Skip to content

Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Local Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain

Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Local Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03895307
Enrollment
84
Registered
2019-03-29
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2021-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

chronic low back pain, kinesio taping, injection, local anesthetic

Brief summary

Low back pain can be seen in every period of life. More than 80 percent of the society complain of low back pain at any time of life. Although the frequency of applying to a health institution due to low back pain varies from one society to the other, it takes place in the first three places in each community. Low back pain should be differentiated as new (acute) and long-term (chronic). In the treatment of chronic low back pain, rest, education, pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, painful point injections, surgical interventions, kinesio taping can be applied. The most frequently used physical therapy modalities for treatment of chronic low back pain are superficial and deep heat modalities (hot pack, infrared, ultrasound, microwave diathermy radar) and analgesic effective electrotherapy (TENS, interferential flows) modalities. One of the most important treatments is exercise therapy. In cases where conventional treatment of chronic low back pain is insufficient, that is, the patient's pain is still ongoing and functional recovery is insufficient, some alternative methods are also applied. These treatments include ozone, prolotherapy injection applications, dry needling, acupuncture, phytotherapy, balneotherapy, kinesio taping and so on. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of painful point injection and kinesio taping treatments in lumbar region in patients with chronic low back pain.

Detailed description

Approximately 84 volunteer patients will be included in the study, patients older than 18 years, under 75 years of age, with a minimum of 3 months of mechanical back pain, Visual Analog Scale score of at least 60 patients will be included. Who are older than 18 years of age, having mental problems, having peripheral problems affecting the central nervous system, having received physical therapy to the lumbar region in the last 3 months, having been applied to the lumbar region within the last 3 months, having a history of lumbar region surgery, having a history of patients with motor deficit in the extremity, needle phobia, lidocaine and / or kinesio tape allergy, patients with wound, infection, burn, allergic lesions in the application area will not be included. Patients included in the study will be included in the first (first), second (second), third (third) or fourth (fourth) treatment group by random number generator method. The first group will be given the hot package (20 minutes / day) + exercise + 1. 4. 7. 10. 13. 16. days. The second group will be given a hot package (20 minutes / day) + exercise + 1. 4. 7. 10. 13. 16 days. The third group hot package (20 minutes / day) + exercise + 1. 4. 7. 10. 13. 16. days, kinesio tape will be applied to the determined areas. the fourth group hot package (20 minutes / day) + exercise + 1. 4. 7. 10. 13. 16. days sham tape application will be made in the regions determined. \*\*\*\* * Patients in all groups will continue to use the hotpack and exercises until the 3rd month after the first day of their study. First session exercises with the same physiotherapist (stretching for back-waist, iliopsoas and hamstring muscles; exercise range of hip and waist; hip and waist isometric exercises). Each patient will do the exercises 20 minutes after the hot package application. * saline and local anesthetic injection points to be applied to the lumbar region: 1. Future points on spinous projections from L1 to L5 2. Lumbar region 2 from the middle point of the spinous output bilateral and 2 cm to 4 cm lateral points 3. To each point of the iliac lobe of iliac crest will be injected subcutaneously with 0.5 ml 0.5% lidocaine-containing local anesthetic. 4. 6 mm 30 gauge needle tip will be used for injection. 5. For each patient who underwent subcutaneous local anesthetic, an average of 18-20 ml of 0.5% lidocaine-containing local anesthetic and 18-20 ml of 0.09% NaCl-containing isotonic saline will be used for each patient. 6. These points are the points of quadle technique applied in neural therapy. * Kinesio taping will use 2 cut-to-length I-bands with a length of about 15 cm long for one patient. Space correction technique will be used for patients. The lumbar region of the patients will be glued vertically to the paravertebral muscles vertically 3-4 cm lateral to the spinous projections. As a starting point for patients, S1 will be adhered to the vertebra without tension, then the patient will be asked to come with maximum lumbar flexion posterior. * For a patient in the treatment of sham kinesio taping, 2 pieces of approximately 15 cm long ends will be used to cut the curved I bands. The lumbar region of the patients will be glued vertically to the paravertebral muscles vertically 3-4 cm lateral to the spinous projections. Patients in the upright posture, kinesio tape S1 applied from the vertebra without stretching will be glued upwards and taped upwards.

Interventions

OTHERkinesio tape

two 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally

OTHERlocal anesthetic

local anesthetic: 18-20 cc %0.5 lidocaine subcutaneous injection

OTHERlocal serum physiologic

serum physiologic : 18-20 cc % 0.09 NaCl subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Under 18 years of age under 75 years 2. Chronic mechanic (decreased with resting and resting) for at least 3 months 3. Visual Analogue Scale score of at least 60-

Exclusion criteria

1. Having mental problems 2. Having the disease affecting the peripheral and central nervous system 3. Have received physical therapy in the lumbar region within the last 3 months 4. Injection into the lumbar region within the last 3 months 5. Having a history of waist region surgery 6. Low motor dysfunction in lower extremity in physical examination 7. Needle phobia 8. Is allergic to lidocaine 9. Kinesio tape allergy 10. Wound, infection, burn, allergic lesions in the application area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scaleday 0 (before intervention)visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Indexday 0 (before intervention)Oswestry Disabiliy Index: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 50. Higher scores reflect more severe disability
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Indexday 16 (after 6th application)Oswestry Disabiliy Index: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 50. Higher scores reflect more severe disability
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioningday 0 (before intervention)short form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. short form 36 physical functioning subscale scores are given. minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life
Spinal Mobility: Schober Testday 0 (before intervention)Schober's test is classically used to determine if there is a decrease in lumbar spine range of motion (flexion). Patient is standing, examiner marks the L5 spinous process by drawing a horizontal line across the patients back. A second line is marked 10 cm above the first line. Patient is then instructed to flex forward as if attempting to touch his/her toes, examiner remeasures distance between two lines with patient fully flexed. The difference between the measurements in erect and flexion positions indicates the outcome of the lumbar flexion. Less than 5cm increase in length with forward flexion: Decreased lumbar spine range of motion.
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Healthday 0 before interventionShort Form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Short Form-36 Mental health subscale scores are given. Mental minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Kinesio Taping
two 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally kinesio tape: two 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally
21
Sham Kinesio Taping
two 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally but without stretching kinesio tape: two 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally
20
Local Anesthetic
18-20 cc %0.5 lidocaine subcutaneous injection local anesthetic: local anesthetic: 18-20 cc %0.5 lidocaine subcutaneous injection
22
Local Serum Physiologic
18-20 cc % 0.09 NaCl subcutaneous injection local serum physiologic: serum physiologic : 18-20 cc % 0.09 NaCl subcutaneous injection
21
Total84

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLocal Serum PhysiologicLocal AnestheticSham Kinesio TapingKinesio TapingTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants17 Participants17 Participants20 Participants74 Participants
Age, Continuous41.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.69
47.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.95
47.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
39.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.72
44.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.09
Body Mass Index27.05 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.73
27.05 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47
27.25 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88
27.63 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
27.24 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.13
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants22 Participants20 Participants21 Participants84 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
21 participants22 participants20 participants21 participants84 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants5 Participants8 Participants9 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants17 Participants12 Participants12 Participants50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale

visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain

Time frame: 3 months after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale4.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Sham Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale5.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Local AnestheticPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Local Serum PhysiologicPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale6.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Primary

Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale

visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain

Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale7.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Sham Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale7.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Local AnestheticPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Local Serum PhysiologicPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale7.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Primary

Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale

visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain

Time frame: day 16 (after 6th application)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale2.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Sham Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale3.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Local AnestheticPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale2.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Local Serum PhysiologicPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale3.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Primary

Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale

visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain

Time frame: 1 month after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale3.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Sham Kinesio TapingPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale4.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Local AnestheticPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale3.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Local Serum PhysiologicPain Severity: Visual Analog Scale5.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Secondary

Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index

Oswestry Disabiliy Index: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 50. Higher scores reflect more severe disability

Time frame: day 16 (after 6th application)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index7.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.67
Sham Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index6.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.66
Local AnestheticDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index6.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
Local Serum PhysiologicDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index10.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.07
Secondary

Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index

Oswestry Disabiliy Index: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 50. Higher scores reflect more severe disability

Time frame: 1 month after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index10.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Sham Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index10.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
Local AnestheticDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index8.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.67
Local Serum PhysiologicDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index14.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.57
Secondary

Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index

Oswestry Disabiliy Index: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 50. Higher scores reflect more severe disability

Time frame: 3 months after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index13.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
Sham Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index14.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.52
Local AnestheticDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index13.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.35
Local Serum PhysiologicDisability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index16.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.89
Secondary

Disability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index

Oswestry Disabiliy Index: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 50. Higher scores reflect more severe disability

Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index17.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Sham Kinesio TapingDisability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index18.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.45
Local AnestheticDisability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index17.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Local Serum PhysiologicDisability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index17.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health

Short Form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Short Form-36 Mental health subscale scores are given. Mental minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life.

Time frame: 3 months after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health74.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.96
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health72.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health73.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health71.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.83
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health

Short Form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Short Form-36 Mental health subscale scores are given. Mental minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life.

Time frame: day 0 before intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health67.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health

Short Form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Short Form-36 Mental health subscale scores are given. Mental minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life.

Time frame: day 16 (after 6th application)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health79.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health78.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health77.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health

Short Form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Short Form-36 Mental health subscale scores are given. Mental minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life.

Time frame: 1 month after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health77.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.29
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health73.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.96
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health76.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.05
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health71.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.97
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning

short form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. short form 36 physical functioning subscale scores are given. minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life

Time frame: 3 months after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning58.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.26
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning55.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.35
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning56.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.27
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning54.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.63
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning

short form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. short form 36 physical functioning subscale scores are given. minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life

Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning53.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.08
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning50.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.53
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning45.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.54
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning50.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.97
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning

short form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. short form 36 physical functioning subscale scores are given. minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life

Time frame: day 16 (after 6th application)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning77.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.75
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.53
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.39
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning74.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.46
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning

short form 36: The SF-36 form generates eight subscales. The eight subscales are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. short form 36 physical functioning subscale scores are given. minimum score: 0 maximum score: 100. Higher scores indicate a better of quality of life

Time frame: 1 month after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning68.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.69
Sham Kinesio TapingPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning61.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.47
Local AnestheticPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning67.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.26
Local Serum PhysiologicPatient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning57.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.32
Secondary

Spinal Mobility: Schober Test

Schober's test is classically used to determine if there is a decrease in lumbar spine range of motion (flexion). Patient is standing, examiner marks the L5 spinous process by drawing a horizontal line across the patients back. A second line is marked 10 cm above the first line. Patient is then instructed to flex forward as if attempting to touch his/her toes, examiner remeasures distance between two lines with patient fully flexed. The difference between the measurements in erect and flexion positions indicates the outcome of the lumbar flexion. Less than 5cm increase in length with forward flexion: Decreased lumbar spine range of motion.

Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.09 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.58
Sham Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.37 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.77
Local AnestheticSpinal Mobility: Schober Test3.75 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.88
Local Serum PhysiologicSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.38 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

Spinal Mobility: Schober Test

Schober's test is classically used to determine if there is a decrease in lumbar spine range of motion (flexion). Patient is standing, examiner marks the L5 spinous process by drawing a horizontal line across the patients back. A second line is marked 10 cm above the first line. Patient is then instructed to flex forward as if attempting to touch his/her toes, examiner remeasures distance between two lines with patient fully flexed. The difference between the measurements in erect and flexion positions indicates the outcome of the lumbar flexion. Less than 5cm increase in length with forward flexion: Decreased lumbar spine range of motion.

Time frame: day 16 (after 6th application)

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.36 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.43
Sham Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.37 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.77
Local AnestheticSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.27 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.63
Local Serum PhysiologicSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.59 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Spinal Mobility: Schober Test

Schober's test is classically used to determine if there is a decrease in lumbar spine range of motion (flexion). Patient is standing, examiner marks the L5 spinous process by drawing a horizontal line across the patients back. A second line is marked 10 cm above the first line. Patient is then instructed to flex forward as if attempting to touch his/her toes, examiner remeasures distance between two lines with patient fully flexed. The difference between the measurements in erect and flexion positions indicates the outcome of the lumbar flexion. Less than 5cm increase in length with forward flexion: Decreased lumbar spine range of motion.

Time frame: 1 month after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.36 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.43
Sham Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.42 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.74
Local AnestheticSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.27 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.63
Local Serum PhysiologicSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.54 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.54
Secondary

Spinal Mobility: Schober Test

Schober's test is classically used to determine if there is a decrease in lumbar spine range of motion (flexion). Patient is standing, examiner marks the L5 spinous process by drawing a horizontal line across the patients back. A second line is marked 10 cm above the first line. Patient is then instructed to flex forward as if attempting to touch his/her toes, examiner remeasures distance between two lines with patient fully flexed. The difference between the measurements in erect and flexion positions indicates the outcome of the lumbar flexion. Less than 5cm increase in length with forward flexion: Decreased lumbar spine range of motion.

Time frame: 3 months after intervention

Population: intent to treat population(all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.36 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.43
Sham Kinesio TapingSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.42 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.74
Local AnestheticSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.2 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.61
Local Serum PhysiologicSpinal Mobility: Schober Test4.54 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.54

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026