Skip to content

Total Contact Insole for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain (LBP)

Effectiveness of Total Contact Insole in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03904940
Acronym
(LBP)
Enrollment
84
Registered
2019-04-05
Start date
2019-07-06
Completion date
2023-12-06
Last updated
2024-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Keywords

Orthotic Devices, Insoles, Quality of life, Function

Brief summary

Non-specific low back pain is a common condition. Insoles are one of the many treatment form for chronic nonspecific LBP. The investigators hypothesized the contact total insole group will present pain reduction and functional improvement. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of contact total insole for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain and the impact of this insole on function, quality of life, load distribution in the plantar region, gait variables and satisfaction with insole use.

Detailed description

A randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial with intent-to-treat analysis. Eighty-four patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain will be randomly into a study group and control group. One week following the baseline evaluation, the study group will receive a contact total insole made of ethyl vinyl acetate and the control group will receive a flat insole made of the same material, color and density. The groups will be evaluated after 6, 12 and 24 weeks of insole use. The following assessment parameters will be employed: low back pain numerical pain scale; functional capacity (Oswestry and roland morris questionnaire, six minute walk test and timed to up and go test); quality of life (Short Form-36) and foot pressure analysis using the AMCube FootWalk Pro program.

Interventions

Ethyl vinyl acetate insole shaped in the cast of the patient's foot.

DEVICEEthyl vinyl acetate flat insole

Flat insole made of the same material ethyl vinyl acetate

Sponsors

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Federal University of São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Low back pain for more than 3 months, with numeric pain scale between 3 - 8 cm; * Over 18 years; * No distinction of sex; * Understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires; * Agree to participate of the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Inflammatory/rheumatological diseases, tumor, infection or vertebral fracture; * Litigation; * Fibromyalgia; * Other symptomatic musculoskeletal diseases in lower limbs; * Symptomatic diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system; * Diabetes Mellitus; * Rigid deformities on foot; * Use of insoles in the last three months; * Medical or physiotherapeutic treatment for low back pain or any problem in lower limbs in the last three months; * People who had changed physical activity or undergone physical therapy in the previous 3 months; * Pregnancy; * Difference of lower limbs greater than 2 cm * Less than 6 months after lumbar spine, lower limb or abdomen surgery * Previous spinal surgery; * Previous spinal infiltration for pain relief in the last 3 months; * Serious scoliosis; * Allergy to the material of the insole. * Planned travel in the next 12 weeks; * Geographic inaccessibility.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low back of pain intensity measured with Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline, 45, 90 and 180 daysIt will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale 10 cm. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last week. Change in pain score or an improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional capacity measured with Roland Morris DisabilityBaseline, 45, 90 and 180 daysChange in Roland Morris Disability score. Ranging from 0 to 24 with higher values represent a worse outcome
Functional capacity measured with the 6-minute walk testBaseline, 45, 90 and 180 daysChange in 6-minute walk test. The amount of meters walked in 6 minutes.
Functional capacity measured with the timed to up and go testBaseline, 45, 90 and 180 daysChange in timed to up and go test. Amount of time that the patient takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Functional capacity measured with Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline, 45, 90 and 180 daysChange in Oswestry Disability Index score. Ranging from 0 to 100 with higher values represent a worse outcome
Patient's global impression of recovery measured with a likert scale45, 90 and 180 days after baselineThe Likert scale. The patients answered the question 'After starting the use the insoles, how do you think your low back is?' with one of the following statements: much worse, a little worse, unchanged, a little better, much better.
Amount Medication consumption45, 90 and 180 days after baselineAmount of paracetamol (500mg) consumed by patient between the evaluation times
Foot pressure analysis using the AMCube FootWalk Pro programbaseline, 90 and 180 days after baseline
Quality of life measured with Short form-36 questionnaireBaseline, 45, 90 and 180 daysChange in Short form-36 questionnaire score. Ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores showing a better outcome.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026