Colon Polyp
Conditions
Brief summary
The study shall mainly help to better evaluate the performance the APDS device and secondly it may help to assess the potential of the future alpha version of the device to be a useful and effective for the detection of colon Polyps.
Detailed description
Primary objectives • To evaluate, in objective way, the usability of the future alpha version of the APDS device by testing the sensitivity and specificity of its results achieved from running it on the collected recorded videos of Colonoscopy screening tests of the general population. Secondary objectives • When the APDS would be ready for field installation (Beta Version), to install it in the Gastroenterology institute of the medical center, in order to evaluate, as part of a continuation study, the physicians satisfaction from the APDS performance.
Interventions
To evaluate, in objective way, the usability of the future alpha version of the APDS device by testing the sensitivity and specificity of its results achieved from running it on the collected recorded videos of Colonoscopy screening tests of the general population.
Sponsors
Magentiq Eye LTD
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Subjects must meet all the - criteria related to regular colonoscopy according to the standard of care at the Gastroenterology Department of the selected center, \_In addition the following - criteria have to be met to be eligible for the study: 1. Able to read, understand and provide written Informed Consent; 2. Females or males - older than 18 years old
Exclusion criteria
Any of the following colonoscopy related
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recorded colonoscopy video which was verified by visual inspection to have sufficient high quality. | Half an hour from the end of the procedure at which the video was recorded. | Each recorded video is visually inspected immediately at the end of the procedure by an experienced team member who rates it with a number between 1 (the lowest quality) to 10 (the highest quality). This is a quality scale which indicates the general quality of the recorded video. Only videos with rate above 7 are considered as having sufficient high quality that enables to use them and analyze them. |
| De-Identified procedure report which was visually inspected to verify that it includes all the needed details about the polyps that were detected during the procedure. | Half an hour from the end of the procedure for which the procedure report was filled-in. | Each de-Identified procedure report is visually inspected immediately at the end of the procedure by an experienced team member who gives it binary score (0 or 1), 1 if it includes all the needed details about the polyps that were detected during the procedure, and 0 if does not include all the needed details about the polyps that were detected during the procedure. Only procedure reports which get the value of 1 can be used for full analysis of the recorded procedure. |
Countries
Israel
Contacts
Primary ContactDror Zur, Ph.D.
Outcome results
None listed