Skip to content

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Back Pain

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Back Pain: Evaluation of Short Term Changes in Functional Status, Quality of Life, and Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03892759
Enrollment
31
Registered
2019-03-27
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2022-03-04
Last updated
2022-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Fascial Distortion, Lumbar Pain, Somatic Dysfunction, Thoracic Pain

Keywords

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

Brief summary

This study will investigate if Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) is beneficial for patients presenting with back pain.

Detailed description

Low back pain is the most common cause of disability in people under age 45 and accounts for 20% of all physician visits. Osteopathic manual treatment (OMT) has been used to manage patients with acute and chronic back pain. These treatments are often reported as beneficial by patients. This study will examine the effect on functional status, range of motion, quality of life, and pain with Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT). Baseline will be defined as someone who has never had OMT, chiropractic, or massage, or has not received such treatments in the last 90 days. Back pain will be specific to pain presenting in the lumbar or thoracic regions of the spine.

Interventions

A set of hands-on techniques used by Osteopathic Physicians for the assessment and treatment of somatic dysfunction.

Sponsors

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pre/post prospective one group pilot study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult 18 years of age or older * Back pain * Able to arrange transportation and arrive to three study appointments.

Exclusion criteria

* May not have had manual treatment (massage, chiropractic, or OMT) in the last 90 days * May not have any labs or imaging for their back pain recommended by their physicians the subject has not yet completed * May not have had back surgery in past 60 days * May not be pregnant or have given birth in the last 30 days * May not have be unable to tell a member of the study team their name, city they live in and the current year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Back Pain at 8 weeks8 weeksPain as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale indicates a level of pain from 0 to 10 with higher number associated with a worse outcome or greater level of pain.
Change from Baseline Back Range of Motion at 8 weeks8 weeksRange of Motion a measured by Back Range of Motion (BROM) Instrument
Change from Baseline Back Pain at 3 weeks3 weeksPain as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale indicates a level of pain from 0 to 10 with higher number associated with a worse outcome or greater level of pain.
Change from Baseline Functional Status at 8 weeks8 weeksFunctional Status as measured by Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Question responses are totaled for a score of 0 to 24 with higher number indicating a worse outcome or greater level of disability.
Change from Baseline Functional Status at 12 weeks12 weeksFunctional Status as measured by Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Question responses are totaled for a score of 0 to 24 with higher number indicating a worse outcome or greater level of disability.
Change from Baseline Back Range of Motion at 3 weeks3 WeeksRange of Motion a measured by Back Range of Motion (BROM) Instrument

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Assessment of Quality of Life at 12 weeks12 weeksQuality of Life as measured by PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire. Total Physical Health Score of 7 to 17 with lower numbers indicating better physical health outcome and Total Mental Health Score of 8 to 16 with lower numbers indicating better mental health outcome.
Change from Baseline Assessment of Quality of Life at 8 weeks8 weeksQuality of Life as measured by PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire. Total Physical Health Score of 7 to 17 with lower numbers indicating better physical health outcome and Total Mental Health Score of 8 to 16 with lower numbers indicating better mental health outcome.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026