Skip to content

Combination of Thrombopoietin Mimetic and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Aplastic Anaemia

Treatment With Thrombopoietin Mimetic Plus Immunosuppressive Therapy in Egyptian Patients With Aplastic Anaemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03896971
Enrollment
66
Registered
2019-04-01
Start date
2019-11-15
Completion date
2021-06-01
Last updated
2021-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aplastic Anemia

Keywords

thrombopoietin mimetic, Egyptian, Aplastic

Brief summary

To the investigator's Knowledge this is the first study that will assess Treatment with thrombopoietin Mimetic plus immunosuppressiveTherapy in Egyptian Patients with Aplastic Anaemia. Aim of the work : 1. To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and toxicity of the combination of thrombopoietin mimetic and immunosuppressive therapy in Egyptian patients with AA. 2. To study the influence of this combination on patients' quality of life. 3. To access evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplastic syndrome , acute leukemia or development of fibrosis

Detailed description

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a bone marrow failure syndrome that, although benign in nature, it influences patients' quality of life and carries poor prognosis.The pathophysiological basis of development of acquired AA include immune-mediated attack, inherent hematopoietic stem cell insufficiency and telomere defects. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the only curative treatment for AA. Unfortunately it is unavailable for many patients due to lack of matched donors furthermore others are ineligible for BMT due to old age or co-morbid conditions. Immunosuppressive therapy was the mainstay of treatment for AA for many years, however many patients developed resistance or refractoriness. Immunosuppressive therapy was in the form of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) which gave hematologic response in nearly 50% of patients , adding cyclosporin A increases this response to 70%. Why some patients became resistant to immunosuppressive therapy ? The answer is not known. Thrombopoietin mimetic (Eltrombopag) was firstly FDA approved for treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Numerous clinical trials proved the efficacy of anthropometric mimetic in patients with refractory severe AA, leading to its FDA approval for this group of patients. Some researchers proven the efficacy of thrombopoietin mimetic in patients with moderate aplastic anemia. This study aimed to asses the combination of thrombopoietin mimetic and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with AA.

Interventions

DRUGCombination of thrombopoietin mimetic and cyclosporin A

This is a controlled interventional study that will be carried out in the Clinical Hematology Unit, at the Department of Internal Medicine , Assiut University Hospital. Patients will be recruited among those who attending the outpatient clinic or admitted in the unit.

Sponsors

Assiut University
CollaboratorOTHER
Safaa AA Khaled
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two groups of patients will be included one group will be treated with thrombopoietin mimetic and immunosuppressive therapy , another matched group treated with immunosuppressive therapy alone and enrolled retrospectively

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for treatment with thrombopoietin mimetic. * Willing to participate in the study and signed informed consent. * Unavailability of BMT -

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with inherited aplastic anemia * Underlying immune deficiency * Contra indication to cyclosporin A * Endstage hepatic or renal disease * Pregnancy and lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with hematologjc response2-3months1. Platelet number ( time frame(2-3 months) : Increase plt count 20, 000 or more from baseline or independence of platelet transfusion for 2 months 2. Hemoglobin percent (time frame (2-3 months): increase Hb by 1.5 g/dl from baseline or reduction 4 units of packed red blood cell transfusions for 2- months C) Absolute neutrophilic count response (time frame (2-3 months): increase absolute neutrophil count by 500 per microliter from baseline. d) Bone marrow cellularity (time frame (2-3 months): increase bone marrow cellularity from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with one of the following2-3months1. Toxicity: development of toxicity leading to cessation of treatment 2. Evolution: evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria , myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia 3. Bleeding and cytopenias that met the criteria for severe aplastic anemia and require transfusions

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026