Skip to content

Feasibility of an Intervention to Increase Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Attendance

Feasibility of an Implementation Intervention to Increase Attendance at Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Protocol for a Cluster Randomised Pilot Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03901898
Enrollment
8
Registered
2019-04-03
Start date
2019-07-16
Completion date
2020-10-12
Last updated
2021-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Retinopathy

Keywords

screening, primary care, general practice, feasibility

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test a way to support practices to improve attendance at retinopathy screening among people with diabetes. This new approach will be delivered to staff in general practice and involves: 1) briefing and audit training for practice staff; 2) electronic alerts on patient files to prompt GPs and nurses to remind patients, 3) face-to-face, phone and letter reminders and a brief information sheet for people with diabetes who have not attended screening, and; 4) payment to practices. The practice will carry out an audit to identify patients who have not attended screening, and re-audit at 6 months to identify any changes in attendance. The study will test this new approach over six months in eight different practices to determine whether it is feasible to deliver in a real-world setting. Four practices will be randomly assigned to receive the new approach straight away (intervention group), while the other four practices will be assigned to the group who wait, deliver care as usual, and roll out the new approach after six months (wait-list-control group). After the new approach has been tested for six months, the research team will use staff questionnaires, and carry out focus groups and interviews with patients and practice staff to learn about their experiences. The time and resources needed to deliver the approach will also be recorded to estimate the cost of delivering the new approach and how feasible it would be to carry out a larger study.

Detailed description

Aims and objectives. The current study will address uncertainties about feasibility, economic evaluation, and the study procedures. The feasibility pilot study is needed to determine whether a larger-scale trial would be viable. Specifically, it will address the questions: 1. Are the intervention content, delivery and procedures acceptable to people with diabetes who will receive the intervention, and staff who will deliver the intervention? 2. Are the data collection processes, including mode and duration of data collection and outcome measures used, acceptable to staff? 3. Is the intervention feasible to deliver in primary care practice, in terms fidelity of delivery and receipt of the intervention? 4. Is the study feasible in terms of recruitment and retention procedures and data collection? 5. What are the costs associated with the intervention? Intervention. The intervention involves components which target practice staff (1. brief training 2. electronic prompt, and 3. reimbursement) and components which target patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who have not attended screening (1. face-to-face reminder message and information leaflet; 2. phone reminder; 3. GP-endorsed reminder letter and information leaflet). The intervention will be delivered over 6 months. The practice will conduct an audit of their patients with diabetes at baseline and re-audit at 6 months. Only practice staff will access patient files for the purpose of the audit. Only practice staff will have contact with patients during intervention delivery; a member of the practice team will issue the face-to-face, phone and letter reminders. Methods. IDEAs (Improving Diabetes Eye-screening Attendance) is a cluster randomised feasibility pilot trial, including an embedded process evaluation and economic evaluation. In the current study, general practices will be randomly allocated to intervention or wait-list control groups following stratification by practice size (i.e. single/two-handed or group practice (3 more or GPs). Practices in the wait-list control group will receive the same intervention at 6 months. A multi-method approach will be used to evaluate the trial and study procedures, and to examine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention from the perspective of practice staff and patients. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected on intervention delivery, research processes, and implementation outcomes. Data will be collected at the practice, health professional and patient level. Data will be collected by practice staff and study researchers during intervention delivery. An economic evaluation will be conducted to estimate the cost of delivering the intervention in general practice

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTraining, audit, and reminders

Briefing and training for participating practices, baseline practice audit, addition of electronic prompts to patient records, GP-endorsed patient reminders (in person, phone and letter), and re-audit at 6 months.

BEHAVIORALIntervention after 6 months (wait list)

After 6 months, practices receive the intervention: briefing and training for participating practices, baseline practice audit, addition of electronic prompts to patient records, GP-endorsed patient reminders (in person, phone and letter).

Sponsors

University College Cork
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Four practices will be randomly assigned to the intervention group, while the other four practices will be assigned to the wait list control group. The wait list control group will deliver care as usual, and deliver the intervention after six months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(practices): * Computerised record system * Practice nurse Inclusion Criteria (patients) * 18 years or over * Diagnosed diabetes (type 1 or type 2) * Has been audited as part of the practice-level intervention * Eligible to attend the national screening programme but has not registered, consented to, and attended the programme.

Exclusion criteria

(patients): • Has retinopathy and are currently under surveillance or receiving treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients who intend to contact RetinaScreen6 monthsPatient self-report during phone call from the practice
Number of patients who have contacted the national screening programme6 monthsPatient self-report during phone call from the practice
Number of patients who have attended screening6 monthsNumber obtained from practice electronic health records. Letter received from the national screening programme on patient record.

Countries

Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026