Skip to content

Treatment of Osteoporosis - TOP1 Clinical Study

Treatment of Osteoporosis by Panaceo: Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Study Assessed Effect on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover of Panaceo Compared to Placebo in Osteoporotic Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03901989
Acronym
TOP1
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-04-03
Start date
2015-01-14
Completion date
2017-03-20
Last updated
2019-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Brief summary

This study investigates the effect of zeolite on bone mineral metabolism. The clinical parameters include bone mineral density, bone remodelling markers, fractures and fallings, the subjective evaluation of the overall health status and intensity of the musculoskeletal pain measured by VAS.

Detailed description

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. The Study lasts 12 months. Study Population: The study population will consist of 100 patients with osteoporosis defined according BMD (bone mineral density) criteria: T score -2, 5 on the femoral neck, and, or T -2, 5 on L1-L5, who has not been treated before, or in whom privies treatment did not been successful, despite a gender or age. Subjects will be randomized in each cohort to receive PMA-zeolite (Panaceo) or placebo (1:1). All of them will receive Vit D3 800 j daily. The double blind design can be reached by a third party blinding where a qualified person, not being involved in the assessment of the study, will administer the study treatment. Follow up DXA, Ca, P, ALP, Osteocalcin, Cross laps, Creatinin will be done to each subject before the treatment, 6 months later and after 12 months. IVA (vertebral deformity assessment) will be performed before the treatment and after 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEzeolite

given for a period of 12 months

DEVICEcellulose

given for a period of 12 months

Sponsors

University of Rijeka
CollaboratorOTHER
Polyclinic K-center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

The clinical study is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study aimed to assess the effect of zeolite-intervention in osteoporotic patients on the bone mineral density and bone turnover in comparison to osteoporotic patients control group that received the placebo over a period of for 12 months. The study population will consist of 100 patients with osteoporosis defined according BMD criteria: T score -2, 5 on the femoral neck, and, or T -2, 5 on L1-L5, who have not been treated before, or in whom privies treatment did not been successful, despite a gender or age. The Panaceo and Placebo groups will be divided into 50 and 50 patients.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 100 subjects with osteoporosis Among those, as a subgroup, 20 subjects with diabetes type 2 and osteoporosis * The osteoporosis- was diagnosed by standard DXA measurement (BMD T-score: - 2.5 or below )

Exclusion criteria

* chronic renal failure, secondary osteoporosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of BMD (Bone mineral density)0-6-12 monthsBMD measurements are used to see how well osteoporosis treatments are working

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cange of Bone remodelling marker Osteocalcin0-6-12 monthsOsteocalcin- parameter of the bone formation rate
Cange of Bone remodelling marker Betacross laps0-6-12 monthsBetacross laps - parameter of the bone degradation rate

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fractures and fallings12 monthsFracture: evaluation if yes) or no) Falling: Fracture as a consequence OR no fracture OR no fallings reported
Intensity of the musculoskeletal pain measured by VAS0-12 monthsthe scale based on patient's subjective evaluation at the beginning and at the end of the study.
Subjective evaluation of the overall health status and 6.0-12 monthsupon the end of the study in comparison to the beginning

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026