Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Cleverscope. A New Medical Device for Tracheal Intubation

Safety and Efficacy Assessment of a New Tracheal Intubation Device Cleverscope. Success Rate of Cleverscope in Patients With Suspected Difficult Airway.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03902704
Enrollment
134
Registered
2019-04-04
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2022-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia Intubation Complication, Difficult Intubation

Keywords

videolaryngoscopy, tracheal intubation

Brief summary

Cleverscope is a new medical device that transform a laryngoscope into a videolaryngoscope. previous its commercialization we evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Detailed description

the investigators develope two part study. part I: the investigators collect data of 50 patients prospectively programed for general anesthesia and tracheal intubation without predictors of difficult airways. this patients were intubated with cleverscope, the investigators register best cormack-lehane (glottic vision) obtained with Cleverscope and best cormack obtained with direct laryngoscopy. the investigators register intubation succes rate and any complications during its use and after extubation. part II: after confirm safety and efficacy in patients without difficult airways (part I) the investigators use Cleverscope for the same pourpose on difficult airways patients. collecting same data . the investigators compare cormack-lehane in this patients with Cleverscope and commercial Videolaryngoscope C-MAC.

Interventions

DEVICECleverscope

the device is used in patients without difficult airways predictors

DEVICELaryngoscope / Videolaryngoscope C-MAC® Storz

the device is used in patients with difficult airways predictors

Sponsors

FIPSE
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

part 1 its single group of participants(50 patients without difficult airways predictors). this group receives direct laringoscopy with common laryngoscope (L) during the initial phase of the trial, followed by videolaryngoscope (VL) Cleverscope (used for intubation) during a later phase. part 2 of the study its two-by-two cross-over assignment involves two groups of participants(84 patients with difficult airways predictors). One group receives VL with C-MAC during the initial phase of the trial, followed by Cleverscope for intubation during a later phase. The other group receives VL with Cleverscope during the initial phase, followed by C-MAC VL used for intubation. So during the part 2 trial, participants cross over to the other videolaringoscopy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* part 1: Scheduled Patients for any kind of surgery with general anesthesia with tracheal intubation without predictors of difficult intubation : 1. Arne Test \< 10 2. cervical circunference / tyromental distance \< 4. * part 2: Scheduled Patients for any kind of surgery with general anesthesia with tracheal intubation with predictors of difficult intubation : 1. Arne Test \> 10 2. cervical circunference / tyromental distance \> 4.

Exclusion criteria

* no mouth openning \>2cm * required use of awake fiberscope por tracheal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cormack-Lehane Glotic visualization scale (I(complete view, easy to intubate)-IV(no view, imposible to intubate)intraoperativedegree of glotis visualization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall success intubation rate with same deviceintraoperativeit could include more attempts
time to successintraoperativetime wasted from device inserted into mouth to inflate tracheal tube
complications rateintraoperativeregister complications during intubation or due device usage. like hemorrage, mucosal laceration,
First attempt intubation success rateintraoperativethe rate of traqueal tube pass through vocal cords at first attemps.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactLucas Rovira, PhD
lucasrovira@gmail.com+34659276476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026