Skip to content

Observational Study Evaluating Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Humira in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Special Drug Use-Results Survey of Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Humira in Long Term Treatment in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03894956
Enrollment
46
Registered
2019-03-29
Start date
2019-05-02
Completion date
2021-11-10
Last updated
2022-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)

Keywords

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS), Humira, Adalimumab

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of Humira in patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who have been prescribed Humira by their treating physician as per routine clinical practice for the treatment of HS.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants previously treated with Humira. * Participants who do not provide consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of participants who reported any serious infections during the studyUp to Week 52Percentage of participants with incidence of serious infections are reported.
Percentage of participants who reported any adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during the studyUp to Week 52ADRs will be coded by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) dictionary.
Percentage of participants who reported any infections during the studyUp to Week 52Percentage of participants with incidence of infections are reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient's global assessment of skin painFrom Baseline to Week 52Patient's global assessment of skin pain is evaluated on a 11-point scale with 0 for no pain and 10 for worst skin pain imaginable.
Percentage of participants achieving Improved of overall improvement by physicianUp to Week 52Percentage of participants achieving overall improvement (improved, unchanged, impossible to evaluate) is assessed by physician.
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)From Baseline to Week 52DLQI is a 10-question validated dermatologic disease questionnaire to measure quality of life.
Percentage of participants achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR)Up to week 52HiSCR is defined as at least 50% reduction in the number of abscesses and inflammatory nodules and no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)From Baseline to Week 52CRP values are measured as an inflammatory parameter. Low CRP values mean less inflammation.

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026