Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® in Cervical Dystonia

A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center, Phase III, Double-Blind, Activi Controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaliate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® Comparison With BOTOX® in Treatment of Cervical Dystonia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03905304
Acronym
CD Phase III
Enrollment
152
Registered
2019-04-05
Start date
2013-01-09
Completion date
2014-08-05
Last updated
2019-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Dystonia

Keywords

CD phase III

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the efficacy and safety of Meditoxin® are not inferior to Botox®'s in the treatment of Cervical Dystonia.

Detailed description

The allocated subject is injected Investigational Product(Meditoxin® or Botox®) 200\ 300U in cervical muscles. The efficacy and safety are evaluated for 12weeks through 4 follow up visits.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMedytoxin

Intramuscular injection up to 300U.

BIOLOGICALBotox

Intramuscular injection up to 300U.

Sponsors

Medy-Tox
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women aged between 20 and 75. * Patient who is diagnosed with primary cervical dystonia over 1 year. * Patients whose total score is over 20 in TWSTRS and the severity score is over 10 in TWSTRS. * For patients with prior treatments of Botox®, over 12 weeks have passed. * Patients who voluntarily sign the informed consent * Patients who can comply with the study procedures and visit schedule

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who has been diagnosed with pure anterocollis. * Patient who has been diagnosed with neuromuscular disorder(myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.)\\ * Severe respiratory function disorder or dysphasia * Allergy in Investigational Product. * Pregnant women, breast feeding women and patients disagreeing to use an acceptable contraception method * Investigator's decision.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in TWSTRS score1 monthChange in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score after 1 month of administration. The scale consists scores from 0 to 35 which corresponds to disorder severity, 35 being the most severe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Analysis of Investigational Product: Number of adverse events occuring during the clinical trial1, 2, 3 monthsNumber of adverse events occuring during the clinical trial.
Change in TWSTRS score1, 2, 3 monthsChange in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) score after 1, 2, and 3 month of administration. The scale consists scores from 0 to 35 which corresponds to disorder severity, 35 being the most severe.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026