Skip to content

COMPARISON OF KOHLI AND FOLEY CATHETERS IN SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER PATIENTS

FOLEY VERSUS KOHLI FOR SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS STUDY

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03897959
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-04-01
Start date
2019-03-03
Completion date
2020-05-30
Last updated
2019-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Infection, Complications; Catheter

Keywords

suprapubic, urinary catheter

Brief summary

The purpose of this medical research study is to compare two different urinary drainage catheters to see which has fewer problems with blockages and pain. The study involves completing 16 weekly 3-question surveys either online or by phone. The new catheters are FDA-approved and will be provided for FREE. No medications will be given.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to see if a redesign of the catheter to remove the extended tip of the conventional urinary catheter will reduce problems with catheter blockage or catheter-associated discomfort. By eliminating the extended tip, the bladder wall will no longer be subject to the tip rubbing on the bladder wall. This could lead to fewer problems with blockages and less irritation and trauma to the bladder lining. A reduction in trauma to the bladder wall could reduce pain, bladder inflammation/irritation and the risk of urinary tract infections.

Interventions

DEVICEKohli vs Foley catheter

Alternative suprapubic catheter used for bladder drainage.

Sponsors

Nellie Medical, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will utilize existing urinary drainage catheter for 30 days and then switch to alternative for 30 days. Patient will repeat this cycle once more.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Indwelling suprapubic Foley urinary catheter for at least 30 days prior to entry with anticipation for continued indwelling urinary catheterization for at least 30 days after entry into the study. * Catheter associated discomfort or difficulty with mucous plugging of the catheter.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent * No catheter associated discomfort or problems with mucous plugging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suprapubic catheter blockage - failure to drain1 yearTo determine whether an indwelling suprapubic low profile Kohli Atraumatic Catheter causes less patient-reported mucous plugging than a traditional indwelling suprapubic Foley catheter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suprapubic catheter pain1 yearTo determine whether an indwelling suprapubic low profile Kohli Atraumatic Catheter causes less patient-defined discomfort than a traditional indwelling suprapubic Foley catheter. Pain will be accessed using a Visual Analog Pain scale.
Suprapubic catheter urinary tract infection (UTI)1 yearTo determine whether an indwelling suprapubic low profile Kohli Atraumatic Catheter reduces catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI's) than a traditional indwelling suprapubic Foley catheter. Patient symptoms such as hematuria, lower abdomen discomfort, frequent, painful urination, and pelvic pressure will be used to diagnose the presence of UTI.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRonald D Adams, MS
info@kohlicatheter.com7758007300
Backup ContactNeeraj Kohli, MD
nkohli@bostonurogyn.com617-340-6446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026