Skip to content

Effect of Strategies for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Colombia

Effect of Strategic Purchasing of Antiviral Drugs and the Clinical Pathway for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Colombia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03895294
Acronym
HEPCSTRATEGY
Enrollment
124
Registered
2019-03-29
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2019-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C

Keywords

Direct-Acting Antivirals, Health Services Accessibility

Brief summary

Hepatitis C is a public health problem and the high cost of the Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAA) is one of the main limitations for treatment worldwide. In Colombia, the Ministry of Health and Social Protection (MoHSP) has made progress in addressing Hepatitis C problem in order to control the infection and resolve barriers to access to medicines. One of the strategies implemented was the purchase of DAA, in association with the PAHO, and the instauration of the Clinical Pathway for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The implementation of the Clinical Pathway has required the integration of health care processes and the respective report in the health information systems, allowing a high level of control in the monitoring of the Hepatitis C and the subsequent generation of indicators. However, there is limited information on the effects of the strategic purchase and the instauration of the Clinical Pathway on the costs of care, clinical outcomes and the quality of health care for patients with Hepatitis C in Colombia. The aim of this study is to establish the effect of strategic purchasing and the Clinical Pathway for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C, in the clinical results, in the general costs and quality of health care of Hepatitis C patients in Colombia.

Detailed description

A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group will be performed, where there will be an intervention group and a control group formed naturally before the investigation. In order to reduce the possible selection bias due to the lack of randomization, the propensity score method will be used. 62 patients will be included in each arm. An estimation and comparison of the direct costs of the care of patients with Hepatitis C, before and after the implementation of the strategic purchase and the Clinical Pathway will be made, using a top to bottom method. A questionnaire will be applied to the patients of the intervention group in order to identify barriers and facilitators to Hepatitis C health care and patient satisfaction with health care process under the Clinical Pathway.

Interventions

OTHERHealth care under the strategic purchase-Clinical pathway

1\) purchase of DAA by the MoHSP; 2) diagnosis of the patient (confirmed by quantitative HCV RNA test); 2) prescription of the treatment by a specialist in internal medicine, hepatology or Infectious disease; 3) daily supervised drug administration by a nurse or weekly treatment dispensing by pharmacist; 4) Pharmaceutical Care (includes: consultation with pharmacist at weeks 0, 4, week of the end of treatment (8, 12 or 24) and week of evaluation of effectiveness (week 12 or 24 after the end of treatment); health education and administrative support. In case of identifying any Drug-related Problem, the respective pharmaceutical intervention was made.

OTHERUsual care process prior strategic purchase-clinical pathway

1\) diagnosis of the patient (confirmed by quantitative HCV RNA test); 2) prescription of the treatment by a specialist in hepatology; 3) weekly treatment dispensing by pharmacist; 4) patient use; 5) Pharmaceutical Care (includes: consultation with pharmacist at weeks 0, 4, 8, week of the end of treatment (12 or 24) and week of evaluation of effectiveness (week 12 or 24 after the end of treatment); health education and administrative support). In case of identifying any Drug-related problem, the respective pharmaceutical intervention was made.

Sponsors

Universidad de Antioquia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with Chronic Hepatitis C confirmed by quantitative HCV RNA test * Patient affiliated to the contributory system of one Health Promoting Enterprise from Colombia. * Patients with prescription of pharmacological treatment for Hepatitis C.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with incomplete information in at least one of the following variables: fibrosis, cirrhosis (if applicable), antiviral drug.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Access to treatment2 monthsProportion of patients who initiates treatment, in comparison with the total number of patients with indication of treatment (confirmed diagnosis and prescription of treatment).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opportunity at the start of treatment2 monthsThe difference in days between the date of the first prescription of the antiviral treatment and the start date.
Effectiveness6 monthsProportion of treated patients that achieved Sustained Virological Response (SVR), that is, undetectable HCV viral load (lower than the Lower Quantification Limit -LL-), 12 weeks after the end of the DAA therapy (SVR12) or 24 weeks after the end of treatment for the schemes that include interferon (SVR24)
Drug-related problem6 monthsProportion of patients who initiated treatment and who presented at least one Drug-Related Problem registered in the clinical history, database and / or pharmacovigilance reports.

Countries

Colombia

Contacts

Primary ContactPedro Amariles, PhD
pedro.amariles@udea.edu.co+5742195476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026