Skip to content

Efficacy of Pregabalin Versus Combined Pregabalin and Milnacipran in Fibromyalgia.

The Efficacy of Pregabalin as a Monotherapy Versus Combined Pregabalin and Milnacipran in the Management of Fibromyalgia.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03905486
Enrollment
58
Registered
2019-04-05
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia, Primary

Brief summary

Diagnosis of fibromyalgia is complex and treatment options are limited. Pharmacological management of fibromyalgia is mainly centered on the central nervous system. In particular there is robust evidence for the use of tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline), anti-convulsants such as gabapentin or pregabalin and agents from the serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) family such as milnacipran. Aim of the work: To compare the efficacy of pregabalin agent (averopreg) alone versus combined pregabalin and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (milnacipran) in the management of fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

Subjects: The study will include 50 patients diagnosed as having fibromyalgia according to the ACR 2010 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Methods: Patients will be classified into two groups: 1\) Group 1: Patients will receive pregabalin as a monotherapy and the doses will be administered according to the treatment recommendations for fibromyalgia in the package insert, starting by 50mg twice daily increasing to 100 mg twice daily within 1 week based on efficacy and tolerability. 7\) Group 2: Patients will receive combined pregabalin and milnacipran and the doses will be administered according to the treatment recommendations for fibromyalgia in the package insert, starting by 50mg twice daily increasing to 100 mg twice daily within 1 week for the pregabalin and starting by 12.5 mg increasing gradually to reach 100 mg daily of milnacipran based on efficacy and tolerability.

Interventions

Group 1: will receive pregabalin as a monotherapy. Pregabalin will be administered according to the treatment recommendations for fibromyalgia in the package insert \[Pfizer Inc., 2012\] starting by 50 mg twice daily increasing to 300 mg twice daily according to the efficacy and tolerability for 3 months.

DRUGCombined pregabalin 300mg and milancipran 100mg

Group 2: will receive a combined pregabalin and milancipran. Pregabalin will be administered as group 1, while milancipran will be administered according to the treatment recommendations for fibromyalgia, starting by 50 mg once daily for 1 week then increased to reach 100 mg daily (50 mg twice daily) based on efficacy and tolerability for 3 month.

Sponsors

Yousra Hisham Abdel Fattah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* female patients * diagnosed as fibromyalgia according to the 2016 revision to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with major medical disorders or uncontrolled medical conditions * Patients with recent myocardial infarction or stroke, * Patients with active liver disease, * Patients with renal impairment (creatinine clearance \< 60 ml/min), * Patients with documented autoimmune disease, * Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, * Patients with unstable diabetes, * pregnancy or breastfeeding patients * Patients with exposed to any investigational drug within the past 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain3 monthsassesses the overall pain of fibromyalgia on a 100 mm pain scale with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating the worst pain ever
fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ)3 monthsassesses the overall functional ability and the impact of fibromyalgia on the patients life, with a range from 0-100, 0 indicating no functional impairment or effect of the disease on the patients life and 100 indicating a very bad and tremendous effect of fibromyalgia on the patients life

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire3 monthsThe four aspects of sleep around which the questionnaire is devised (Getting to sleep, GTS; Quality of sleep, QOS; Awakening from sleep, AFS; Behaviour following wakefulness, BFW), and assessing the effect of medication on the quality of sleep each question is a 100 mm line that the patient marks, 0 meaning very bad effect or worsening in sleep pattern, 50 meaning no improvement what so ever with no deterioration and 100 meaning excellent improvement in the sleep pattern

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026