Skip to content

Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures

Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03891004
Enrollment
47
Registered
2019-03-26
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound, Tissue Adhesion

Brief summary

To compare skin closure via subcuticular suture versus tissue adhesive (Dermabond) in urogynecological robotic surgeries. The primary outcome is incision cosmesis at the 12 week follow up visit. Secondary outcome is the operative time between the two methods of closure.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is compare skin closure via suture versus tissue adhesive (Dermabond) in urogynecological robotic surgeries. The primary outcome is incision cosmesis. Therefore, if the tissue adhesive is cosmetically comparable to that of sutures, that will be reason to use tissue adhesives over traditional sutures. In these surgeries, there are five to six port sites (compared to fewer for usual laparoscopic procedures) and the procedures are lengthy procedures (average duration about 300 minutes as per recent AUGS/ACOG committee opinion), so if the investigators can show significant time reduction for closure, that should reduce operative time and costs. To the investigators' knowledge, this will be the first study of its kind to make this comparison for urogynecologic robotic procedures.

Interventions

PROCEDURESubcuticular Skin Closure

We will only close the subcuticular layer with suture

No subcuticular closure will be done. Only tissue adhesives applied to the approximated skin

Sponsors

St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The evaluators of cosmesis will be blind to the group assignment. The person who will evaluate the scars will be a nurse or medical assistant.

Intervention model description

This will be a randomized controlled trial comparing skin closure after robotic urogynecologic surgery with tissue adhesive versus subcuticular suture.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women, ages 18 years and older, undergoing any urogynecologic robotic procedure at St. John Hospital and Medical Center from March 19, 2018 - November 30, 2018.

Exclusion criteria

* We will exclude women with active skin infections as they may contribute to poor wound healing and infections. We will also exclude procedures that are converted to laparotomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incision Cosmesis12 weeksOur primary outcome measure is to compare incision cosmesis between the two closure methods at the 12 week postoperative visit. The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation scale is used. A point is awarded in each of the following categories: width, height, color, hatch/suture marks, overall appearance. Poorer cosmesis is indicated by a lower score. Highest score possible is 5 points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incision closure time30 minutesThe time of each closure method will be recorded and compared.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026