Skip to content

Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Enhanced, EHR-Facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03892967
Enrollment
50207
Registered
2019-03-27
Start date
2019-03-28
Completion date
2023-01-31
Last updated
2025-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Brief summary

This early phase I trial investigates enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer system control. Cancer and its treatment are often associated with severe, disabling symptoms that have been causally linked to diminished survival, increased healthcare utilization, degraded quality of life, unemployment, and non-adherence to recommended cancer treatments. Collaborative case management for control of moderate or worse sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE symptoms), and physical dysfunction among cancer survivors and patients with cancer may improve quality of life, symptom severity, and adherence to cancer treatment, and may also reduce need for acute care.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Conduct a cluster randomized pragmatic trial with a stepped wedge design to test the hypothesis that a symptom control-focused enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) intervention will significantly reduce sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE) symptom and physical dysfunction scores, reduce unplanned hospitalizations and emergency department visits, improve adherence to cancer therapies, and improve self-reported quality of life. II. Evaluate the hypothesis that use of a multifaceted, evidence-based implementation strategy to support adoption and use of the E2C2 system will result in improvements in implementation and clinical outcomes. III. Conduct a mixed methods evaluation to detect, understand and reduce disparities in the adoption and implementation of the E2C2 intervention among elderly and rural-dwelling patients with cancer. OUTLINE: The first Primary Objective involves a stepped wedge enrollment into the study intervention. Involvement is based off the patients' responses to the pain questionnaire (low pain = no involvement, moderate pain = offer of patient education materials, severe pain = involvement of a Symptom Care Manager). Symptom Care Managers will work with interested patients who endorse high pain to help address and manage their pain. The third objective involves a subset of patients included in the E2C2 who are offered to participate in a one-time interview lasting 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also will be invited to participate in an interview lasting 15-30 minutes.

Interventions

OTHERInterview

Participate in interview

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being seen for a solid or liquid cancer at a Midwest Mayo Clinic Midwest Mayo Clinic Health Systems (MCHS) site or for a solid tumor at Mayo Clinic Rochester

Exclusion criteria

* No Minors (under age 18) will receive the questionnaires but no further exclusions can be made based on the standard of care for questionnaire assignment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment from baseline score were modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.
Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresUp to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment following any NRS score of \>=4/10 modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Average Pain Interference Over the Past WeekBaseline to 46 monthsMeasured PROMIS-CAT T-score up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Change in Physical Function ScoreBaseline to 46 monthsMeasured PROMIS-CAT up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a better outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Change in Anxiety ScoreBaseline to 46 monthsMeasured PROMIS-CAT T-scores up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Adherence to Cancer TreatmentUp to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)Number of doses of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide administered.
Number of Deceased ParticipantsUp to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)Vital status (living or deceased) was determined by Accurint record search across multiple sources, including the Social Security Death Index
Health Care UtilizationUp to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, 18 months after last clinical encounter, or end of study)ER visits, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions
Change in Depression ScoreBaseline to 46 monthsMeasured PROMIS-CAT T-score up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From March 2019 to January 2023, 50,207 patients (in fifteen clusters) were enrolled and administered ePROMs in association with oncology visits.

Pre-assignment details

Participants could be enrolled for more than one Period over the course of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care (Control)
Participants were administered ePROM surveillance alone.
16,180
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)
Participants were administered ePROMs during EHR-facilitated collaborative care (ECC) periods. Automated responses, matched to symptom type and intensity, appeared following a patient's report of an actionable symptom, defined as \>=4/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). For any actionable symptom, respondents were asked if they wanted to receive symptom-specific self-management resources. For severe symptoms, \>=7/10, respondents were asked if they wanted to work remotely with a Symptom Care Manager (SCM) to develop an individualized symptom management plan.
19,084
Total35,264

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Step 1: 4/1/2019-9/30/2019Participants did not answer at least two surveys and were not included in the analytic cohort1,2831,7281,8231,443728
Step 2: 10/1/2019-5/31/2020Participants did not answer at least two surveys and were not included in the analytic cohort474726774552366
Step 3: 6/1/2020-1/31/2021Participants did not answer at least two surveys and were not included in the analytic cohort710993910739280
Step 4: 2/1/2021-9/30/2021Participants did not answer at least two surveys and were not included in the analytic cohort585893962830315
Step 5: 10/1/2021-5/31/2022Participants did not answer at least two surveys and were not included in the analytic cohort5088451,025751302
Step 6: 6/1/2022-1/31/2023Participants did not answer at least two surveys and were not included in the analytic cohort7971,1771,3981,069486

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care (Control)EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Total
Age, Customized
Age
<=35
566 Participants646 Participants1212 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
35-45
1200 Participants1514 Participants2714 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
45-55
2336 Participants2877 Participants5213 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
55-65
4188 Participants4993 Participants9181 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
65-75
4933 Participants5871 Participants10804 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
75-85
2466 Participants2689 Participants5155 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
>85
491 Participants494 Participants985 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15982 Participants18816 Participants34798 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
134 Participants189 Participants323 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
64 Participants79 Participants143 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
62 Participants86 Participants148 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
248 Participants357 Participants605 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
149 Participants180 Participants329 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
246 Participants266 Participants512 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15468 Participants18189 Participants33657 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16180 participants19084 participants35264 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9621 Participants11138 Participants20759 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6559 Participants7946 Participants14505 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2,214 / 16,1803,192 / 24,874
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 16,1800 / 24,874
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 16,1800 / 24,874

Outcome results

Primary

Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores

Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment following any NRS score of \>=4/10 modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.

Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)

Population: The analytic cohort includes trial participants who completed 2 or more NRS assessments and reported at least 1 NRS score \>= 4/10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Usual Care (Control)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresPhysical function impairment3.23 units on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresSleep2.91 units on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresAnxiety2.51 units on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresDepression2.27 units on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresFatigue3.96 units on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresPain2.53 units on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresFatigue3.87 units on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresPhysical function impairment3.30 units on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresDepression2.17 units on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresSleep2.85 units on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresPain2.55 units on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoresAnxiety2.37 units on a scale
Primary

Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.

Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment from baseline score were modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.

Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)

Population: The analytic cohort includes trial participants who completed 2 or more NRS assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Usual Care (Control)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Anxiety2.09 score on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Depression1.90 score on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Fatigue3.27 score on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Pain2.18 score on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Impaired Physical Function2.75 score on a scale
Usual Care (Control)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Sleep2.46 score on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Impaired Physical Function2.78 score on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Anxiety1.98 score on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Pain2.14 score on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Depression1.81 score on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Sleep2.39 score on a scale
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.Fatigue3.21 score on a scale
Secondary

Adherence to Cancer Treatment

Number of doses of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide administered.

Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)

Population: The analyses were restricted to the subgroup of patients with breast cancer being treated with docetaxel/cyclophosphamide in order to ensure comparable receipt of chemotherapeutic regimens between the comparator groups. Because docetaxel and cyclophosphamide may be first-/second-line therapy for breast cancer, a large participant subgroup that offered adequate power was chosen. Patients who crossed over from usual care to EHR-facilitated collaborative care were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care (Control)Adherence to Cancer TreatmentNumber of doses of docetaxel administered3.530303 number of doses administeredStandard Deviation 1.088281
Usual Care (Control)Adherence to Cancer TreatmentNumber of doses of cyclophosphamide administered3.707071 number of doses administeredStandard Deviation 0.973151
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Adherence to Cancer TreatmentNumber of doses of docetaxel administered3.765625 number of doses administeredStandard Deviation 0.6458148
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Adherence to Cancer TreatmentNumber of doses of cyclophosphamide administered3.78125 number of doses administeredStandard Deviation 0.7310601
Secondary

Change in Anxiety Score

Measured PROMIS-CAT T-scores up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.

Time frame: Baseline to 46 months

Population: Patients who answered \>=1 Anxiety PROMIS-CAT were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care (Control)Change in Anxiety Score51.86451 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.036415
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Change in Anxiety Score51.35445 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.303022
Secondary

Change in Average Pain Interference Over the Past Week

Measured PROMIS-CAT T-score up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.

Time frame: Baseline to 46 months

Population: Patients who answered \>=1 Pain Interference PROMIS-CAT were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care (Control)Change in Average Pain Interference Over the Past Week52.57027 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.80923
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Change in Average Pain Interference Over the Past Week53.2717 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.918807
Secondary

Change in Depression Score

Measured PROMIS-CAT T-score up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.

Time frame: Baseline to 46 months

Population: Patients who answered \>=1 Depression PROMIS-CAT were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care (Control)Change in Depression Score49.05267 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.642265
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Change in Depression Score48.49032 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.666607
Secondary

Change in Physical Function Score

Measured PROMIS-CAT up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a better outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.

Time frame: Baseline to 46 months

Population: Patients who answered \>=1 Physical Function PROMIS-CAT were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care (Control)Change in Physical Function Score43.83007 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.641792
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Change in Physical Function Score43.18325 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.561469
Secondary

Health Care Utilization

ER visits, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions

Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, 18 months after last clinical encounter, or end of study)

Population: Utilization data were available for the entire E2C2 trial cohort irrespective of ePROM completion. To assess robustness, we conducted analyses that included the full cohort, the \>=1 ePROM completers, and the \>=2 ePROM completers. In addition, we created subgroups based on residential proximity to a trial site to assess the extent of care provided at non-participating institutions. Here we report the patients who completed 1 or more surveys and resided within 120 miles from a trial site.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Usual Care (Control)Health Care UtilizationHospitalizations3415 events
Usual Care (Control)Health Care UtilizationED visits4331 events
Usual Care (Control)Health Care UtilizationICU admissions940 events
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Health Care UtilizationHospitalizations3009 events
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Health Care UtilizationICU admissions722 events
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Health Care UtilizationED visits3495 events
Secondary

Number of Deceased Participants

Vital status (living or deceased) was determined by Accurint record search across multiple sources, including the Social Security Death Index

Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual Care (Control)Number of Deceased Participants2214 Participants
EHR-facilitated Collaborative Care (Intervention)Number of Deceased Participants3192 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026