Skip to content

Face-to-face Versus Online Hypnotherapy for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Face-to-face Versus Online Hypnotherapy for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome, According to a Non-inferiority Design. Three-armed Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03899779
Acronym
FORTITUDE
Enrollment
282
Registered
2019-04-02
Start date
2019-07-08
Completion date
2025-06-29
Last updated
2025-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Brief summary

Psychological therapies are effective in reducing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptom severity and increasing quality of life and are recommended for the management of IBS by guidelines. Evidence appears strongest for the efficacy of hypnotherapy as psychological treatment. However, therapist-led interventions are time consuming and relatively costly. Approaches based on e-health are cost saving and appear more attractive to patients as no visits to a therapist are necessary. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a multicentre randomised controlled trial to examine whether the effectiveness of online hypnotherapy is non-inferior compared to individual face-to-face hypnotherapy delivered by a therapist, according to current FDA guidelines. Online psychoeducation will be used as control condition. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that treatment with online hypnotherapy is a more cost-effective therapy than face-to-face hypnotherapy in IBS patients.

Interventions

OTHERFace-to-face hypnotherapy

12 weeks treatment with face-to-face hypnotherapy (6 individual, bi-weekly sessions)

OTHEROnline hypnotherapy

12 weeks treatment with online hypnotherapy

12 weeks treatment with online psychoeducation

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 16-75 years * A diagnosis of IBS according to the Rome IV criteria * In the presence of alarm symptoms, such as rectal blood loss, weight loss, anemia, first onset of symptoms above 50 years of age, patients will be first referred for further investigation by their treating physician to exclude organic disorders, conform current Dutch guidelines for IBS. * Women in fertile age must use contraception or be postmenopausal for at least two years.

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient command of the Dutch language * No access to internet * Evidence of current anxiety and/or depression disorder as defined by a score ≥10 on the GAD-7 and/or PHQ-9 questionnaire. In this case it is conceivable that the IBS symptoms are strongly related to psychopathology for which different treatment might be more appropriate. * History of ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, coeliac disease or significant liver disease * Major surgery to the lower gastrointestinal tract, such as partial or total colectomy, small bowel resection or partial or total gastrectomy * Past or present radiotherapy to the abdomen * Current pregnancy or lactation * Using of psychoactive medication in case there's no stable dose for at least 3 months prior to inclusion * Use of over-the-counter or prescription antidiarrheals, analgesics and laxatives (only be allowed as specific rescue medication) * Hypnotherapy treatment received in the last 3 months prior to inclusion * Using more than 20 units of alcohol per week * Using drugs of abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Abdominal pain response rate after 12 weeks of treatment12 weeksA responder is defined as a patient who experiences at least a 30 percent decrease in the weekly average of worst daily abdominal pain (measured daily, on an 11 point NRS) compared to baseline weekly average in at least 50 percent of the weeks in which the treatment in given.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of symptom severity16 weeksdetermined by the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) by 50 points or more \[IBS-SSS, minimum score 0, maximum score 500\]
Indirect costs16 weeks and after 6 months and 1 year follow-updetermined by Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ) (savings from increased work productivity)
Direct costs16 weeks and after 6 months and 1 year follow-updetermined by Medical Consumption Questionnaire (MCQ) (savings from reduced medical resource use)
General Quality of life (by EQ-5D)16 weeks and after 6 months and 1 year follow-upDetermined by the Euro-Quality of Life - 5 domains (EQ-5D-5L) (change from baseline)
IBS related Quality of life (by IBS-QoL)16 weeks and after 6 months and 1 year follow-upDetermined by IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) (change from baseline) \[IBS-QoL, minimum score: 0, maximum score 100\]
Degree of relief response rate after 12 weeks of treatment12 weeksA responder is defined as a patient who experiences a weekly relief of 1 or 2 (on a 7 point NRS) in at least 50 percent of the weeks in which treatment is given.
Number and severity of side effects12 and 16 weeksAs reported via digital diary (mobile phone application)
Expectation16 weeksResponse rates in relation to patient expectation prior to the start of treatment
Response rates in relation to comorbid anxiety16 weeks and after 6 months and 1 year follow-upAssessed with the use of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). \[GAD-7 minimum score: 0, maximum score: 21\]
Response rates in relation to comorbid depression16 weeks and after 6 months and 1 year follow-upAssessed with the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). \[PHQ-9 minimum score: 0, maximum score: 21\]
Use of over the counter medication and rescue medication12 and 16 weeksAs reported via digital diary (mobile phone application)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 27, 2026