepts: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. The mental component reports the average of all the emotionally relevant items and the physical component reports the average of all the physical relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 indicates no disability. Median change can range from -100 to 100. A positive median change indicated an improved outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScalePhysical Component Scores at Baseline43.822 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9976
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Physical Component Scores at End of Month 33.323 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9242
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Physical Component Scores at End of Month 65.881 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.0453
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleMental Component Scores at Baseline51.977 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4731
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Mental Component Scores at End of Month 30.381 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7469
SEL-212QoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Mental Component Scores at End of Month 61.516 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4824
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Mental Component Scores at End of Month 31.229 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6445
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScalePhysical Component Scores at Baseline43.345 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2714
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleMental Component Scores at Baseline53.386 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3171
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Physical Component Scores at End of Month 35.768 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.0712
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Mental Component Scores at End of Month 6-0.322 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.0626
KRYSTEXXAQoL as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) ScaleChange in Physical Component Scores at End of Month 67.448 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3909
Secondary

Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scale

Eight categories were assessed by the HAQ-DI: 1) dressing and grooming, 2) arising, 3) eating, 4) walking, 5) hygiene, 6) reaching, 7) gripping, and 8) common daily activities. There were 2 or 3 questions for each category. Scoring within each category was on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The score given to each section was the worst (highest) score within the section. The HAQ-DI total score was calculated if 6 or more sections were available. The average of the 8 category scores was reported as the HAQ-DI total score on a scale of 0 to 3. Reduction from baseline, and lower scores indicated better QoL.

Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6

Population: ITT set included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SEL-212Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleBaseline0.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.774
SEL-212Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleChange at End of Month 3-0.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.725
SEL-212Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleChange at End of Month 60.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.723
KRYSTEXXAQuality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleBaseline0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.834
KRYSTEXXAQuality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleChange at End of Month 3-0.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.795
KRYSTEXXAQuality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScaleChange at End of Month 6-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.739

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026