Cardiac Surgery
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare cost effectiveness of a polyurethane dressing or a vacuum therapy dressing versus the conventional gauze in the prevention of superficial wound infection y major cardiac surgery
Detailed description
It is a clinical prospective and randomized study. patientes will be randomized to three groups on the day of surgery: conventional gauze, polyurethane or vacuum therapy dressing. Clinical al microbiological data will be monitorized to evaluate the infection rate of surgical wound , mediastinitis, days of hospital stay and consumption of antimicrobials.
Interventions
assignation to three different authorised and on label dressing: conventional dressing (MEPORE)
assignation to three different authorised and on label dressing: absorbent(MEPILEX)
assignation to three different authorised and on label dressing:vacuum Therapy dressing(PICCO)
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
randomized in three groups
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patient scheduled to cardiac surgery. * signed informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
* hypersensibility to dressings
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| prevention of surgical wound infection | surgery date up to 6 months | surgical wound infection measured as number of patients suffering surgical wound infection during the study period |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| hospital stay | from hospitalization until an average of 1 year | days at hospital |
| antimicrobial consumption | from surgery date until an average of 1 year | defined dose of antimicrobial agents during hospital stay |
| dressing consumption cost | from surgery date until an average of 8 weeks | number of dressing and its cost |