Skip to content

Peripheral Electrical Stimulation for Migraine Prevention

To Investigate the Effects of Peripheral Electrical Stimulation on Cortical Imagining, Electrophysiology and Clinical Profile in Patients With Migraine

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03900611
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-04-03
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2021-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine

Brief summary

Migraine is a common and disabling disease that affects more than 10% of the population worldwide. The prevalence of migraine in Taiwan is around 9.1%. The migraineurs missed 2 workdays due to migraine per year, that is 3.7 million estimated missed workdays in total and an estimated cost of 4.6 billion New Taiwan dollars. In addition, some migraineurs have poor response to the medications or suffer from adverse effects, and may further develop medication-overuse headache. Therefore, in recent years, efforts have been made to develop non-medication treatments, and the number of studies using neuromodulation as an intervention has increased dramatically. Among them, peripheral electrical stimulation has long been a routine treatment for pain in the clinic, and research has also shown its good evidence. In addition, recent studies have shown that peripheral electrical stimulation can also alter the cortical activities. Compared with the proximal brain stimulation, the remote electrical stimulation is safer, more convenient, less expensive and suitable for home use. To date, only one research had focused on the immediate anesthetic effect of remote electrical stimulation whereas the research for migraine prevention is still absent. Therefore, we expect to utilize a more remote electrical stimulation than trigeminal nerve electrical stimulation, which is the commonly used research method nowadays, as an interventional model. In three years, we will recruit 80 migraineurs along with 40 healthy controls and investigate the effects of 8-week home-based remote electrical stimulation on the prevention of migraine and the mechanisms using brain imaging, electrophysiological and biochemical examinations. We also aim to identify the predictors of the responders to remote electrical stimulation. If the effects of remote electrical stimulation are confirmed, as a non-drug neuromodulation management with features of non-invasive, low adverse effects and high accessibility, it will greatly lower the cost of social health care and better improve the quality of life and clinical status of the migraineurs.

Interventions

The subjects will undergo 8-week home-based peripheral electrical simulation on the median nerve. The peripheral electrical simulation will be performed once a day for 30 minutes. The stimulation will be active or sham depend on the group assignment.

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Migraine: 1. Diagnosed as migraine by International Classification of Headache Disorder (ICHD-III) criteria 2. onset before 50 years old 3. 20-65 yrs. 4. 4 or more migraine days per month in average * Healthy control: 1. devoid of any systemic or neurological diseases

Exclusion criteria

1. history of major systemic illness, including uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency, autoimmune diseases or malignancies 2. history of neurological disorders which might affect sensation such as previous stroke or peripheral neuropathy 3. pregnancy or lactation 4. epilepsy 5. moderate depressed (BDI\>20) 6. using prophylactics for migraine 7. other remote electrical stimulation contraindications, such as open wound, sensory impairment, metal implant 8. other transcranial magnetic stimulation contraindications, such as, high intracranial pressure, cochlear implant, cranial metal implant 9. other magnetic resonance imaging contraindications, such as, pacemaker, stent, metal implant, claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
responder rate2 monthsresponder rate (50% pain reduction from baseline)
change in migraine or headache days of a month in average2 monthschange in migraine or headache days of a month in average

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beck Depression Inventory2 months
modified Migraine Disability Scale2 monthsThis modified Migraine Disability Scale assesses the migraine related disability in the past 1 month. The total score will be compared and the lower score stands for better outcome.
Patient/Clinical Global Impression of Change2 monthsPatient/Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC/CGIC) are 7-point scales to assess the improvement by patients themselves and by their clinicians.
Sensory threshold change after treatment2 monthsUsing quantitative sensory testing (QST) to evaluate the sensory threshold before and after treatment
change in moderate to severe headache days of a month in average2 months
EEG change after treatment (2) Nonlinear analysis of EEG before and after treatment2 monthsfunctional connectivity change of EEG before and after treatment
fMRI change after treatment2 monthsfunctional connectivity change of fMRI before and after treatment
MRI change after treatment2 monthsVBM changes of MRI before and after treatment
EEG change after treatment (1) Linear analysis of EEG before and after treatment2 monthspower spectal density change of EEG before and after treatment
acute headache medication use2 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026