Skip to content

Electronic Patient-reported Outcomes (e-PROs) in Early Intervention

Colorado Early Intervention Outcomes Research Using Innovative Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03904797
Enrollment
149
Registered
2019-04-05
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2019-02-01
Last updated
2019-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Developmental Disability, Development Delay

Keywords

patient-reported outcome, electronic, participation, early intervention

Brief summary

A major goal of early intervention (EI) is to employ a family-centered approach to helping children to optimally function at home and in the community. However, the effects of EI are poorly understood. The aims of this project are: 1) to test the feasibility, acceptability, and value of introducing novel electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) measures in EI, to strengthen family-centered EI care; and 2) to obtain and pair these outcomes data with EI program data, to further determine the value of e-PRO data collection for examining links between EI service use and functional outcomes among families who are enrolled in a large, urban EI program.

Detailed description

Approximately 5,800 infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities (e.g., cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, complex chronic conditions) and delays access Early Intervention Colorado (EI-CO) annually. A primary goal of EI-CO is to employ a family-centered care approach to help children optimally function at home and in the community. Hence, early intervention is a common source of rehabilitation (i.e., physical, occupational, speech and language therapy) for EI-CO eligible families. However, the effects of EI-CO are poorly understood. Numerous challenges exist with obtaining EI-CO outcomes data, including a paucity of validated and feasible functional outcome measures for use in EI outcomes reporting. These challenges have resulted in inadequate knowledge about EI service use and outcomes to guide service delivery. Despite these challenges, recent policy changes have resulted in EI-CO service providers being pressed to ensure high quality care with limited resources and evidence to guide their clinical decision-making about effective and efficient interventions. This proposal addresses the need to fill critical knowledge gaps about the adequacy of EI services with an eye toward improving care quality. This study involves families who have/are receiving EI-CO services through Rocky Mountain Human Services (RMHS), the largest EI program in Denver Metro. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and value of collecting electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO) data to engage families when their child is due for an annual evaluation of progress. To further demonstrate the value of e-PRO data collection, these data will be paired with program data to estimate the association between EI-CO service use and functional outcomes.

Interventions

Participants were primary caregivers (n=149) recruited from a large, urban early intervention program. All caregivers were approached by early intervention staff the month prior to the child's annual evaluation of progress. Each caregiver confirmed his or her eligibility online by verifying that they were at least 18 years old; could read, write, and speak English or Spanish; had internet access; and had a child between 0-3 years old who had received early intervention for at least 3 months. Participants enrolled online and provided consent, signed a HIPAA authorization for service record release, and then proceeded to completing a demographic questionnaire and YC-PEM e-PRO to receive an online report of their responses to share with their child's EI team.

Sponsors

Rocky Mountain Human Services
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Illinois at Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 36 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Caregiver is at least 18 years old; * Caregiver can read, write, and speak English or Spanish; * Caregiver had internet access; * Caregiver has a child between 0-3 years old who had received early intervention at RMHS for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Caregiver is less than 18 years old * Caregiver reads, speaks, and writes in a language other than English or Spanish * Caregiver does not have internet access * Caregiver has a child who has received EI services for less than 3 months * Caregiver has a child older than 3 years (36 months)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
YC-PEM e-PRO Feasibility as assessed by enrollment rateup to 4 weeksEnrollment rate was estimated as the proportion of eligible participants who enrolled in the study. The success of feasibility was determined as e-PRO enrollment rates of 50% or higher based on what is known about the percentage of families who opt into family assessment as part of usual care.
YC-PEM e-PRO Acceptability as assessed by caregiver perceptions of overall helpfulnessup to 4 weeksCaregiver responses to an open-ended item were coded into a one of three categories (yes, helpful; somewhat helpful; not helpful) to create a new variable that captured the extent to which caregivers perceived the YC-PEM e-PRO to be useful for planning EI care.
YC-PEM e-PRO Value as assessed by proportion of participants viewing e-PRO online reportup to 4 weeksThe percentage of participants who viewed a summary of their e-PRO responses via an online report was estimated.
YC-PEM e-PRO Feasibility as assessed by completion rateup to 4 weeksFeasibility was determined as the proportion of participants who enrolled that completed the YC-PEM e-PRO. The success of feasibility was determined as completion rates of 50% or higher based on family assessment completion rates within usual care.
YC-PEM e-PRO Feasibility as assessed by completion time in minutes and secondsup to 4 weeksThe success of feasibility was determined as e-PRO completion time of less than 45 minutes based on family assessment completion time within usual care.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026