Skip to content

Coronary Artery Ectasia in Elective Coronary Angiography : Predictors, Outcomes and Management

Coronary Artery Ectasia in Elective Coronary Angiography : Predictors, Outcomes and Management

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03896321
Enrollment
79
Registered
2019-03-29
Start date
2019-12-01
Completion date
2022-02-01
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ectasia, Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is the diffuse dilatation of coronary artery. It is defined as a dilatation with a diameter of 1.5 times the adjacent normal coronary artery . Its prevalence ranges from 1.2%-4.9% with male to female ratio of 3:1 . Coronary ectasia likely represents an exaggerated form of expansive vascular remodelling (i.e. excessive expansive remodelling) in response to atherosclerotic plaque growth . CAE is more common in males. Hypertension is a risk Factor. Interestingly, patients with DM have low incidence of CAE. This may be due to down regulation of MMP with negative remodelling in response to atherosclerosis . Smoking appears to be more common in patients with CAE than in those with coronary artery disease (CAD). The angiographic classification for CAE (described by Markis et al.) categorizes the severity based on the extent of coronary arterial involvement: Type 1: Diffuse ectasia of 2-3 arteries; Type 2: Diffuse ectasia in one artery and localized in another; Type 3: Diffuse single arterial ectasia; Type 4: Localized or segmental ectasia . Stable angina is the most common presentation in patients with CAE . Patients with CAE without stenosis had positive results during treadmill exercise tests. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) , non-ST elevation MI can occur from altered blood flow by distal embolization or occlusion of ectatic segment with thrombus. Medical management for CAE is a controversial area as there is lack of evidence based medicine, especially the role of antiplatelet versus anticoagulant agents. Aspirin was suggested in all patients because of coexistence of CAE with obstructive coronary lesions in the great majority of patients and the observed incidence of myocardial infarction, even in patients with isolated coronary ectasia .The role of dual anti platelet therapy has not been evaluated in prospective randomized studies. Based on the significant flow disturbances within the ectatic segments, chronic anticoagulation with warfarin as main therapy was suggested

Interventions

effect of dual antiplatelet in management of coronary artery ectasia

DRUGAnticoagulants

effect of oral anticoagulants in management of coronary artery ectasia

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with suspected CAD who are referred for elective coronary angiography

Exclusion criteria

* Previous admission with an acute coronary event, previous PCI or CABG. * History of bleeding tendency or those with high bleeding risk according to the HAS-BLED bleeding risk score

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy vs oral anticoagulants in patients with CAE - occurance of major adverse cardiovascular events6 monthsEfficacy endpoints defined as the occurance of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
safety of dual antiplatelet therapy vs oral anticoagulants in patients with CAE - occurance of major or minor bleeding6 monthssafety endpoints of occurance of major or minor bleeding

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026