Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of XEN® Gel Stent and Post-operative Management in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma

Efficacy and Safety of XEN® Gel Stent and Post-operative Management in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Compared to Classic Glaucoma Surgeries (Trabeculectomy and Sclerectomy) as Well as Other Minilally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03904381
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-04-05
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2022-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Open-angle Glaucoma

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative management with 5-fluorouracil injections after XEN Gel Stent implantation.

Interventions

DRUG5-fluorouracil

5-fluorouracil subconjunctival injections were a first-choice therapy for bleb failure and were administered according to predetermined criteria.

PROCEDURETransconjunctival needling

Transconjunctival needling was administered according to predetermined criteria.

PROCEDURETransconjunctival revision

Transconjunctival revision was administered according to predetermined criteria.

Sponsors

Wrocław University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Wroclaw Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma * trabecular meshwork visible in gonioscopy * medicated IOP of ≥ 15 mmHg and ≤ 35 mmHg * taking 1 to 5 IOP-lowering medications * area of healthy, free and mobile conjunctiva in the target quadrant (superior-nasal) * signed inform consent

Exclusion criteria

* angle closure glaucoma * secondary open angle glaucoma * previous glaucoma shunt/valve in the target quadrant * presence of conjunctival scarring, prior conjunctival surgery or other conjunctival pathologies (e.g., pterygium) in the target quadrant * active inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis) * active iris neovascularization or neovascularization of the iris within 6 months of the surgical date * anterior chamber intraocular lens * presence of intraocular silicone oil * vitreous present in the anterior chamber * impaired episcleral venous drainage (e.g., Sturge-Weber or nanophthalmos or other evidence of elevated venous pressure) * known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to drugs required for the surgical procedure or any of the device components (e.g., porcine products or glutaraldehyde) * history of dermatologic keloid formation * previous photorefractive keratectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unqualified success5 yearsUnqualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP \<18 mmHg and \>20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved without use of any antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualified success score A5 yearsQualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP \<21 mmHg and \>20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.
Qualified success score B5 yearsQualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP \< 18 mmHg and \>20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.
Qualified success score C5 yearsQualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP ≤15 mmHg and \>40% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Refractive error5 yearsChange in refractive error after glaucoma procedures
Best-corrected visual acuity5 yearsEvaluated on the fixed charts by trained optometrist
Glaucoma Progression5 yearsGlaucoma progression was evaluated with the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson Glaucoma Grading Scale (GGS). Staging according to the standards given in bibliography (Budenz et all in 2002)
Disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS)5 yearsEvaluation disc damage likelihood scale based on the fundus photographs
Peripapillar and macular vessels density5 yearsMeasured on the custom-derived protocol and manufacturer software macular and peripapillar vessels density - Angio OCT (OCTA)
Visual field (VF)5 yearsDetection of the visual field abnormalities on the standard machine and during screening procedures
Change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)5 yearsDifference in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer during the observation time frame.
Change in thickness of ganglion cell complex (GCC)5 yearsDifference in thickness of ganglion cell complex during the observation time frame.
Short term changes in IOP after surgery5 yearsEvaluated with the use of water drinking test.

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026