Skip to content

The Learning Effects of Attentional Strategy on Dual-task Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Behavioral Performance and Neural Plasticity

The Learning Effects of Attentional Strategy on Dual-task Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Behavioral Performance and Neural Plasticity

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03895125
Enrollment
1
Registered
2019-03-29
Start date
2019-03-07
Completion date
2020-02-12
Last updated
2020-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

dual-task training, attention, Parkinson's disease, walking, EEG

Brief summary

\[year1\] 1. To compare the effects of dual-task training with two different task priority instruction in people with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls on dual-task weight shifting performances. 2. Investigate the changes of brain activities and functional connectivity after dual-task training with different task priority instructions. \[year 2-3\] To investigate the learning effects of walking with internal/external focus on walking automaticity and brain plasticity in dual-task walking training for PD patients with/without freezing of gait.

Detailed description

Postural-suprapostural task is defined as postural control takes place while another concurrent task is being performed, belonging to dual-task paradigms. Effective dual-task training is important to patients with Parkinson disease (PD), because they often lose balance and fall in dual-task conditions. Attentional strategy includes 1) task-priority between postural and suprapostural tasks and 2) internal and external focus for the postural task, which is the critical factor for both dual-task control and motor learning. However, the appropriateness of attentional strategy has not been investigated in dual-task training in patients with PD. Besides, there is lack of neural evidence of brain plasticity for previous studies about dual-task training in patients with PD. With the uses of EEG, EMG and behavioral measures, the purpose of this 3-year research project is to investigate the differences in performance quality and intrinsic neural mechanisms of dual-task training in PD, by adopting task-priority strategy and internal/external strategy during weight-shifting and walking. In the first year, the investigators will characterize task-priority effect (posture-priority vs. supraposture-priority) on dual-task training, with a special focus on modulation of brain plasticity and muscle activity patterns in weight-shifting posture for patients with PD. In the second and third years, the learning effects of walking internal/external focus on walking automaticity and brain plasticity will be investigated in dual-task walking training for PD patients with/without freezing of gait. Besides, the transfer effects of dual-task learning will be also investigated on medication off state. The present project is expected to have significant contributions not only to gain a better insight to neural correlates of dual-task training with different attentional strategies under weight-shifting and walking, but to optimize treatment strategy for PD patients with balance or dual-tasking disturbances.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL[year1] dual-task training with task priority strategy

postural focus: focus mainly on postural performances while dual-tasking suprapostural focus: focus mainly on suprapostural performances while dual-tasking

BEHAVIORAL[year2-3] dual-task training with internal and external focus

internal focus: focus mainly on body movements external focus: focus mainly on object in the environment

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\[year1\] Inclusion criteria: 1. For people with Parkinson's disease 1. modified Hoehn & Yahr stage 2-3 2. without dementia and able to follow instructions 2. For healthy controls age and gender matched healthy subjects as control group

Exclusion criteria

1. MMSE \< 26 2. with other disease that may influence balance ability 3. with marked action and postural tremor \[year2-3\] inclusion criteria: 1. idiopathic Parkinson's disease 2. modified Hoehn & Yahr stage 2-3 3. without marked action or postural tremor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
suprapostural performanceabout 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutesmeasuring the rotation angle of box on the hand (unit: degree)
Cadenceabout 10-20 seconds for each trialcollecting by using the GAITRite (unit: step/s)
Gait symmetryabout 10-20 seconds for each trialcollecting single leg supporting time of right and left leg by using the GAITRite
postural performanceabout 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutesmeasuring the amount of body weight shifting (unit: kg)
Walking speedabout 10-20 seconds for each trialcollecting by using the GAITRite electronic walkway (CIR systems, Inc. ,USA) 24 inches(61cm) wide and 192 inches (488cm, 16ft) long, total 18,432 sensor (unit: m/s)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
electromyography (EMG)about 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutesto collect the muscle activity (unit: mV)
electroencephalography (EEG)about 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutesto collect the brain activity (unit: uV)

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026