Skip to content

An Extension Study of MOM-M281-004 to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of M281 Administered to Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

An Open-label Extension Study of MOM-M281-004 to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of M281 Administered to Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03896295
Enrollment
37
Registered
2019-03-29
Start date
2019-08-06
Completion date
2020-12-09
Last updated
2023-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Keywords

M281, Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of M281 in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG)

Interventions

DRUGM281

M281 injection administered as intravenous infusion

Sponsors

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants must be ≥18 years of age with a documented history of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) and clinical signs/symptoms of gMG, not pregnant or breastfeeding, previously participated in the MOM-281-004 study, had no major eligibility deviations or other major protocol deviations or not met any of the stopping criteria or discontinued study drug in the MOM-M281-004 study for any reason other than the need for rescue therapy as specified in the MOM-M281-004 study. Additional, more specific criteria are defined in the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterUp to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with at least one value above upper limit of normal (\>ULN) or below the lower limit of normal (\< LLN) value of coagulation parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time \[APTT\] and prothrombin time \[PT\]) were reported. The lab reference range for APTT is 25.1 to 36.5 seconds. The lab reference range for PT is 9.4 to 12.5 seconds.
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and direct bilirubin were reported.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes (Red Blood Cell)Baseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in erythrocytes (red blood cells) (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in hematology laboratory parameters: basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets and leukocytes were reported.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) ConcentrationBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin (HGB) concentration (hematology laboratory parameter) were reported.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: HematocritBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in hematocrit (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: HemoglobinBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in hemoglobin (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.
Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: pHBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in pH (urinalysis laboratory parameter) was reported.
Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: Specific GravityBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in specific gravity (urinalysis laboratory parameter) was reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesUp to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with treatment-emergent abnormal ECG values for variables including mean heart rate (abnormally low refers to less than or equal to \[\<=\] 50 beats per minute \[bpm\], abnormally high refers greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 120 bpm), PR interval (abnormally low refers to \< 120 and abnormally high refers to \>200 milliseconds \[msec\]), RR interval (abnormally low refers to \<600 msec and abnormally high refers to \>1200 msec) and QRS duration (abnormally \> 120) were reported.
Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresUp to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with C-SSRS scores were reported. C-SSRS is a clinician-administered questionnaire designed to solicit occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related ideation and behaviors. Total score ranges from 1 to 10, score of 0 was assigned (0=no event that can be assessed based on C-SSRS). Higher total scores indicate greater severity. Maximum score assigned for each participant was summarized into one of 3 categories: no suicidal ideation or behavior (0), suicidal ideation (1 to 5): higher score indicates more suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior (6 to 10): higher score indicates more suicidal behavior. Suicidal ideation includes participants who did not have suicidal ideation or behavior at baseline and had suicidal ideation without behavior at some time point post-baseline. Suicidal behavior includes participants who did not have suicidal ideation or behavior at baseline and had suicidal behavior at some time point post-baseline (baseline=Day 1).
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB)Baseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in erythrocytes mean corpuscular HGB (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular VolumeBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to 257 days post-baseline (Baseline is Day 1)Number of participants with TEAEs were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAEs are defined as any AE occurring during or after the initiation of the first infusion of study drug in this study.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 257 days post-baselineAn adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that results in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)Up to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with treatment-emergent AESIs were reported. Severe infections and hypoalbuminemia (Grade 3 or higher according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] v5.0) were considered as AESIs.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsUp to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with treatment-emergent abnormal vital signs including pulse rate (less than or equal to \[\<=\] 50 beats per minutes \[bpm\] with greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 15 bpm decrease from baseline, \>= 120 bpm with \>=15 bpm increase from baseline), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (\<= 90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] with \>= 20 mmHg decrease from baseline, \>= 160 mmHg with \>= 20 mmHg increase from baseline) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (\<= 50 mmHg with \>=15 mmHg decrease from baseline, \>=100 mmHg with \>=15 mmHg decrease from baseline) were reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsWeek 12Number of participants with abnormalities in physical examinations (abdomen, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, and sinuses, lungs, neurological, skin, blood and lymphatic system, cardiovascular, chest, gastrointestinal, general appearance and musculoskeletal) were reported.
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters: albumin and protein were reported.
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters: bicarbonate, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, glucose, phosphate, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, urate and urea nitrogen were reported.
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseBaseline up to Week 12Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or greater than or equal to (\>=) 8-point improvement in total MG-ADL score over time were reported. MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeBaseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)The QMG test was used to assess the participant's strength. The quantitative results of each of the 13 strength components were mapped to a 4-point scale where 0 equals to (=) none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe. The total score is the sum of the 13 scale scores and ranges from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicated more severe impairment.
Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeBaseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)The MG-QoL15r was used to assess the participant's limitations related to living with MG. It consists of 15 questions and each of the 15 questions were rated by the participant on a 3-point scale (0= Not at all, 1= somewhat, 2=very much) based on a recall period of over the past few weeks. The total score is the sum of the 15 question scores and ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicated more limitation.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeBaseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)The CGI-S scale is the clinician/physician's global assessment of participants illness severity of MG and is rated by answering on 8-point scale. Considering total clinical experience, participant is assessed on severity of illness according to: 0=not performed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline illness; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill patients. Higher scores indicated more severity of illness. Values of 0 (not assessed) were excluded from analysis. CGI-S permits global evaluation of participant's condition at given time.
Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)Number of participants with improvement of illness based on CGI-I scale score over time were reported. The CGI-I scale is the clinician/physician's global assessment of the change in severity of the patient's generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) since starting this study. The rating is given on a 7-point scale with lower scores indicating greater improvement (1= Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 3 = Minimally improved; 4 = No change; 5 =Minimally worse; 6 = Much worse; 7 = Very much worse. Values of 0 (not assessed) were excluded from analysis. Higher score indicates more severity.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeeks 8, 24 and End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline)Number of participants with change from baseline in MGFA classification score over time were reported. The MGFA was used to assess the participant's MG severity. MGFA classification identifies the subgroup participants with MG who share distinct clinical features or severity of disease: Class I (ocular MG), classes II, III and IV generalized MG with mild, moderate and severe disease, respectively; Class V MG crisis. Separate subclasses under classes II, III and IV are designed: a if the predominant weakness is affecting limb/axial weakness or both; subclass b if the predominant weakness is affecting oropharyngeal or respiratory muscles or both. In the MGFA classification, lower roman numerals mean less severity. Changes in MGFA classification (regardless of subclass) are categorized as Improved (example, III to II), Same (example, II to II), or Worsened (example, II to III).
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to NipocalimabUp to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with ADA to nipocalimab were reported. The presence of ADA to nipocalimab in serum was determined by a sensitive and drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to NipocalimabUp to 257 days post-baselineNumber of participants with NAbs were reported. Neutralizing antibodies to nipocalimab were assessed using a non-cell based competitive ligand binding ECLIA assay.
Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeBaseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, up to 253 days post-baseline, up to 257 days post-baselineChange from baseline in serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G concentration over time was reported.
Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeBaseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)The MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants from study MOM-M281-004 (NCT03772587) who completed the Day 113 visit of that study were eligible to enroll in this open-label extension study (MOM-M281-005). The Day 113 visit of MOM-M281-004 occurred approximately 8 weeks after the last dose in that study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo-Nipocalimab
Participants who received placebo in MOM-M281-004 (NCT03772587) study rolled-over and received intravenous (IV) infusion of nipocalimab (M281) 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks (Q4W) starting Day 1 up to 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of treatment on a stable dose of nipocalimab, the dose and/or dosing frequency could be individually adjusted, at the investigator's discretion to receive maximum dose of 60 mg/kg at a frequency of not exceeding every 2 weeks (Q2W).
7
Nipocalimab-Nipocalimab
Participants who received nipocalimab in MOM-M281-004 study rolled-over and received IV infusion of nipocalimab 30 mg/kg Q4W starting Day 1 up to 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of treatment on a stable dose of nipocalimab, the dose and/or dosing frequency could be individually adjusted, at the investigator's discretion to receive maximum dose of 60 mg/kg at a frequency of not exceeding Q2W.
30
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyCOVID-19729

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo-NipocalimabTotalNipocalimab-Nipocalimab
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants25 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.39
53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.33
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.93
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants33 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
5 Participants34 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITALY
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
0 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
2 Participants15 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants22 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants15 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 71 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 717 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 74 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase

Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific categories. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseALT17.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.76
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseAlkaline Phosphatase6.3 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 2.06
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseAST23.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 47.67
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseCreatine Kinase-17.8 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 33.13
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseGamma Glutamyl Transferase4.3 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 11.95
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate Dehydrogenase30.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 15.68
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate Dehydrogenase30.9 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 58.1
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseALT2.6 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 5.33
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseCreatine Kinase13.6 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 38.34
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseGamma Glutamyl Transferase1.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 13.21
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseAlkaline Phosphatase5.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 11.46
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseAST0.9 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 3.42
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseAlkaline Phosphatase5.4 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 10.23
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseAST5.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 20.8
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate Dehydrogenase30.7 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 52
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseCreatine Kinase7.7 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 38.73
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseALT5.3 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 13.43
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate DehydrogenaseGamma Glutamyl Transferase2.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 12.74
Primary

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and Protein

Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters: albumin and protein were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure (OM). As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinAlbumin-1.5 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.89
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinProtein-3.5 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.08
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinAlbumin-1.2 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 3.21
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinProtein-3.8 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 4.99
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinAlbumin-1.3 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 3.08
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Albumin and ProteinProtein-3.7 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 4.54
Primary

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea Nitrogen

Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters: bicarbonate, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, glucose, phosphate, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, urate and urea nitrogen were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenSodium0.8 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.96
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenGlucose0.280 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5054
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenUrate-0.0090 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.04285
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenPotassium0.05 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.173
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenPhosphate-0.018 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0971
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenBicarbonate-2.0 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.45
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenChloride0.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.91
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenCalcium0.010 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0627
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenTriglycerides0.223 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5799
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenCholesterol0.480 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.01
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenUrea Nitrogen-0.270 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.783
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenPhosphate-0.002 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.1903
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenBicarbonate1.6 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.91
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenCalcium-0.018 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.1005
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenChloride0.6 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.85
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenCholesterol0.261 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5732
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenGlucose-0.258 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.1401
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenPotassium0.05 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.583
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenSodium1.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.18
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenTriglycerides0.081 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.3223
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenUrate0.0174 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0479
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenUrea Nitrogen-0.105 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.7292
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenUrate0.124 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.04716
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenSodium1.2 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenChloride0.6 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.66
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenBicarbonate1.0 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.14
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenTriglycerides0.108 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.3699
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenCalcium-0.013 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0938
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenPhosphate-0.005 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.1744
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenGlucose-0.155 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.0607
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenUrea Nitrogen-0.136 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.6951
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenPotassium0.05 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.526
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urate and Urea NitrogenCholesterol0.303 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.6509
Primary

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct Bilirubin

Change from baseline in chemistry laboratory parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and direct bilirubin were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific categories. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinCreatinine-9.0 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 7.35
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinBilirubin0.13 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 2.616
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinDirect Bilirubin-1.20 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinCreatinine-2.6 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 13.2
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinBilirubin-0.59 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 2.403
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinDirect Bilirubin-0.70 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 0.283
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinBilirubin-0.46 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 2.393
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinDirect Bilirubin-0.87 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 0.359
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Direct BilirubinCreatinine-3.9 micromoles per liter (micromol/L)Standard Deviation 12.41
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Change from baseline in erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume2.45 femtoliters (fL)Standard Deviation 6.174
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume-1.41 femtoliters (fL)Standard Deviation 3.406
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume-0.64 femtoliters (fL)Standard Deviation 4.206
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes (Red Blood Cell)

Change from baseline in erythrocytes (red blood cells) (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes (Red Blood Cell)0.188 10^12 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.0822
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes (Red Blood Cell)0.121 10^12 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.2702
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes (Red Blood Cell)0.135 10^12 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.2438
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit

Change from baseline in hematocrit (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit0.0278 liter of cells per liter of blood (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.03542
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit0.0048 liter of cells per liter of blood (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.02401
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit0.0094 liter of cells per liter of blood (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.02725
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin

Change from baseline in hemoglobin (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin5.8 g/LStandard Deviation 4.65
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin0.6 g/LStandard Deviation 7.29
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin1.7 g/LStandard Deviation 7.06
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and Leukocytes

Change from baseline in hematology laboratory parameters: basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets and leukocytes were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific categories. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesEosinophils0.015 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.0465
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesNeutrophils-0.433 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.5744
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesMonocytes-0.105 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.1964
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesBasophils-0.003 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.015
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesLeukocytes-0.568 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.9214
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesPlatelets27.8 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 11.81
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesLymphocytes-0.045 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.4498
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesMonocytes0.059 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.2008
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesBasophils0.010 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.02
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesEosinophils0.013 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.0776
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesLymphocytes0.063 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.4715
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesNeutrophils0.411 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 1.8622
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesPlatelets12.3 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 53.2
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesLeukocytes0.567 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 1.9956
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesNeutrophils0.243 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 1.7058
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesEosinophils0.014 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.0702
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesLeukocytes0.340 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 1.8694
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesPlatelets15.4 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 47.93
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesMonocytes0.027 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.2061
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesLymphocytes0.041 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.4576
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Laboratory Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and LeukocytesBasophils0.006 10^9 cells count per LiterStandard Deviation 0.0188
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB)

Change from baseline in erythrocytes mean corpuscular HGB (hematology laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB)0.03 picograms (pg)Standard Deviation 0.873
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB)-0.61 picograms (pg)Standard Deviation 0.813
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB)-0.48 picograms (pg)Standard Deviation 0.842
Primary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration

Change from baseline in erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin (HGB) concentration (hematology laboratory parameter) were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration-6.5 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 25.7
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration-2.1 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 7.61
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration-3.0 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 12.38
Primary

Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: pH

Change from baseline in pH (urinalysis laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: pH-0.8 pHStandard Deviation 0.96
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: pH0.0 pHStandard Deviation 1.06
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: pH-0.1 pHStandard Deviation 1.06
Primary

Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: Specific Gravity

Change from baseline in specific gravity (urinalysis laboratory parameter) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: Specific Gravity-0.0003 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0066
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: Specific Gravity-0.0030 ratioStandard Deviation 0.00973
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameter: Specific Gravity-0.0025 ratioStandard Deviation 0.00914
Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical Examinations

Number of participants with abnormalities in physical examinations (abdomen, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, and sinuses, lungs, neurological, skin, blood and lymphatic system, cardiovascular, chest, gastrointestinal, general appearance and musculoskeletal) were reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure (OM). Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific categories. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsNeurological0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsLungs0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsAbdomen1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsHead, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat and Sinuses0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsSkin1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsLungs0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsAbdomen0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsHead, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat and Sinuses0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsNeurological1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsSkin4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsSkin5 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsNeurological1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsAbdomen1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsLungs0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical ExaminationsHead, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat and Sinuses0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory Parameter

Number of participants with at least one value above upper limit of normal (\>ULN) or below the lower limit of normal (\< LLN) value of coagulation parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time \[APTT\] and prothrombin time \[PT\]) were reported. The lab reference range for APTT is 25.1 to 36.5 seconds. The lab reference range for PT is 9.4 to 12.5 seconds.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterPT (>ULN)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterAPTT (>ULN)2 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterPT (<ULN)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterAPTT (<LLN)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterPT (>ULN)8 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterAPTT (<LLN)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterPT (<ULN)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterAPTT (>ULN)15 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterPT (<ULN)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterAPTT (>ULN)17 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterAPTT (<LLN)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Below/Above Normal Values of Coagulation Laboratory ParameterPT (>ULN)9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Scores

Number of participants with C-SSRS scores were reported. C-SSRS is a clinician-administered questionnaire designed to solicit occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related ideation and behaviors. Total score ranges from 1 to 10, score of 0 was assigned (0=no event that can be assessed based on C-SSRS). Higher total scores indicate greater severity. Maximum score assigned for each participant was summarized into one of 3 categories: no suicidal ideation or behavior (0), suicidal ideation (1 to 5): higher score indicates more suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior (6 to 10): higher score indicates more suicidal behavior. Suicidal ideation includes participants who did not have suicidal ideation or behavior at baseline and had suicidal ideation without behavior at some time point post-baseline. Suicidal behavior includes participants who did not have suicidal ideation or behavior at baseline and had suicidal behavior at some time point post-baseline (baseline=Day 1).

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresSuicidal Ideation1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresNo Suicidal Ideation/Behavior5 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresNo Suicidal Ideation/Behavior30 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresNo Suicidal Ideation/Behavior35 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoresSuicidal Ideation1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that results in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) Values

Number of participants with treatment-emergent abnormal ECG values for variables including mean heart rate (abnormally low refers to less than or equal to \[\<=\] 50 beats per minute \[bpm\], abnormally high refers greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 120 bpm), PR interval (abnormally low refers to \< 120 and abnormally high refers to \>200 milliseconds \[msec\]), RR interval (abnormally low refers to \<600 msec and abnormally high refers to \>1200 msec) and QRS duration (abnormally \> 120) were reported.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesECG Mean Heart Rate (>=120)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesRR Interval (<600)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesPR Interval (> 200)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesECG Mean Heart Rate (<= 50)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesQRS Duration (>120)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesRR Interval (>=1200)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesPR Interval (<120)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesPR Interval (> 200)5 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesECG Mean Heart Rate (<= 50)5 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesECG Mean Heart Rate (>=120)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesPR Interval (<120)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesRR Interval (<600)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesRR Interval (>=1200)4 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesQRS Duration (>120)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesRR Interval (<600)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesECG Mean Heart Rate (>=120)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesQRS Duration (>120)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesRR Interval (>=1200)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesPR Interval (> 200)5 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesPR Interval (<120)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) ValuesECG Mean Heart Rate (<= 50)5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital Signs

Number of participants with treatment-emergent abnormal vital signs including pulse rate (less than or equal to \[\<=\] 50 beats per minutes \[bpm\] with greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 15 bpm decrease from baseline, \>= 120 bpm with \>=15 bpm increase from baseline), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (\<= 90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] with \>= 20 mmHg decrease from baseline, \>= 160 mmHg with \>= 20 mmHg increase from baseline) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (\<= 50 mmHg with \>=15 mmHg decrease from baseline, \>=100 mmHg with \>=15 mmHg decrease from baseline) were reported.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsPulse rate: <=50 bpm with >=15 bpm decrease from baseline0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsPulse rate: >= 120 bpm with >=15 bpm increase from baseline0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsSBP: <= 90 mmHg with >= 20 mmHg decrease from baseline0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsSBP: >= 160 mmHg with >= 20 mmHg increase from baseline0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsDBP: <= 50 mmHg with >=15 mmHg decrease from baseline0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsDBP: >=100 mmHg with >=15 mmHg decrease from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsDBP: >=100 mmHg with >=15 mmHg decrease from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsPulse rate: <=50 bpm with >=15 bpm decrease from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsSBP: >= 160 mmHg with >= 20 mmHg increase from baseline1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsDBP: <= 50 mmHg with >=15 mmHg decrease from baseline2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsPulse rate: >= 120 bpm with >=15 bpm increase from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsSBP: <= 90 mmHg with >= 20 mmHg decrease from baseline1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsPulse rate: >= 120 bpm with >=15 bpm increase from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsSBP: <= 90 mmHg with >= 20 mmHg decrease from baseline1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsDBP: >=100 mmHg with >=15 mmHg decrease from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsSBP: >= 160 mmHg with >= 20 mmHg increase from baseline1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsPulse rate: <=50 bpm with >=15 bpm decrease from baseline0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormal Vital SignsDBP: <= 50 mmHg with >=15 mmHg decrease from baseline2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

Number of participants with treatment-emergent AESIs were reported. Severe infections and hypoalbuminemia (Grade 3 or higher according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] v5.0) were considered as AESIs.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Number of participants with TEAEs were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAEs are defined as any AE occurring during or after the initiation of the first infusion of study drug in this study.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline (Baseline is Day 1)

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)18 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)22 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over Time

The CGI-S scale is the clinician/physician's global assessment of participants illness severity of MG and is rated by answering on 8-point scale. Considering total clinical experience, participant is assessed on severity of illness according to: 0=not performed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline illness; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill patients. Higher scores indicated more severity of illness. Values of 0 (not assessed) were excluded from analysis. CGI-S permits global evaluation of participant's condition at given time.

Time frame: Baseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 8-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 240.0 score on a scale
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 24-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeWeek 24-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over Time

Change from baseline in serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G concentration over time was reported.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, up to 253 days post-baseline, up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' included the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 24-3.870 g/L
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 8-2.996 g/LStandard Deviation 1.3773
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over Time257 days post-baseline-1.150 g/LStandard Deviation 0.5687
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 12-3.243 g/LStandard Deviation 1.6378
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 4-3.234 g/LStandard Deviation 1.1858
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 2-6.888 g/LStandard Deviation 0.6104
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over Time253 days post-baseline-3.494 g/LStandard Deviation 1.9208
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 2-5.457 g/LStandard Deviation 1.251
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 4-2.796 g/LStandard Deviation 0.9728
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 8-3.122 g/LStandard Deviation 1.3466
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 12-3.639 g/LStandard Deviation 2.2627
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 24-4.072 g/LStandard Deviation 1.2826
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over Time257 days post-baseline-0.020 g/LStandard Deviation 1.6162
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 4-2.866 g/LStandard Deviation 1.0014
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over Time257 days post-baseline-0.289 g/LStandard Deviation 1.5056
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 24-4.038 g/LStandard Deviation 1.1502
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over Time253 days post-baseline-3.494 g/LStandard Deviation 1.9208
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 8-3.095 g/LStandard Deviation 1.3235
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 2-5.681 g/LStandard Deviation 1.2804
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Concentration Over TimeWeek 12-3.563 g/LStandard Deviation 2.1269
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over Time

The MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.

Time frame: Baseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.35
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.0 score on a scale
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 40.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Myasthenia Gravis - Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over Time

The QMG test was used to assess the participant's strength. The quantitative results of each of the 13 strength components were mapped to a 4-point scale where 0 equals to (=) none, 1= mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe. The total score is the sum of the 13 scale scores and ranges from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicated more severe impairment.

Time frame: Baseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-3.0 score on a scale
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 8-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.66
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 41.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 81.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 24-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 80.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeWeek 24-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over Time

The MG-QoL15r was used to assess the participant's limitations related to living with MG. It consists of 15 questions and each of the 15 questions were rated by the participant on a 3-point scale (0= Not at all, 1= somewhat, 2=very much) based on a recall period of over the past few weeks. The total score is the sum of the 15 question scores and ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicated more limitation.

Time frame: Baseline up to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.72
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 8-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.97
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 24-3.0 score on a scale
Placebo-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 41.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.85
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 8-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.34
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.28
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.53
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabChange From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 12-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.57
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 8-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.23
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 12-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeWeek 24-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Total Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life - 15 Scale (MG-QoL15r) Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.28
Secondary

Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over Time

Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or greater than or equal to (\>=) 8-point improvement in total MG-ADL score over time were reported. MG-ADL was used to assess the participant's MG symptom severity. It assesses eight functions (talking, chewing, swallowing, breathing, impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair, impairment of ability to arise from a chair, double vision, and eyelid droop) which were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). The total score is the sum of the eight function scores and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity/difficulty in performing daily living activities.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (6 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (6 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (6 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (2 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (2 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (2 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (3 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (5 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (6 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (3 Point Improvement)4 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (6 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (>= 8 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (6 Point Improvement)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (2 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (4 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (6 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (3 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (5 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (6 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (7 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (2 Point Improvement)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (3 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (6 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (3 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (6 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (3 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (6 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (3 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (5 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (>= 8 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (5 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (6 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (6 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (5 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (4 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (7 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (6 Point Improvement)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (3 Point Improvement)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (2 Point Improvement)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 8 (2 Point Improvement)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 12 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (>= 8 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (2 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (6 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (3 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (2 Point Improvement)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 24 (4 Point Improvement)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With a 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, or Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 8-point Improvement in Total MG-ADL Score Over TimeWeek 4 (7 Point Improvement)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Nipocalimab

Number of participants with ADA to nipocalimab were reported. The presence of ADA to nipocalimab in serum was determined by a sensitive and drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Nipocalimab1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Nipocalimab16 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Nipocalimab17 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over Time

Number of participants with change from baseline in MGFA classification score over time were reported. The MGFA was used to assess the participant's MG severity. MGFA classification identifies the subgroup participants with MG who share distinct clinical features or severity of disease: Class I (ocular MG), classes II, III and IV generalized MG with mild, moderate and severe disease, respectively; Class V MG crisis. Separate subclasses under classes II, III and IV are designed: a if the predominant weakness is affecting limb/axial weakness or both; subclass b if the predominant weakness is affecting oropharyngeal or respiratory muscles or both. In the MGFA classification, lower roman numerals mean less severity. Changes in MGFA classification (regardless of subclass) are categorized as Improved (example, III to II), Same (example, II to II), or Worsened (example, II to III).

Time frame: Weeks 8, 24 and End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline)

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Improved)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Same)3 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Worsened)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Same)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Worsened)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Worsened)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Worsened)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Worsened)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Improved)4 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Improved)5 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Same)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Improved)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Same)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Same)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Same)6 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Worsened)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Same)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Improved)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Same)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Worsened)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 24 (Worsened)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeWeek 8 (Improved)6 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification Score Over TimeEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Improved)4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score

Number of participants with improvement of illness based on CGI-I scale score over time were reported. The CGI-I scale is the clinician/physician's global assessment of the change in severity of the patient's generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) since starting this study. The rating is given on a 7-point scale with lower scores indicating greater improvement (1= Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 3 = Minimally improved; 4 = No change; 5 =Minimally worse; 6 = Much worse; 7 = Very much worse. Values of 0 (not assessed) were excluded from analysis. Higher score indicates more severity.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, End of Treatment (EoT) (up to 253 days post-baseline), Follow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline)

Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) specifies the number of participants evaluated for specific timepoints. As per planned analysis, data is reported for individual arms and for all (total) participants both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (No change)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Much improved)2 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Much improved)3 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Very much improved)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Much improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Very Much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Minimally worse)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Very much improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Much worse)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Much improved)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (No change)2 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Very much improved)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Minimally improved)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Very Much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Minimally improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Much worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (No change)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Very Much improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Very much improved)1 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Much improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (No change)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (No change)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Minimally improved)0 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Minimally improved)2 Participants
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Minimally improved)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (No change)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Minimally worse)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (No change)7 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Minimally improved)12 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Much improved)5 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Very much improved)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Minimally worse)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (No change)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Minimally improved)6 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Much improved)8 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Very much improved)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Minimally worse)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (No change)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Minimally improved)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Much improved)10 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Very Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (No change)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Minimally improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Much improved)4 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Very Much improved)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Very Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Minimally improved)7 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Much improved)7 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Very Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Much worse)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Minimally worse)3 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (No change)5 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Minimally improved)8 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Much improved)2 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Minimally improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Minimally worse)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Minimally improved)14 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Much improved)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Very much improved)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Very Much improved)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Minimally worse)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Very Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (No change)8 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Much improved)5 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline) (No change)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (No change)5 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Minimally improved)7 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Minimally worse)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Much improved)7 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (No change)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Minimally improved)4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Minimally worse)2 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreEoT (up to 253 days post-baseline)(Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Much improved)11 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 12 (Very much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Minimally improved)8 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Very Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Very much improved)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Very Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Much improved)10 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Much improved)5 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (Minimally worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (Minimally improved)8 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 4 (Much worse)0 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 24 (No change)1 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreWeek 8 (No change)3 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Improvement of Illness Over Time Based on Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale ScoreFollow-up (up to 257 days post-baseline) (Much worse)3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Nipocalimab

Number of participants with NAbs were reported. Neutralizing antibodies to nipocalimab were assessed using a non-cell based competitive ligand binding ECLIA assay.

Time frame: Up to 257 days post-baseline

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug nipocalimab. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were positive for antibodies to nipocalimab. Per planned analysis, both individual arms and an arm for all (total) participants is presented.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Nipocalimab0 Participants
Nipocalimab-NipocalimabNumber of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Nipocalimab4 Participants
Nipocalimab (All Participants)Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Nipocalimab4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026