Skip to content

Effects of the Application of a Reflex Locomotion Program in the Neurological Hand

Effects of the Application of a Reflex Locomotion Program on Sitting in the Neurological Hand of the Chronic Adult Patient

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03890965
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-03-26
Start date
2019-05-29
Completion date
2019-09-25
Last updated
2020-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurological Disorder

Keywords

stroke, Physical therapy, neurological hand, Vojta therapy

Brief summary

The recovery of the function of the hand is one of the most important aspects for patients who have suffered the consequences of neurological damage. Currently there are numerous therapeutic procedures aimed at rehabilitation that have scientific evidence such as restrictive therapy. However, dysfunction of the upper limb has an impact on the whole body that is not always taken into consideration.

Detailed description

The intervention of the stimulation of the reflex locomotion is carried out in this study in a sitting position in a conventional chair, an unorthodox posture in the usual treatment of Vojta therapy. Description of the sitting posture: the back in axial extension with the shoulders located in front of the hips. The elbows must be supported with the medial epicondyl in contact on a table, whose height is at the level of the end of the patient's sternum. The forearms are placed prone with the palms facing the surface. In this position we place a rubber sphere 3 centimeters in diameter under the pisiform of one of the patient's wrists. The reflex stimulation is performed by the passive pressure exerted by the weight of the wrist (pisiform) on the rubber sphere. Simultaneously the patient has to exert a slight pressure with the heel towards the ground with his foot. This foot will be the opposite of the wrist that has the sphere under the pisiform. It is a cross-stimulation, that is, pisiform in one hand together with the load in the heel of the opposite side. Alternating each diagonal 4 times, 5 minutes each. Total session 20 minutes, 2 times per day, every day according to degree of affectation The duration of the study will depend on the degree of involvement: mild 2 weeks, moderate 3 months.

Interventions

OTHERReflex locomoction therapy

The intervention of the stimulation of the reflex locomotion is carried out in this study in a sitting position in a conventional chair, an unorthodox posture in the usual treatment of Vojta therapy. The reflex stimulation is performed by the passive pressure exerted by the weight of the wrist (pisiform) on the rubber sphere. Simultaneously the patient has to exert a slight pressure with the heel towards the ground with his foot. This foot will be the opposite of the wrist that has the sphere under the pisiform. Alternating each diagonal 4 times, 5 minutes each. Total session 20 minutes, 2 times x day, every day according to degree of affectation.

Sponsors

NUMEN Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pretest-posttest trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sequelae in the upper limb after neurological damage. * Understanding and oral expression preserved. * More than a year after the episode. * Possibility of walking

Exclusion criteria

* Aphasia. * Concomitant diseases: Diabetes and arthritis of the hand.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
kinesiological test of the upper limb2 weeks for mild grade and 3 months for moderate degreeShoulder: flexion and maximum abduction. Forearm: Supination / pronation. Wrist: maximum dorsal flexion. Hand: finger extension
The Box and Block Test2 weeks for mild grade and 3 months for moderate degree.The Box and Block Test is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026