Skip to content

Early or Late Booster in Basic Life Support for Health Care Professionals

Does an Early Booster Session Improve Performance and Retention of Basic Life Support Skills Compared to a Late Booster in Health Care Professionals? A Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03893253
Enrollment
84
Registered
2019-03-28
Start date
2018-10-22
Completion date
2020-07-17
Last updated
2022-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basic Life Support

Brief summary

Attrition of skills after basic life support (BLS) training is common. Psychology studies have established that for basic memory recall tasks, spaced learning strategies improve retention. Spaced learning is often organized as a refresher or 'booster' course after initial training. This study aims to investigate if this principle holds true for BLS skills, which require rapid memory recall and efficient deployment of procedural skills while under time pressure.

Detailed description

Health care professionals who have not received BLS training in the 6 months leading up to the date of participation will be recruited from local health care institutions in the greater-Ottawa area. Participants will be randomized into one of three groups: early booster, late booster, or no booster (control). Currently, no booster is the educational standard. The early booster group will receive a booster at 3 weeks, the late booster at 2 months, and no booster for the control. All participants will undergo BLS training, an immediate post-test, and a retention post-test at 4 months. Post-tests involve a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. Raters will be blinded to the group allocation and simulation test order.

Interventions

The early booster group will receive a booster teaching session at 3 weeks post-training followed by feedback.

The late booster group will receive a booster teaching session at 2 months post-training followed by feedback

Sponsors

Institut du Savoir Montfort
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hopital Montfort
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Trained evaluators will rate a series of videos but will be blinded to which arm of the study participants are from.

Intervention model description

Participants randomized to one of three groups : early booster, late booster, or no booster (control group)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

-Healthcare professionals who interact with patients and have not received any BLS training or practice in the 6 months leading up to the date of their participation will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

* under 18 years of age * non healthcare professionals * healthcare professionals who don't interact directly with patients * healthcare professionals who have completed Basic Life Support training in the previous six months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Basic Life Support Performance4 monthsBasic Life Support performance, as measured by the standardized Heart and Stroke checklist score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to start chest compressions4 monthsTime from entering the scene to initiation of compression
Time to defibrillation4 monthsTime from start to defibrillation with AED
Quality of CPR4 monthsHand placement on lower half of sternum, 30 compressions in no less than 15 and no more than 18 seconds, compresses at least 5 cm, complete recoil after each compression
Overall BLS performance4 monthsBasic Life Support performance, as measured by the standardized Heart and Stroke checklist (PASS OR FAIL)

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026