Skip to content

3D Analysis of the Effects of tDCS (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation) on a Functional Task in High Level Athletes

3D Analysis of the Effects of tDCS on a Functional Task in High Level Athletes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03901222
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-04-03
Start date
2019-03-31
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2020-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Athlete, Healthy

Keywords

tDCS, Athlete, Endurance, Fatigue, 3D

Brief summary

Relatively high level athletes will undergo 2 randomized, cross-over counterbalanced sessions of bi-anodal tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) or sham tDCS The primary outcome is a 3D evaluation coupled with EMG (Electromyography) of their primary lower limb muscles after each session

Detailed description

Recruitment : Relatively high level athletes will be recruited through social media and advertisements. Each subject came twice to the Liege University Hospitals' Human Movement Analysis Laboratory. After placing the different infrared emitters and placing and calibrating the surface EMG electrodes, subjects underwent 3 maximal squat jumps (without upper limb implication). They were then familiarized with the fatigue protocol (8 jumps at a 33 jumps per minute pace). Then each subject received either bi-anodal tDCS of sham tDCS. Neither the evaluator or the subject knew which they were receiving. Immediately following tDCS, subjects underwent another warmup 3 maximal squat jumps, and then the fatigue protocol (comprised of 30 maximal jumps at a rate of 33 per minute).

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

20 minutes of anodal tDCS (C3 & C4/FPZ) 2mA or sham

Sponsors

University of Liege
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The device is preprogrammed by a third party non participating in any element in the study. They then chose (using opaque envelopes) the treatment code for each participant

Intervention model description

Randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled, crossover

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least 10 hours of sport a week * Right handed and footed

Exclusion criteria

* One on the TSST (in high and relatively high risk sections) * Previous neurological or orthopedic pathologies affecting limbs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak HeightChanges between Prior and Immediately Following tDCS and ShamPeak height (measured by the 3D device) is measured after each of the 30 repetitions as well as after the 3 jumps before and after tDCS. Height decrease will also be looked at
Gluteal EMG (Electromyography) recordings (% of maximal EMG value)Changes between Prior and Immediately Following tDCS and ShamBilateral Gluteal EMG
Quadriceps EMG (Electromyography) recordings (% of maximal EMG value)Changes between Prior and Immediately Following tDCS and ShamBilateral Quadriceps EMG triceps surae will be measured
Triceps EMG (Electromyography) recordings (% of maximal EMG value)Changes between Prior and Immediately Following tDCS and ShamBilateral Triceps Surae EMG

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026